Register now to get rid of these ads!

mid 50s taildraggers

Discussion in 'The Hokey Ass Message Board' started by north coast greaser, Mar 19, 2007.

  1. Cronk Design
    Joined: Nov 1, 2005
    Posts: 449

    Cronk Design
    Member
    from Minnesota

    whats the history/story behind "taildraggers"? i like the look and attitude of these cars alot and was curious how it all started.

    i'm gonna be getting my '56 royal lancer this weekend and thought some "inspirational" pics of some mid-50s cars (they dont have to be mopars) draggin rear bumpers would be kinda cool to get some ideas for my car.

    i did a search and found a thread with mostly fat-fendered cars and not a whole lot of the mid-50s cars. is there a reason that most are of the earlier vintage?


    -ncg
     
  2. stickylifter
    Joined: Feb 21, 2005
    Posts: 1,299

    stickylifter
    Member
    from Detroit

    btt - anyone got pics?

    I haven't seen a lot of 50s taildraggers. The style was really popular with later 30s and 40s cars but I think that the styles had changed in the 50s and 60s with the bigger cars to just have them low all the way around.

    I have 50 Fleetline that I chopped, and I'm going for a taildragger stance, with the rear fenders shaved clean and the tail lights in the bumperettes. I haven't seen anyone who's done it (although I'm sure I can't be the first). So maybe we'll get some pics...
     
  3. The style came and went a bunch of times during the era that we contribute to traditional rods. I think it was most popular with the custom crowd pre-war and a lot of the '50s body styles didn't really lend themselves well to the style.

    That's not to say that it wasn't done and it probably had a lot to do with the area where you lived as to wether it was the in thing to do or not. I can think of a lot of '50s model cars that would look pretty smooth layed back on their tail and some that would just look dumb that way.

    On into the mid to later '60s some of the street racers at least in the NW were dumping the rear and leaving the front alone. They called it a power rake and many thought it was good for traction.

    Sticky lifter a slope back sedan would be an excellent choice for ass draggin' and I have seen a few done that way over the years.
     
  4. Chili Phil
    Joined: Jan 15, 2004
    Posts: 7,597

    Chili Phil
    Member

    I don't know what you mean by Taildragger, exactly. In the late fifties some people used the accepted custom style of the forties and early fifties on contemporary cars. But mid fifties American cars are heavily influnced by the custom guys like Cushenberry, the Alexander Brothers, and of course the King of the Kustomizers, George Barris. You don't need much to give them the notion of speed and visual movement that the Taildragger look is about. In fact, IMO, skirts and a down in the back stance seldom work for a car as late as yours.

    After saying that I want to make a possitive contribution. Take a photo of your car, cut the body at the wheelwells and bottom of the car to seperate the wheels so you can play with the stance. You might change your mind. That Lancer could be a really nice mild custom. I suggest you try a California French Rake. Down in front a lot and the rear a bit less. With the fins, it'll look right. You're starting with a pretty neat car there. Good luck with it.
     
  5. J.D.
    Joined: Oct 1, 2004
    Posts: 799

    J.D.
    Member
    from Clovis, CA

    Check out http://www.kustomsillustrated.com they have alot of kustoms from the 50's I wouldn't really call them taildraggers. buy an issue and see what you like and go from there
     
  6. Cronk Design
    Joined: Nov 1, 2005
    Posts: 449

    Cronk Design
    Member
    from Minnesota

    hey thanks for the replies. yeah, i didnt know for sure if it would work on my car with the fins, but i do like the "stance" it gives. it will definently be lowered all around (though i dont know if it has torsion bars or coils in front?)

    i have seen a couple early 50s chevys dropped heavy in the rear, and i think the rear fenders help with this kinda stance.

    i'll have to cut up a couple pics and maybe post a "photoshop" request on here and see what everyone comes up with.

    thanks
    if ya have any pics, feel free to post 'em up.

    ncg
     
  7. knuckle
    Joined: Jan 29, 2005
    Posts: 104

    knuckle
    Member
    from Missery

    I think it would look good.

    quikie chop...

    [​IMG]
    a little off the top
    [​IMG]
     
  8. mazdaslam
    Joined: Sep 9, 2004
    Posts: 2,524

    mazdaslam
    Member

  9. Cronk Design
    Joined: Nov 1, 2005
    Posts: 449

    Cronk Design
    Member
    from Minnesota

    knuckle, that chop looks great.

    hmmm, i'd have to find a pair of skirts then. not too bad though.

    those links have alot of good pics on them.
    thanks guys

    ncg
     
  10. Go for the taildrag look,if you dont like it you can always put it back. Experiment and have fun.
     
  11. stickylifter
    Joined: Feb 21, 2005
    Posts: 1,299

    stickylifter
    Member
    from Detroit

  12. mikes51
    Joined: Oct 4, 2001
    Posts: 2,195

    mikes51
    Member

    Automotive royalty:)

    [​IMG]
     
  13. I always wondered what brought this style about. I remember when mini trucks were all the rage 20 years ago, and they were easily lowered by just cranking down the front torsion bars. I would see full size trucks lowered only in the rear(not including trucks in magazines) and figured those guys didn't have the skill/money to do the front.
     
  14. stickylifter
    Joined: Feb 21, 2005
    Posts: 1,299

    stickylifter
    Member
    from Detroit

    Yeah, thank god those things have gone away.


    :)
     
  15. This is all I have on this computer but I have over 4000 pics on discs at home of mid 50's "taildraggers". Might not be exactly what you are looking for....
     

    Attached Files:

  16. Cronk Design
    Joined: Nov 1, 2005
    Posts: 449

    Cronk Design
    Member
    from Minnesota

    kustom55, is that your car? if ya got time later, please send me some of those 4000 pics you got at home. or just post 'em here.

    you all can plan on seeing/hearing the '56 Mopar at "Back to the 50's" this june, in St.Paul, MN. i'll post up some pics this weekend when i get her home.

    -ncg
     
  17. Squablow
    Joined: Apr 26, 2005
    Posts: 18,388

    Squablow
    Member

    Your car will have coils in front and parallel leafs in the rear.

    Sorry I didn't get back to you on it, but I still have that back seat if you need it.
     
  18. Cronk Design
    Joined: Nov 1, 2005
    Posts: 449

    Cronk Design
    Member
    from Minnesota

    good to know about the coils. thanks.
    squablow, also sent you PM.

    -ncg
     
  19. Silhouettes 57
    Joined: Dec 9, 2006
    Posts: 2,791

    Silhouettes 57
    Member

    Here's a mid fifties Ford Coupe, a '53 owned by Buzz Mohr (a H.A.M.B. member) when it was blue and the color now.
     

    Attached Files:

  20. LiL' NiCk
    Joined: Oct 15, 2002
    Posts: 722

    LiL' NiCk
    Member

    Historically,,,I believe the taildraggin' style was very poplular in the west coast & among the mexican or latino crowd. Zootsuits or pachucos. The chevy became popular due to its affordable nature. The lean-back,,,,low n slow appearance also reflected their way of life & personal style. Many cruisers in the late 40's & early 50s,, could not afford expensive lowering methods--So often times sand bags were used to drop the ass - givin the low and slow, cruisin feel. I too hope to make my chevy a "tail dragger" as well.I am slso interested in seeing a few of those "4,000" taildraggin pix,,,but in early chebby models. -nick
     
  21. Kustomike
    Joined: Jan 16, 2006
    Posts: 535

    Kustomike
    Member

    ...
     

    Attached Files:

  22. Damn, I really should re-read most post for errors....I meant 400 not 4000. I started to go thru some discs last night, just limited on time
     
  23. pasadenahotrod
    Joined: Feb 13, 2007
    Posts: 11,772

    pasadenahotrod
    Member
    from Texas

    Taildraggers? The above pictures are of cars lowered all around, aren't they? I detect no rake from front to rear at all. The front tires are all jammed up in the wheelwells.
     
  24. Cronk Design
    Joined: Nov 1, 2005
    Posts: 449

    Cronk Design
    Member
    from Minnesota

    400.......4000? its all the same to me. post 'em up when you get time...no hurry.

    ncg
     

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.