Register now to get rid of these ads!

What year was the ford tube axle on?

Discussion in 'The Hokey Ass Message Board' started by rogue, Jun 27, 2007.

  1. tommy
    Joined: Mar 3, 2001
    Posts: 14,757

    tommy
    Member Emeritus

    Yes the Super bell has a distinctive weld unless it was ground off. I thought I saw a weld.

    [​IMG]

    This is the black roadster I was thinking of. Not a good picture of the axle though.
     
  2. NoSurf
    Joined: Jul 26, 2002
    Posts: 4,664

    NoSurf
    Member

    Tommy- I think that's the Frank Mack T?
     
  3. Since the post has gone this long, I would like to hear some opinions about the rule of no wishbones, hairpins on a tube. I run hairpins on my tube and feel that as long as I dont try to climb a curb, I'll be ok. Ford broke that rule years ago as it seems.

    Hey Trent, hope all is well. Been busy as the normal excuse . Paul, I'll call you tonight. Had an emergency call to acid multiple hand prints off the car today while it's at a show. I need a sign," don't touch my fucking car".
     
  4. Kevin Lee
    Joined: Nov 12, 2001
    Posts: 7,647

    Kevin Lee
    Super Moderator
    Staff Member

    Thing is Ford didn't split the wishbone. So they really didn't break that rule.

    Again I say look to the Pierson or Niekamp cars. And all other mentioned above as well. All split wishbone or hairpin, nearly all street driven. And no major problems that we know of. And I had mentioned just a week or so ago how the Pierson Coupe was flogged on the salt well into the 1980's with a hairpin/tube axle setup. I won't be scared to drive a car set up as such.
     
  5. I agree that it is safe in a hairpin / wishbone setup. If you don't split the bones, I would think that would compound the issue of side to side flex. Splitting the bones would actually be better I think.
     
  6. Royalshifter
    Joined: May 29, 2005
    Posts: 15,696

    Royalshifter
    Moderator
    from California

    Muttley's 39 does not have a Super bell axle it is an original aftermarket from the day. Guaranteed.
     
  7. Justin B
    Joined: Oct 11, 2003
    Posts: 2,279

    Justin B
    Member

    hi jimmy,
    600 is on the cheap side for that setup, but if the guy will take it then.......,

    spindles= $100, brakes w/ buick drums= $400? if in good shape, wishbone= $75-100, spring= $30-50 so he'd be getting the axle for free at that price, and the bare v8-60 axles seem to sell for 350-700. i've got just an axle sitting here that is nickle plated and has some scratches but i've turned down 600 for just the axle, but i've got plans for it and don't want to have to try and find another one as nice as the one i have.

    mordrop or someone else did drop the origional v8-60 axles, i've only seen one, and that's under the front of dave simards 37 woody. i took a good look at it when he was out here a couple weeks back and whoever did the drop did a really nice job, it's only about 2" but it flows really well and the tube just kinda narrows a bit where it was dropped. the suspension on the car hasn't been touched for probably 50 years so it's been in there for awhile, wish i had taken a picture of it now.




    ps. jimmy the machine shop down the street from you hooked me up on the axles for my quickchange today, i've been running around like a chicken with it's head cut off for the last two days trying to find someone with a lathe long enough to cut them for me. my car should finally be a roller again by the end of the weekend.
     
  8. Justin. Sorry I had to bail like that today, I had to go and fix the rpu at the fair and I was not happy. I am glad that worked out for you. That shop does alot of work for us 'cause I can't beat the price. The front axle assembly I think is fairly priced. You should come down tomorrow and see this thing. I have never in my life seen such an abomination of parts cobbling. I am not kidding here. The frame is not even recognizable as a model a. Sad.

    Could you imagine setting one wishbone 1 inch on the inside of the frame, and the other 2 inches outside the frame ? This is the rear point side to side. Yeah.....................
     
  9. Here is a pic that shows a Ford tube axle. An early tube axle with dropped ends is probably a Bell axle. Did they put their ends on the Ford Axle to make a Bell tube axle or fab the whole thing? here is a beautiful Bell axle hanging on the wall at Limeworks, it has I beam middle and dropped tube ends.

    [​IMG]
     
    kidcampbell71 likes this.
  10. Petejoe
    Joined: Nov 27, 2002
    Posts: 12,473

    Petejoe
    Member
    from Zoar, Ohio

    Here is a picture of the axle on my 37.
    It definitely has welded ends. SuperBell??

    [​IMG]
     
  11. Petejoe
    Joined: Nov 27, 2002
    Posts: 12,473

    Petejoe
    Member
    from Zoar, Ohio

  12. My coworker has decided to pass on the axle set up. If anyone is interested in it give me a pm. I have no interest in it and I would like to see another hamber use it, not e-bay it. I will need a price from you, (and don't insult me) to give to the owner and see if he will accept it.............
     
  13. scruff
    Joined: Apr 11, 2004
    Posts: 309

    scruff
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    Here's a picture of the rare Bell/cragar aftermarket tube axle of the early fifties;note that the ends are made flattened to look like a filled axle.
     

    Attached Files:

    kidcampbell71 likes this.
  14. Bruce Lancaster
    Joined: Oct 9, 2001
    Posts: 21,681

    Bruce Lancaster
    Member Emeritus

    "agree that it is safe in a hairpin / wishbone setup. If you don't split the bones, I would think that would compound the issue of side to side flex. Splitting the bones would actually be better I think."

    I'd take issue with that...stock, the parts form a rigid triangle, not needing or able to flex--it is hung at 3 popints, spring ends and ball, and is frr to pivot or move up and down symetrically as needed as a rigid unit. Any split forces some degree of flex in any deflection that is not symmetrical, forcing something in the assembly to flex or twist. And the resulting basically rectangular shape with non-rigid joints to boot is inherently much less rigid than a triangle, especially since the triangle has no moveable joints.
    Splitting was oft necessary for clearance. Some claim a benefit in anti-roll, but since in effect the whole car is being put under twist, with whatever part is weakest doing the actual deflection, the anti-roll effect is untuneable and probably not the same under different conditions...if you need anti-roll, lower the thing and consider a separate anti-roll bar that acts in a controllable manner.
     
    kidcampbell71 likes this.

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.