Register now to get rid of these ads!

216 Chevy hop-ups

Discussion in 'The Hokey Ass Message Board' started by Coby, Aug 24, 2007.

  1. Coby
    Joined: Oct 2, 2006
    Posts: 33

    Coby
    Member

    After lookin through the stovebolt intakes thread I was wondering if a 216 is worth hopping up? Cams, intakes headers... fill me in, cuz I've heard they're kind of doggish and was hoping to learn a little bit.

    Thanks Coby
     
  2. xderelict
    Joined: Jul 30, 2006
    Posts: 2,475

    xderelict
    Member Emeritus

  3. OLLIN
    Joined: Aug 25, 2006
    Posts: 3,150

    OLLIN
    Member

    no.

    hey coby. sorry, they look cool but I wouldn't do it again. Im sure guys will disagree but the oiling is not full pressure and they are expensive to rebuild, the gas mileage, the parts should you break down wouldn't be available everywhere. the horsepower.. etc. etc. especially in a closed hooded car.
    my vote is no.
     
  4. Coby
    Joined: Oct 2, 2006
    Posts: 33

    Coby
    Member

    awlrighty then. Thanks for the feedback guys. I'm not gonna be driving til February and I'll see how I like it then. Ollin, weren't you runnin a 235? Those seem to be the way to go. When did they switch over to pressurized oiling?
     
  5. droplord49
    Joined: Jan 12, 2004
    Posts: 1,708

    droplord49
    Member
    from Bryan, Tx

    54 was the year Chevy went to full pressure
     
  6. If you got it, use it.

    It depends on your power to work ratio. If you want musclecar power and EFI reliability, then p*** on it.

    If you want a "trad" ride with the same (ish) power as a Flathead Ford, then do it. It won't be easy, it won't be cheap. But, it'll be fun and you'll learn something too. I've got one to stick in a modified someday. (Read, someday. :) )

    Jay
     
  7. OLLIN
    Joined: Aug 25, 2006
    Posts: 3,150

    OLLIN
    Member

    yeah, i eventually found a guy with a '54 who was going with a 350/350 setup, and I bought everything off of him. that swaps right in pretty easy, but If it were me I wouldn't do that either, by the time it was all said and done it was pretty $$!
     
  8. old dirt tracker
    Joined: Sep 20, 2006
    Posts: 1,002

    old dirt tracker
    Member
    from phoenix

    it cost money to be tradional. i built a mild 302 jimmy 10 years ago and had 2000.00 in the long block. the best way to soup up a 216 is with a 235 or 261. like it or not cost is one on the reasons for so many 350/350 combos.
     
  9. suavemechanic
    Joined: Mar 30, 2006
    Posts: 33

    suavemechanic
    Member

    hi we just did up a couple for a pair of trucks to be used in a movie ,only a few guys here still do the bottom ends so that wasnt cheap.and we went through a lot of heads before we found the ones without cracks in !
    i d check that out very care fully before sending your bottom end away (we didnt ) i put the carb off a local gm six (holden ,single barrel stromberg) on and was very happy they both ran beautifully and made me proud.
    but slipper bearings would be easier to live with long term...
    cheers
     
  10. Taff
    Joined: Mar 14, 2006
    Posts: 360

    Taff
    Member

    I've got a '54 motor in my '49 sedan and I planned on keeping it. Twin carbs, fenton's , maybe a cam in there. I don't especially want a tarmac scorcher, but a few more miles per hour would be nice.
    Thanks for those links, a few there I hadn't seen before
     
  11. Flop
    Joined: Jun 8, 2006
    Posts: 3,885

    Flop
    Member

    ive never had a straight tmotor before my 47 always had v8s and i have to say its a welcome change . put a tattersfield intake 2 carbs and a set or headers and it made the car 100 percent more enjoyable. yah its still slow but tis fun openng the hood and seein that old piece sittin in there and it sure as hell boggels peoples minds why the old 216 is still there . but its all costs moneeeeey

    also dont be alarmed when ya have a staggering 14 pounds of oil pressure at idle .
     
  12. HEATHEN
    Joined: Nov 22, 2005
    Posts: 9,034

    HEATHEN
    Member
    from SIDNEY, NY

    If you're serious about sticking with the 216, keep your eyes open for a set of rods converted for use with insert bearings. They hold up much better than the stock babbitted rods, especially when under higher than normal stress (such as revving it up to hear your dual gl***packs).
     
  13. Coby
    Joined: Oct 2, 2006
    Posts: 33

    Coby
    Member

    thanks guys, my chevy has a 216 in it and I'm just trying to figure everything out. This is just gonna be my daily until I get a hot rod.

    Thanks again fellas.
     
  14. The '53 Powerglides came with full pressure, not sure about this but the side cover goes all the way over the plugs on the splash motors?
     
  15. OLLIN
    Joined: Aug 25, 2006
    Posts: 3,150

    OLLIN
    Member

    if it runs good, and you are just going to cruise around town, & not your primary form of transportation..and its already in there etc. I say keep it. But if it needs rebuilding etc, just find a 235 or V8 like people said..
     
  16. 63Biscuit
    Joined: Mar 7, 2007
    Posts: 831

    63Biscuit
    Member
    from Hudson, WI

    Of course, you can also get a set of bolt-in engine mounts from Tom Langdon to swap in a later 194-230-250 mill to your ch***is. Yet again, more money then just driving whatcha got.
     

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.