Register now to get rid of these ads!

Lightning Motor

Discussion in 'The Hokey Ass Message Board' started by kingjj, Jan 13, 2007.

  1. kingjj
    Joined: Jan 5, 2007
    Posts: 9

    kingjj
    Member

    Has anyone put a Modular motor in a shoebox?
     
  2. Mizlplix
    Joined: Jan 8, 2007
    Posts: 170

    Mizlplix
    Member
    from S/W USA

    My friend put a Mod cop car motor in a '56 'Bird. Does that count?

    Heh, I own a 1999 Lightning. the motor would be Boss in a rod. Just get the harness and sensors with the engine in the deal.

    It is basically a 5.4L, so an auto or manual trans can be used. No special problems I can thiunk of as long as ur up on late Ford systems.

    I have a 1989 Taurus SHO motor in a '32.

    As you might guess, I'm a FORD guy. I worked with Ford Engineering for 6 years and have collected a few itms of knowledge. PST me if you get stuck. MIZ
     
  3. AnimalAin
    Joined: Jul 20, 2002
    Posts: 3,416

    AnimalAin
    Member

    Buddy of mine did an installation for another guy, although not a shoebox (late-40s Merc). The electronics were not quite trivial, but I think more support is available now than when he did it (3 or 4 years ago). He ended up troubleshooting it with help from the local dealer.

    The 5.4 Lightning motor is pretty wide, and the transmission in those trucks is huge, but the motor would make a shoebox scoot. Hell, if a hemi will fit.....
     
  4. chopper103in
    Joined: Oct 10, 2006
    Posts: 94

    chopper103in
    Member

    there is i guy near me who put a 4.6 dohc motor in a 55-56 ford wagon
     
  5. kingjj
    Joined: Jan 5, 2007
    Posts: 9

    kingjj
    Member

    I got the whole truck that a guy totaled out it only had 18,000 miles. A gentlemen at Jamco told me to post this question here ti get info.
     
  6. Muttley
    Joined: Nov 30, 2003
    Posts: 18,501

    Muttley
    Member

    Do you like to torture yourself? You can make just as much power (or way more) for the same amount of money with a motor that wont be a pain in the backside to install. As an added bonus that Lightning motor will have tons of electronic crap attached to it and it wont be anywhere close to being traditional........but hey you are running a hood right? :rolleyes: :rolleyes:
     
  7. Misfit
    Joined: Sep 8, 2006
    Posts: 100

    Misfit
    Member
    from Upstate NY

    What year Lightining? It sounds like it will have a PATs antitheft system, you know with the chip in the key? That might cause some problems, but I'm sure it can worked around if you want to reuse the stock computer. If your good with electronics, you could build a Megasquirt to run it. That's what I did and it's much simpler than trying to reuse the existing electronics. Makes for a much cleaner installation too. If you use the auto transmission, it will need a computer to run it too. If you don't use the stock computer for the engine/trans, you'll need an aftermarket computer for the transmission.
     
  8. kingjj
    Joined: Jan 5, 2007
    Posts: 9

    kingjj
    Member

    It's a 2002. Beings I got the whole truck I will reuse everything I can. I'm just lookig for advice on how to do it and not make huge mistakes.
     
  9. Hanksville Hot Rods
    Joined: Oct 23, 2006
    Posts: 246

    Hanksville Hot Rods
    Alliance Vendor
    from Denver-ish

    Kingjj, we have motor mounts and a trans crossmember for installing a 4.6L SOHC Mod Motor into the '49-'51 shoeboxes. We also have log-style stainless steel headers to fit the 4.6 with the stock steering box.

    Everything fits well but the biggest issue is the cross-steer link behind the crossmember. Our kits work with the stock steering but require the engine to be mounted a little higher than a typical SBC or SBF, also requiring some cutting to the trans tunnel. Still plenty of room for the motor under the stock hood. I believe there is room under the hood for the Lightning blower and T-body with our kits on the stock steering. If you have a MII suspension then there's plenty of room since the motor can be mounted lower.

    We haven't tried this kit on a 5.4 SOHC but if you want more details, please check out our Products page and feel free to pm me or call the shop ph number.

    http://www.hanksvillehotrods.com/gui/content.asp?w=pages&r=177&pid=201

    Hank
     
  10. AnimalAin
    Joined: Jul 20, 2002
    Posts: 3,416

    AnimalAin
    Member

    The key to the installation is to make the computer think it is still in the truck. Seems simple until you try to do it, but it is certainly not impossible.
     
  11. tjm73
    Joined: Feb 17, 2006
    Posts: 3,558

    tjm73
    Member

    The 5.4 SOHC with blower on top and the throttlebody on top of that is TALL. Do some measurements and make sure it will fit vertically. You may need ot do some reconfiguration of things or it may not fit even under a hood.

    Muscle Mustang & Fast Fords (a magazine) put one in an 86 Mustang and it stuck at least a full 12"+ out of the 2.5" cowl induction hood. So the engien was at least 16ish inches taller than a OEM EFI 302/5.0 in the same car. THe 5.4 SOHC is really tall.
     
  12. Hanksville Hot Rods
    Joined: Oct 23, 2006
    Posts: 246

    Hanksville Hot Rods
    Alliance Vendor
    from Denver-ish

    tjm, the non-blown 5.4s aren't overly tall, but you're right, with the M112 and top-mounted t-body the Lightning and Harley 5.4s make for a really tall package.

    With the stock crossmember and steering linkage, there is about 11" from the 5.4's manifold mounting surface on the heads up to the hood on a shoebox, assuming the hood isn't pancaked. Using the MII suspension will give about 3" more clearance, more if you give the crossmember a serious drop.

    Off-topic a little, try shoehorning the 5.4 DOHC motor in there...the height isn't so much of a problem as the width. ;)

    BTW Mizlplix, I'd like to talk with ya. I'm always looking for additional knowledge on these motors. I'll pm ya.

    Hank
     

    Attached Files:

  13. 50Fraud
    Joined: May 6, 2001
    Posts: 10,099

    50Fraud
    Member Emeritus

    I can't speak to the difficulty of the install, but as the owner of a Lightning AND a shoebox, it would sure be a bitchin' combination!

    I'd sure use the Lightning trans if it's feasible; it just works great behind that engine.
     
  14. OGNC
    Joined: May 13, 2003
    Posts: 1,194

    OGNC
    Member Emeritus

    Steve Stillwell put one in a 56 F-100

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]
     
  15. Fraz
    Joined: Mar 3, 2001
    Posts: 1,818

    Fraz
    Member
    from Dixon, MO

    After dealing with pretty much rebuilding one from the shortblock up, I'd say hell no. Worked for a good friend who has an auto repair shop this summer, and a lady came in with a 5.4 that was missing. $1300 later she was out the door. The drivers side head ate the threads outta 3 of the 4 sparkplug holes, and the passenger side had 2 holes going bad. This on a 2003 F-150, stock, all factory/dealer work done before the warranty expired.

    It is possible that the dealer stripped the heads when they put in the plugs, but they let go after 40k miles, I doubt that it woulda lasted that long.

    I hate those damn motors. Took all flippin day to get timing set up right, we'd get one side right and the other side'd be 1 tooth off, then vice versa.
     
  16. those 5.4 have a habbit of blowing the plugs out. You have to check them often because as stated the heads cost mucho dollars. As for the wiring of that motor the guy to talk to is Rich at SUPERIOR CUSTOM IN FA. 727 6972951. He's doing a dohc 4.6 for me and has done tons of these Ford motors. I had tried to put a lightning motor in a 60 ford wagon and it was so tall it would have needed a 6 in hood scoop. Had to switch to a cobra 4.6 dohc .
     

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.