Register now to get rid of these ads!

57 packard wagon...suggestions?

Discussion in 'The Hokey Ass Message Board' started by oddrodgarage, Mar 13, 2007.

  1. rixrex
    Joined: Jun 25, 2006
    Posts: 1,433

    rixrex
    Member

    general rule that I go by is ten percent are left of whatever...(so if 57 Fords outsold 57 Chevys why are 57 Fords so hard to find?)
     
  2. studeclunker
    Joined: Mar 17, 2007
    Posts: 4

    studeclunker
    Member
    from No. Cal.

    Have you considered restoring this car as it originally was? There are only around a hundred of these left. If you contact the Studebaker Driver's Club website at this location, you can get all the help you need to get parts and ***istance with your car:

    http://www.studebakerdriversclub.com/index.asp

    There are quite a few Studebaker owners who also like to trick out their cars. This one however, is quite a rare car. Believe me, your 289 with a Paxton on it is one fire breathing monster. Just ask Ted Harbit.
     
  3. repoguy
    Joined: Jul 27, 2002
    Posts: 2,085

    repoguy
    Member

    I wouldn't do anything to that car that isn't reversable.

    The standard answer from most guys around here is "slam it! bag it! Astros!" etc, etc, but then a lot of guys on here who would say the same thing if you were talking about a 79 Olds Vista Cruiser wagon or an 82 Toyota Corolla. My point is that not everything is meant to be slammed and bagged.
    Some cars are meant to be "stepping stones", you know, fixed up a little, and then sold to an enthusiast of that specific brand for a good deal more than you paid, giving you the cash base to buy what you really want. Plus there is something to be said for saving rare cars and keeping them for posterity. Some dudes here will argue "**** that, chop up anything and everything you can get your hands on", but watch them all cringe, cry, kick, and scream when one of THEIR automotive icons is destroyed.

    That's a rare car, in fact I don't think I've ever seen one. I'd figure out what it's worth in good condition before you go ****ing it up. If you start cutting it, and then find out that some dude in that Packard club would have given you big money for it, you'll be kicking yourself in the ***.

    Either way, good score. 1800 is CHEAP for that one. Did the stude motor come in that thing, or is it a transplant? Packards are a subject on which I am ignorant.
     
  4. Chopped26
    Joined: May 29, 2006
    Posts: 358

    Chopped26
    Member

    If the car is as rare as it sounds I think I would turn it over for a good price then use the money to fund and build a not so rare ride
     
  5. studeclunker
    Joined: Mar 17, 2007
    Posts: 4

    studeclunker
    Member
    from No. Cal.

    Actually, there were less than a thousand of this car ***embled. Out of that, there might be ten percent around. I would say far less. The next year (58) was even rarer at less than two hundred ***embled. check out this (58) beauty dug out of a barn recently:
    http://s175.photobucket.com/albums/w133/ctauto_2007/

    The current owner's working an offer on it currently in the low twenties.

    Yes, the Studebaker engine is the original in this car. That's the big problem with the 57-58 Packards. They're just dressed up Studebakers. The Packard collectors hate them. Hence very few of them have survived. So Studebaker fanciers like me are the ones who cherish them. I really wish this car had come to me. I would have loved it just as it is. The '57 Packards are up in my top five of the fifties cars.
     
  6. studeclunker
    Joined: Mar 17, 2007
    Posts: 4

    studeclunker
    Member
    from No. Cal.

  7. repoguy
    Joined: Jul 27, 2002
    Posts: 2,085

    repoguy
    Member

  8. Sweet cruiser, real rare... I'd sell it to me. If that isn't what you were thinkin', I DO have a complete blower setup, (that car came from the factory with it), for that car, that year.... I'd restore it, it's just one of those cars that deserves it.....
     
  9. Corrections;

    First, none of them had 352's in 'em. They all had Studebaker 289 engines, with a Packard serial number. This car was, (as ALL '57 & '58 Packards were), a very well optioned Studebaker, "real" Packards were gone after '56. Second, no Studebaker ever had torsion bar, (auto, self-leveling), suspension, just the '55 and '56 Packards had that.
     
  10. daddy-o63
    Joined: Mar 15, 2007
    Posts: 224

    daddy-o63
    Member

    i agree with repoguy.nice car,dont f it up.get it runnin nice,lower it,drive it.you can always raise it back up and sell it to a collector/restorer/purist type
     

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.