Register now to get rid of these ads!

flathead intake help

Discussion in 'The Hokey Ass Message Board' started by bobbooth, Jul 8, 2007.

  1. bobbooth
    Joined: Mar 8, 2006
    Posts: 383

    bobbooth
    Member
    from limeyland

    Hi i just picked up a Flathead intake and have no idea what or who its made by the only markings on it are

    " Central pattern and foundry Co,Chicago"

    Does anybody know any info about this it would be much appreciated.Many thanks Bob.
    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
     
  2. Destralo Roach
    Joined: Mar 27, 2006
    Posts: 521

    Destralo Roach
    Member

    Might be for a boat...Roach.
     
  3. RichFox
    Joined: Dec 3, 2006
    Posts: 10,020

    RichFox
    Member Emeritus

    This is a streight out guess, but maybe it was made to mount the two Strombergs that came on the '40? Buick. I see only one has heat and the Buick had one real carburater and one that was more of an air valve secondary, with no idle circut or intermediet. Only of use at WOT
     
  4. Crestliner
    Joined: Dec 31, 2002
    Posts: 3,033

    Crestliner
    Member

    Really don't know other than its for a pre 49 engine. Don't belive its for a boat, as they usually sit at a angle and one carb flange is higher than the other. All buick strombergs that I have seen had a 4 bolt pattern. So leads me to believe its for a early hot rod.
     
  5. RichFox
    Joined: Dec 3, 2006
    Posts: 10,020

    RichFox
    Member Emeritus

    I have a Buick Two - Two manifold and the Strombergs are three bolt same as a Ford. Overall size of the carb body is larger. Now i am not saying the manifold is for a Buick, of course. I am saying it is for some progressive two - two setup, hence the carb heat to only one-primary- carb. This is the same as the Buick in principal. Therefor I am guessing that it may have been made with adapting the Buick carbs to a Ford.
     
  6. flatoz
    Joined: May 11, 2003
    Posts: 3,237

    flatoz
    Member

    Nearly looks like they have copied an original intake and just added the front carb mounting pad on risers. Interesting intake, looks little ugly as they havent made the front mount the same as the rear, gives it a 'homemade' look.

    cool none the same.
     
  7. bobbooth
    Joined: Mar 8, 2006
    Posts: 383

    bobbooth
    Member
    from limeyland

    Hi, Yes it does look like someone cast a second mount on it but when you look real close it has been made like that.It definately is for a early ford flathead as i know the motor it came off .If the foundry casting logo is on it surely they must have done a run of them and not just a one off.I agree it does look a little odd in the fact that the 1st runner is "round"in affect against the rear one which is a little boxy/stock looking.bob.
     
  8. flatoz
    Joined: May 11, 2003
    Posts: 3,237

    flatoz
    Member

    I have asked a mate of mine if he has heard of it, as he has a few intakes and has alot of knowledge on them.
     
  9. RichFox
    Joined: Dec 3, 2006
    Posts: 10,020

    RichFox
    Member Emeritus

    Look at the thing. The rear carb mount has exhaust heat for drivablity on the street. Just like stock manifolds. The front mount has no exhaust heat riser because it is made for use under higher throttle openings. See race manifolds do not have carb heat. Street manifolds do. This is an attempt to have the best of both worlds. Pretty rare I bet and way cool.
     
  10. banjorear
    Joined: Jul 30, 2004
    Posts: 4,819

    banjorear
    Member

    Pretty neat stuff. Keep us posted on what this turns out to be.

    I've never seen one before. I'm not bragging, but I'm kinda into flathead intakes and that is the first one I've ever seen.

    Could you take a shot if it from the bottom?
     
  11. bobbooth
    Joined: Mar 8, 2006
    Posts: 383

    bobbooth
    Member
    from limeyland

    Thanks for the help guys keep em coming.Here,s a picture of the underneath, Bob.
    [​IMG]
     
  12. banjorear
    Joined: Jul 30, 2004
    Posts: 4,819

    banjorear
    Member

    I think Rich Fox is right. Who(m) ever designed it, was trying to get heat for the street with the rear carb. & a "cold" intake charge with the front. It does not appear to be an add on for the rear carb is too far back.

    You got a pretty neat & (I would ***ume) rare intake there.
     
  13. Bruce Lancaster
    Joined: Oct 9, 2001
    Posts: 21,681

    Bruce Lancaster
    Member Emeritus

    I think its basic design is an artifact of a different origin...look at the notch in the front runners.
    Ford supplied hu****ous gnerators requiring setback carbs for use on ambulances and such...some of the Ford 1930's oversize generators had a stepped design that could use just that notch. Other suppliers also supplied non-Ford big generator rigs for special vehicles, and by the forties there was even an (also gigantic) rectified alternator for emergency vehicles...
    I've never found a Ford listing for the setback manifolds, and I think I've got more early V8 catalogs than anyone else I know...so they likely were supplied from outside.
    I think this is based on tooling for a 1930's-'40's Ford based emergency vehicle, and someone clever dragged out the old stuff and modified the basic tooling for the second tower to cash in on the speed equipment market.
     
  14. bobbooth
    Joined: Mar 8, 2006
    Posts: 383

    bobbooth
    Member
    from limeyland

    Great ideas guys this is turning out to be really interesting. Whats been puzzling me is the fact that someone has commisioned the foundry to cast this up as is evidenced by the foundry castining mark that would imply that someone has the rights/design to it ,surely the foundry haven't tried to do it on it's own especially if it were to be Ford design without consent?. I'll try and find out more about the foundry as there is no company listed as that now in Chicago. Bob
     
  15. Bruce Lancaster
    Joined: Oct 9, 2001
    Posts: 21,681

    Bruce Lancaster
    Member Emeritus

    Another dating point: The two plugs for vacuum are typical pre-'39 or so Ford. This might set original date, OR just be careful provision for easy retrofit.
     
  16. bobbooth
    Joined: Mar 8, 2006
    Posts: 383

    bobbooth
    Member
    from limeyland

    Spent the last few hours trawling the net can't seem to find anything other than the fact that the foundry/company got done in 41 over some dodgy aluminium!!.bob.
     
  17. BEDSLEAD
    Joined: Aug 4, 2005
    Posts: 167

    BEDSLEAD
    Member
    from ONTARIO CA

    check with dennis from obrians he knows about some of the early foundries. his hame name is buick59
     
  18. bobbooth
    Joined: Mar 8, 2006
    Posts: 383

    bobbooth
    Member
    from limeyland

    Will do, Anybody else got any ideas?,bob.
     
  19. bobbooth
    Joined: Mar 8, 2006
    Posts: 383

    bobbooth
    Member
    from limeyland

    just been informed that J C Whitney might have sold these "No name" manifolds years ago? Does this ring any bells with anyone? Other than that just turning up blanks.Bob
     
  20. bobbooth
    Joined: Mar 8, 2006
    Posts: 383

    bobbooth
    Member
    from limeyland

    update:It seems that it must have been made prior to oct41 as this is the last bit of info i can find on the company that cast it due to them being stopped from trading for being caught using undeclared alluminium (unless anyone knows otherwise)which would tally with what Bruce said reguarding the vac*** take-offs identifying it prior to 1939.Definitaley a mystery but interesting all the same.Bob.
     

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.