Register now to get rid of these ads!

Gasser Trans question

Discussion in 'The Hokey Ass Message Board' started by Gasserman, Mar 13, 2007.

  1. Gasserman
    Joined: Oct 14, 2005
    Posts: 616

    Gasserman
    Member
    from Tulsa OK

    Guys , Need input on which trans to use in my Gasser. I`ve got a Doug Nash 5 speed and a TCI C6 with a 10" converter . I can`t figure which to use , The car is a `60 Falcon with straight axle, 9" rear with 4.86 spool. 351C with Hilborn stack injectors, it`s a built engine 12.5 comp and the good stuff in it. I want to do a little street and strip with it. Need ideas which to use. Gasserman
     
  2. blackrat40
    Joined: Apr 19, 2006
    Posts: 1,167

    blackrat40
    Member Emeritus

    Real hot rods have 3 pedals IMHO
     
  3. triton6972
    Joined: Apr 3, 2006
    Posts: 179

    triton6972
    Member

    Standards are funner to drive. And more efficient than an auto.
     
  4. swaybelly321
    Joined: Oct 2, 2006
    Posts: 14

    swaybelly321
    Member

    Figure on that C6 to consume about 70 hp. I am in the process of changing my 71 Mustang to a manual, the C6 just eats too much HP, and is very heavy to boot. Plus as said above, kickin' & stickin' is a lot more fun.

    Stevo
     
  5. Ford Freak
    Joined: Jan 5, 2005
    Posts: 827

    Ford Freak
    Member

    Go with the 5 speed! Lots more FUN!! I have a 4 spd toploader in my 60 Falcon wagon, and its a ball to drive. I know I would have been bored with an automatic after about a month. Mine also has a Cleveland, and straight axle . Got any pics of yours?

    Bernie
     
  6. Gasserman
    Joined: Oct 14, 2005
    Posts: 616

    Gasserman
    Member
    from Tulsa OK

    I dont know, I bet the Nash is heavier than the C6 . I`ve got a 40# flywheel & blowproof bellhousing plus the Nash is about 135#`s. I`ll post some pictures as soon as I can reduce their size, too big to post here. Gasserman
     
  7. easy j
    Joined: Dec 20, 2006
    Posts: 21

    easy j
    Member

    go with the standard way funner and easier to fix if anything goes wrong
     
  8. I love manual transmissions myself, but one thing to consider is your cars handling. Your falcon (short wheel base) with a hilborn injected 351 (stout motor) and straight axel could make for a handfull to drive.
    Dont get me wrong, the doug nash 5-speed would be cool. But you might need both hands to keep her on the straight and narrow.
     
  9. Omega
    Joined: Jul 11, 2006
    Posts: 874

    Omega
    Member
    from Mass

    c6 will consume so much horsepower! the internals were built to stand up to ford big blocks, so they require some torque to spin team that up with a 9inch which also takes some power to spin. Now that car has the power to spin them both, but thats valuble horsepower! go with the stick... its way more fun when you can controll a race engine with 1 hand and 2 feet. :)
     
  10. AnimalAin
    Joined: Jul 20, 2002
    Posts: 3,416

    AnimalAin
    Member

    4.86 may be way more gear than you will need with that much motor and a Nash five speed. The five gear will be more fun, but I hope you can science out the suspension to make it hook. In the dark ages, a substantial number of real gas coupes used automatic transmissions (in the era before trans brakes) to go quick consistently.
     
  11. Gasserman
    Joined: Oct 14, 2005
    Posts: 616

    Gasserman
    Member
    from Tulsa OK

    Guys , My `63 Falcon had a 351C with a C4 trans and 5.43 gears in a 9" . It also had 14x32 Goodyears and run in the high 10`s to low a 11`s depending on the track . I`m running a shorter slick on this car so I went with the 4.86`s . Gasserman
     
  12. rodknocker
    Joined: Jan 31, 2006
    Posts: 2,265

    rodknocker

    you'll go faster with the c6
     
  13. DeucePhaeton
    Joined: Sep 10, 2003
    Posts: 1,015

    DeucePhaeton
    Member

    Take it from a guy with a pile of automatic. Go with the extra pedal guys.
     
  14. texoutsider
    Joined: Jul 6, 2005
    Posts: 826

    texoutsider
    Member
    from Frisco, Tx

    Been running a Jerico in our ole red Ford for 10 seasons.........9.60s @140 plus..........FE /427 type engine, carbs, 3350 pounds pullin 31x10.5w......and a 5.00 gear....shifting at 7600.........goes thru the traps at around 7500............no other way to fly. Generally put both hands on the wheel around the 1000 ft mark...........just in time to drive by most of those automatics..........lol
    Mark
     
  15. Gasserman
    Joined: Oct 14, 2005
    Posts: 616

    Gasserman
    Member
    from Tulsa OK

    Ok Guys , You convinced me . I ordered the rest of the missing 5 speed parts .So it`s now time to rig up the clutch pedal. Gasserman
     
  16. Yo Baby
    Joined: Jul 11, 2004
    Posts: 2,811

    Yo Baby
    Member

    Fuck all that I'll build ya a glide and trade ya for that ol brokedown Nash.
     
  17. Redneck Smooth
    Joined: Apr 19, 2004
    Posts: 1,344

    Redneck Smooth
    Member
    from Cincinnati

    This post brings up an interesting question. I don't know much about real old gassers, but I've heard that they often used hydramatic auto trannies with some means of controlling how hard it shifts by altering the amount of pressure and this was done from the cockpit. Is this possible on a 4-speed hydro? Is it practical on a street car i.e. will it blow up the tranny?
     

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.