Register now to get rid of these ads!

11:1 compression and pump gas?

Discussion in 'The Hokey Ass Message Board' started by Bull, Jun 27, 2007.

  1. Bull
    Joined: Mar 17, 2006
    Posts: 2,288

    Bull
    Member

    I've got the opportunity to buy a 30 over 289 Ford long block with 11:1 Ross pistons, a small RV cam and ported 302 heads to replace my blown 302. Will 11:1 be pump gas friendly? Does this sound like a streetable combination?
     
  2. SinisterCustom
    Joined: Feb 18, 2004
    Posts: 8,277

    SinisterCustom
    Member

    I don't think so.....unless you swap in a bigger cam to bleed off some cyl pressure......and retard the timing.........
     
  3. Dakota
    Joined: Jan 21, 2004
    Posts: 1,535

    Dakota
    Member
    from Beulah, ND

    THe motor in my Edsel is 10.5:1 and it barely likes 92 outa the pump...
     
  4. 54chop
    Joined: Jul 12, 2005
    Posts: 167

    54chop
    Member

    1970 351W heads flow pretty well on a 289 and they would drop compression probably by a point or so over the 289 heads that those piston's compression ratio was calculated (by Ross).
     
  5. Bull
    Joined: Mar 17, 2006
    Posts: 2,288

    Bull
    Member

    Damn . . . this is a fresh rebuilt long block with a C4 for $1500. Seems almost too good to p*** up but won't do me any good if it runs like **** on pump gas.
     
  6. Bull
    Joined: Mar 17, 2006
    Posts: 2,288

    Bull
    Member

    It has lightly ported 68 302 HP heads if that would make a difference.
     
  7. Wesley
    Joined: Aug 12, 2006
    Posts: 1,670

    Wesley
    Member

    I have been able to get away with 11 to 1 compression on pump gas. To do it you have to make sure that your combustion cambers are smooth so they wont have any hot spots, you will need a cam that bleeds off some of the cranking pressure at low RPMs, flat top pistons, a really good cooling system, and a conservitive advance curve and 93 octane gas. Personally for 1500 bucks I would take a chance. If nothing else you can swap cams, dress the combustion chambers and install thicker head gaskets and still be in for less than building a new engine.
     
  8. Bull
    Joined: Mar 17, 2006
    Posts: 2,288

    Bull
    Member

    Any idea on how much power a setup like this would/should make?
     
  9. toadfrog
    Joined: Dec 2, 2006
    Posts: 299

    toadfrog
    Member
    from Arkansas

    Are the Ross numbers figured on 289 heads or 289hp or 302 heads?????

    D3 or D5 windsor heads flow good and should help scrub off some of the comp.

    Not old school... but running a MSD ignition box (6al or such) will help. Along with the other recommendations.
     
  10. Wyle E Coyote
    Joined: May 24, 2006
    Posts: 442

    Wyle E Coyote
    Member

    I ran a 12.2:1 468 Chevy on the street on pump gas for years without a hitch. There are some tricks to it though. As was stated already, smoothed combustion chambers and pistons, MSD ignition and a large enough cam to bleed off combustion at low RPM. There are a few other things you should be careful of. Be sure your timing curve is set up right and run the carb FAT. 11:1 is doable, but it takes some effort.
     
  11. I ran a 350 horse 396 with a 10.5:1 ratio on regular gas for years. I used to haul a camper and tow a boat with no problem. The secret was my homemade water injection system that would add coolant (water) when the vacuum went below 5" Hg. I also installed a CD ignition system, which is the predecessor of the MSD type units. I am presently running a 454 and a Ford 390 FE ( both with 10:5:1 ) using 94 octane and octane boost. This is just adequate, but with the stock advance the engines will ping under heavy load. When I have the time, I am going to make another water injection unit.
    Bob
     
  12. scottybaccus
    Joined: Mar 13, 2006
    Posts: 4,109

    scottybaccus
    Member

    11:1 is easy enough if you have good fuel and spark control. Also remember that 11:1 is advertised with a given chamber CC and gasket thickness. Do a little research and you should be able to ***emble it at 10.5:1. It will work if you pay attention to details. Add a cam with a bit more overlap for extra insurance. Also keep in mind that heavier cars aggravate the issue. Light weight cars put up with increased compression better.
     

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.