Register now to get rid of these ads!

Head swaps on a Ford 215

Discussion in 'The Hokey Ass Message Board' started by johnny5o, Oct 25, 2007.

  1. johnny5o
    Joined: Jul 13, 2006
    Posts: 11

    johnny5o
    Member

    Are there any head swaps you can do to a 1952-53 ford inline six? I was looking through some shop manuals and it shows in 57 the compression ratio for a 223 got bumped up to 8.0:1 where as mine suffers from a 7:1. I was wondering if this head could bolt up to the 215 block. I've searched and haven't been able to find anything yet so any help would be greatly appreciated.
     
  2. HEATHEN
    Joined: Nov 22, 2005
    Posts: 8,888

    HEATHEN
    Member
    from SIDNEY, NY

    The easiest path to higher compression for you would be to mill the head you've got. They had sufficient meat to withstand a .060 mill, and as far as the later 8:1 head goes, you can't put much faith in factory ratings anyway. Once the horsepower race really got rolling in the mid '50s, most manufacturers got "creative" with their published compression and horsepower figures.
     
  3. johnny5o
    Joined: Jul 13, 2006
    Posts: 11

    johnny5o
    Member

    If you look at both combustion chambers, you can tell the difference right off the bat. The 52-55 chambers were heart shaped voids where as in 57 it looks like the shape of a 64cc SBC head. I wouldn't mind shaving down the head but the original valve to piston clearance was only 0.017"-.019".
    I thought about welding up part of the chamber but there would have to be too much material laid down to the point where it's not worth it.
     
  4. HEATHEN
    Joined: Nov 22, 2005
    Posts: 8,888

    HEATHEN
    Member
    from SIDNEY, NY

    I'm sure that you can mill your current head more than that. I've got an old "How to Hop Up Your Car" manual on the shelf at home; I'll see if I can find it tonight. I know it had a head milling chart in it.
     
  5. johnny5o
    Joined: Jul 13, 2006
    Posts: 11

    johnny5o
    Member

    Thanks. I wouldn't gotten back sooner on this but I just returned to civilization. Let's just say not many places to access the internet in West Virginia.
     
  6. mustangsix
    Joined: Mar 7, 2005
    Posts: 1,452

    mustangsix
    Member

    That clearance number sounds more like the valve lash setting. The valves probably clear the piston by a lot more than than, probably more like .100" or more. If you have the head off, you could easily do a check with some clay. Put a lump on top of the piston, rotate the engine, and the vavles will make an impression on the clay. by measuring the clay you can determine the clearance.

    Also, take a look a the piston-to-deck clearance. Typically the piston on a later Ford six is as much as .020-.030" below the block surface at TDC. The older 215 may be similar. Decking the block by removing that material to get to a zero deck improves both quench and CR. That may yield better performance than just milling the head.
     
  7. HEATHEN
    Joined: Nov 22, 2005
    Posts: 8,888

    HEATHEN
    Member
    from SIDNEY, NY

    The book (copyright 1953) suggests a .080 inch mill for a compression increase of one full ratio over stock.
     
  8. johnny5o
    Joined: Jul 13, 2006
    Posts: 11

    johnny5o
    Member

    As soon as I get my rotating assembly back in I plan on doing the clay test. I thought those valve clearance numbers sounded odd too.
     

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.