Register now to get rid of these ads!

T-5 Transmission to SBC ... How?

Discussion in 'The Hokey Ass Message Board' started by tdfsu, Oct 31, 2006.

  1. 53sled
    Joined: Jul 5, 2005
    Posts: 5,817

    53sled
    Member
    from KCMO

    not ALL 4 cylinders suffer from f-word parts, the 2.2 pos s10 ******s are wrong, earlier 2.5 stuff will fit. Might not live behind a v8, but it fits. 10" clutch came in early 80s 2wd jeeps. 9" and 11" are gm sourced.
     
  2. raven
    Joined: Aug 19, 2002
    Posts: 4,707

    raven
    Member

    Will the guts from a 6cyl. Jeep T-5 be able to hold up to a mild V-8?
    Can I put them in an S-10 case?
    r
     
  3. 53sled
    Joined: Jul 5, 2005
    Posts: 5,817

    53sled
    Member
    from KCMO

    Robin, its not the guts that fail, the side load on one of the shafts blows the case on non-wc trans. supposedly the world cl*** case has thicker ribs and bearings instead of bushings on that intermediate shaft, but having never ACTUALLY done it, I could be wrong. there's a site, 5-speeds.com I think, that is smarter than me.
     
  4. Danimal
    Joined: Apr 23, 2006
    Posts: 4,150

    Danimal
    Member

    Thanks all, I'll check out the Stovebolt and Inliners sites. I want to put this behind my 235 to start with. Sounds like I can't use my stock bell housing, is that right?

    The search is on. Well, it's 20 miles from here. The ****ering on price is on! THEN we'll go for the V8 one next.
     
  5. Flat Ernie
    Joined: Jun 5, 2002
    Posts: 8,406

    Flat Ernie
    Tech Editor

    It's a combo of the side-loads & gear ratios - the lower gear ratios provide greater leverage to try & force the gears apart. The aluminum case is a weak-link of the design - not that it fails, rather, it lets the gears try to separate.

    AFAIK, the cases aren't significantly different at all between WC & NWC.
     
  6. Ghostrdr
    Joined: Oct 24, 2006
    Posts: 374

    Ghostrdr
    Member
    from Missouri

    I keep hearing about everyone using the T5 and always wondered about the predecessor, the 4+3 thing they used in Vettes. For some reason I always heard the T5 was a little weak for preformance use. Mustang guys use thme but they are highly modified I thought.
     
  7. cadillac dave
    Joined: Mar 17, 2006
    Posts: 669

    cadillac dave
    Member

    there is an article in the #18 nov. 2006 " ol' skool rodz" magazine. lays it all out. but i must say after reading it i am more confused than ever. cadillac dave
     
  8. Devin
    Joined: Dec 28, 2004
    Posts: 2,437

    Devin
    Member
    from Napa, CA

    In mocking up the drivetrain on my roadster, I switched from the NWC T5 (from an S10) I originaly intended on using to a saginaw 4 speed. The trans will bolt right into the bellhousing fine. The thing to consider though is that the tail shaft of the T5 is a couple inches longer then on the saginaw. You might need to adjust your driveshaft length etc.
     
  9. ford4chevy
    Joined: Oct 10, 2006
    Posts: 43

    ford4chevy
    BANNED
    from Sanger, CA

    no just spline count 80"s gmc astro van has the disk you need
     
  10. Ghostrdr
    Joined: Oct 24, 2006
    Posts: 374

    Ghostrdr
    Member
    from Missouri

    The NWc T5 was rated at only 265 Ft-Lbs of torque, that was my concern, even the WC had a max torque rating of 300Ft-Lbs. though I am sure with engineering safety factoirs they might survive under 350Ft-Lbs for a while.
     

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.