Register now to get rid of these ads!

2.3 Pinto Nastiness!

Discussion in 'The Hokey Ass Message Board' started by pikesan99, Nov 5, 2007.

  1. pikesan99
    Joined: Aug 13, 2002
    Posts: 370

    pikesan99
    Member

    This should be pinto-nasty... a close cousin to "freak-nasty", the ******* love child of "do-the-nasty" and "nasty-as-I-wanna-be".

    How much fun will I have tuning those Webers?

    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]

    Who's going to the Scottsdale Goodguys?
    Pikesan

    (here are the blogs about what I've done)
    Intake build part 1
    Intake build part 2
     
  2. metalshapes
    Joined: Nov 18, 2002
    Posts: 11,130

    metalshapes
    Member

    Nice work...

    Header looks good too.
     
  3. How much fun will I have tuning those Webers? About as much fun as me. Actually, they stay in tune pretty well. I have a set a 44 Webers on a VW and I use to drive it everyday. I never had to mess with them.
     

    Attached Files:

  4. garvinzoom
    Joined: Sep 21, 2007
    Posts: 1,169

    garvinzoom
    Member

    That must be an early Pinto, very good looking engine. That wooden header flange might be a fire hazard though! ;)
     
  5. chromedaddyo
    Joined: Jan 11, 2006
    Posts: 643

    chromedaddyo
    Member
    from Ohio

    Hey look at that Dad!

    A hot rod,,,, and,,,,,,,,it's not powered by a small block Chevy!!!

    Go Man Go!!! I wanna do a Bucket with a 300 Ford 6 cyl!

    HA HA

    Dave
     
  6. mac miller
    Joined: Jan 13, 2007
    Posts: 524

    mac miller
    Member
    from INDY

    Nothing wrong with Pinto engines..... They are actually a blood relative to the race engines of the 30s which used a Ford four cylinder Model T, A or B equipped with aftermarket SOHC heads such as Miller, RAJO, Fronty etc.
    Purty much what a Pinto engine is....
    Here's mine:


    http://albums.photo.epson.com/j/AlbumIndex?u=4029077&a=30206316&f=


    mac miller in INDY
     
  7. Dirty2
    Joined: Jun 13, 2004
    Posts: 8,902

    Dirty2
    Member

    Looks good.
     
  8. brewsir
    Joined: Mar 4, 2001
    Posts: 3,278

    brewsir
    Member

    Bet ya have tons more fun driving it !
     
  9. Chopped50Ford
    Joined: Feb 16, 2003
    Posts: 5,854

    Chopped50Ford
    Alliance Vendor

    that is awesome. Possible motor for next project :)
     
  10. storm king
    Joined: Oct 16, 2007
    Posts: 1,989

    storm king
    Member

    Pinto bangers make excellent engines. I had one in a hot rodded Pinto back in the '70's, it was a quick little vehicle, and bullet proof.
     
  11. 1950ChevySuburban
    Joined: Dec 20, 2006
    Posts: 6,185

    1950ChevySuburban
    Member Emeritus
    from Tucson AZ

    I got two projects at home right now, each one gets a Pinto 2.3

    Looks great Pikesan, and YES I'm going to Scottsdale this year:D
     
  12. pikesan99
    Joined: Aug 13, 2002
    Posts: 370

    pikesan99
    Member

    I can see everyone likes the wooden header flange! I got a special WIG machine to weld it.

    Actually, the real flange has oval ports because otherwise the 1 5/8 tubes would run into the flange bolts. So, to mock things up, I made the wood one. I have the 2.3 head drawing (genuine Ford item!) so it wasn't that bad to make.

    The header is actually for a Ford Small block from Schoenfeld Headers (<- been really cool!). I can't believe how easy it was to adapt to the 2.3. I thought for sure I was doing something wrong! The 1 5/8 stepped to 1 3/4 tubes are with my buddy for TIG'ing now.

    I'll follow up with some performance info. The car was fast enough before, just not that quick. The next step is a custom stall converter, if needed.

    Thanks for the comments! I will be having TONS of fun with it... I hope I run into everyone going to the Scottsdale Goodguys.
    See ya!
     
  13. Bluto
    Joined: Feb 15, 2005
    Posts: 5,113

    Bluto
    Member Emeritus

    Back when the lab was in Signal Hill Bill Stropp's shop was at the top of the street and hill

    Late at night I'd hear a power pull ....... same shrill sound for a week or so
    Sometimes the noise stopped with a bang!

    I asked Bill at morning coffee what the heck was making all that noise...

    Yup they were running several Pinto engines on Autolite's dyno.....and yes some to the end.......dead end

    Those were easier days .... Rent on the lab was $75 a month. The donuts were a dime and in the night you could hear the little motors dancing on the Dyno

    Mert Littlefield was my shop neighbor....... he cleaned carpets as a day job
     
  14. jonny o
    Joined: Oct 26, 2007
    Posts: 836

    jonny o
    Member

    Awesome work.... definitely love the header.
    Mind telling me a little more?

    You ovaled the primary where it will meet the flange, is that correct?
    Think about an adapter plate and a header for a stahl or reher-morrison pattern?

    If you are going for broke, start ripping those accessories off the motor! That's more fan than I would make my smallblock spin!

    Keep at it man, I can't wait to see that header done!
     
  15. pikesan99
    Joined: Aug 13, 2002
    Posts: 370

    pikesan99
    Member

    Yea, I had to oval the primary. I used my high tech ovalling bench vise.

    What's a stahl or reher-morrison pattern?

    As for the fan, this is a street car that I drive alot and I live in AZ. I had a leaking radiator that cause overheating, then FINALLY spent the money getting it fixed. Best money I've spent cause now it doesn't overheat. I grabbed that fan off another 2.3 stocker at the junk yard. It's only a 4 blade fan.

    Thanks for the encouragement!
     
  16. Reverand Greg
    Joined: Oct 18, 2007
    Posts: 199

    Reverand Greg
    Member

    That thing looks great,keep up the good work
     
  17. tjm73
    Joined: Feb 17, 2006
    Posts: 3,680

    tjm73
    Member

    What ****** are you running? C4?
     
  18. pikesan99
    Joined: Aug 13, 2002
    Posts: 370

    pikesan99
    Member

    It's a C3. The C4 to 2.3 motor bell housings are hard to come by. I have one, but I think by the time I rebuild the trans, and pay for a good C4 converter, I could have Hughes (local) build a custom C3 converter. They said about $300.
     
  19. rab71
    Joined: Jan 1, 2007
    Posts: 571

    rab71
    Member

    Can someone please explain to me why the intake does not need a plenum with weber carbs?
     
  20. pikesan99
    Joined: Aug 13, 2002
    Posts: 370

    pikesan99
    Member

    Rab,
    There was a great article by Inglese here: http://www.inglese.com/tech.htm but IT IS DOWN now... maybe try again in a couple days.

    Typically with Webers, you have one carb barrel/cylinder or an "individual runner" system.

    I was gonna try to quote from the article, but I'll wait to get home. Basically, plenum's are bad... the cushion or dampen the intake signal that the carb gets. Without it, the response is supposed to be GREAT!
     
  21. mike c
    Joined: Jan 14, 2006
    Posts: 61

    mike c
    Member

    Regarding Webers on the 2.3 motor. I think there are a couple of places you can get a manifold and run sidedraft 40 DCOE or 45 DCOES'. I have had good luck with sidedraft webers on my Quad4 engine. Take the time to get them jetted right and they are fool proof.
     
  22. jonny o
    Joined: Oct 26, 2007
    Posts: 836

    jonny o
    Member

    Stahl started making flanges to fit big primary tubes on close pattern heads to clear the bolt holes. They will cut anything you can send a pattern for. Something to keep in mind for the future.

    You bolt the flange (with recessed allen head bolts) to the heads original location, then bolt the header to the flange with new larger spacing. They'll get jealous about your fancy shmancy ovaling machine, don't tell them!

    Keep the posts coming!

    [​IMG]
     
  23. pikesan99
    Joined: Aug 13, 2002
    Posts: 370

    pikesan99
    Member

    Hey Jonny O,
    I talked to Stahl cause another guy who frequents HAMB used their header. I called up to order one and Stahl wasn't very friendly. I put them in the "Well then screw you!" file and moved on. Kenny over at Schoenfeld was my man. He helped every time I called, even with ***embly and I think gave me a pretty good deal.

    That adapter is a cool idea though. I had 1 3/4 tubes on my original header. I'd rather have a smaller primary though for better torque. The stepped header I ended up with may be the best of both? We'll see!
     
  24. Webers have gotten a bad rep as being "finicky" and "hard to tune" and I don't really agree with that. If you have a Uni-Syn tool, and good linkage, they should stay in sync for a long time.
    I would consider getting some mesh screeens for the top of the velocity stacks, though. They're cheap, and they will keep the bigger stuff from being ingested into your engine
     
  25. jonny o
    Joined: Oct 26, 2007
    Posts: 836

    jonny o
    Member

    Good decision, if they were all raggy.
    Told you they were jealous of your fancy ovaling machine!
     
  26. pikesan99
    Joined: Aug 13, 2002
    Posts: 370

    pikesan99
    Member

    I do have access to a uni-syn tool... whatever it's called to flow test the carbs individually.

    I've heard all kind of "they ****" to "they're the coolest" about the webers. I know one thing for sure, I'm about to find out first hand!

    Good call on the screens for the stacks... gotta do something...
     

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.