Register now to get rid of these ads!

oldsmobile stroker engines....

Discussion in 'The Hokey Ass Message Board' started by rickyracer1962, Nov 12, 2007.

  1. anybody ever build one? i would like to know if anyone has built one using a 394 block with a 4.25 stroke crank. any info would be greatly appreciated!
     
  2. touchdowntodd
    Joined: Jan 15, 2005
    Posts: 4,069

    touchdowntodd
    Member

    394's were stroked like me on prom night... all the time, and by EVERYONE..

    search the rocket threads, there is some info in there, otherwise im sure donwow and the other olds gods will chime in
     
  3. Fresh469
    Joined: Jun 12, 2005
    Posts: 343

    Fresh469
    Member
    from Benton, KY

    not sure about the combo you asked about, but i have heard that you can take a 403 and put a 455 crank in it (after having the main journals machined down) and end up with a 500+ cube engine....
     
  4. Paul
    Joined: Aug 29, 2002
    Posts: 16,986

    Paul
    Editor

    haven't done it myself but talked to a couple different guys who had
    they both said with the 394 you want to limit the stroke to a half inch max,
    for skirt clearance,
    use the Buick 455 rods and of course custom pistons.

    hmm... .125 overbore, .500 stroke.... 475 cubic inches..
     
  5. DON_WOW
    Joined: Feb 14, 2002
    Posts: 218

    DON_WOW
    Member Emeritus

    C-T Automotive sold 5/8s stroker arms ,,lots, used with .060+ bore =476 inches,,,,.125 overbore and the 5/8 arm gives 489 inches. Slight grinding to get 1/16 gap at bottom of bores to clear rods and use of 371 ,,57-58 rods gets you home with throws turned down to 371 size. And number 23 heads are by far the strongest---no beefing needed. Machine shop in midwest ---Terre Haute ---did one for me forty years back way cheaper than C-T price. This shop is still in the know and open. Yeah ,an arm in a 394 has some twist.
     
  6. the crank i'm looking at has 4.25 stroke, 2.25 rod journals. does this sound like a c-t?
     
  7. DON_WOW
    Joined: Feb 14, 2002
    Posts: 218

    DON_WOW
    Member Emeritus

    Could be,, Reath or any other from way back when this was popular, 9/16 stroke with 371 rod size was a standard build for a AA/SR along other combos.
     
  8. GOATROPER02
    Joined: Mar 22, 2006
    Posts: 2,059

    GOATROPER02
    Member
    from OHIO

    Hi
    We do stroker early Olds kits and completes
    Do a search of my user name and see the speed parts we have to offer

    Tony

    Ross Racing Engines
    1763 North Main St
    Niles,Ohio
    44446

    330-544-4466
     
  9. do you guys offer high performance camshafts for the 394's? i tried calling your shop but nobody answered
     
  10. panic
    Joined: Jan 3, 2004
    Posts: 1,450

    panic

    One of the most famous cars using stroked 394 (alias GMC V8) was Hugh Tucker's "Ventura Motors" 1928 Chevy AA/SR with blown 476".

    [​IMG]
     
  11. GOATROPER02
    Joined: Mar 22, 2006
    Posts: 2,059

    GOATROPER02
    Member
    from OHIO

    Hi
    Yes we have cams [sorry probly was in back of shop] m-f 9to5

    Thanks,Tony
     
  12. dieselc
    Joined: May 17, 2004
    Posts: 1,315

    dieselc
    Member
    from ohio

    Ok old post but I want to bring it back up again. I was on you tube and saw a video of a guy in sweden with a g***er 55 buick with a blown 394, I messaged him to find out more about it. I said he put a 425 crank in the 394 block, I asked what machine work he had done. He said none he used the 425 bearings, and used 455 rods and pistons. That took him to about 8.5:1 compression. So I got to looking and the deck height on a 394 is 10.631 and the deck height on the 425 and 455 are 10.625 so I added up the 455 crank and rods and pistons comes out to 10.610. So has any one here tried the combo in a 394 yet?
     
  13. My only Olds experience is with the DRCE only, but simple engine math and your formula comes up to pistons only .021" in the hole. A nice skim cut of .015" on the block deck to square and true, you pistons are now only .006" down. I would only deck .010"- .012", since you are using stock production rods and crankshaft, as this will allow for any varience in center to center length dimension, throws of the crank slightly off, and still keep the pistons below deck zero. BDM
     
    Last edited: Dec 3, 2010
  14. dieselc
    Joined: May 17, 2004
    Posts: 1,315

    dieselc
    Member
    from ohio

    Just what I was thinking bulldogmafia. I think it would work but wondered if anyone has tried it yet.
     
  15. GOATROPER02
    Joined: Mar 22, 2006
    Posts: 2,059

    GOATROPER02
    Member
    from OHIO

    few things here,

    394 uses rear thrust bearing
    425 uses a center thrust
    425 is a 2 year only crank and not at all common

    Block would need machined in rear and I seem to remember center main web is to narrow for 425 bearing
    and crank doesnt have any material to create a rear thrust

    Also its been quite some time since I checked all this and was trying to do it ,but I believe there was something different in the main bearing spacing and length of the shaft as well as timing gear alignment

    Ive done lots crafting in my time and anything can be done,but how nice is the end result?

    I can get you to around 440 ci with one of my strokers with a lot less h***le using more duable parts and not maxing the bores out

    Just my thoughts,
    Tony
     
  16. OldsRanch
    Joined: Feb 18, 2004
    Posts: 185

    OldsRanch
    Member

    No, you can't. Theres the fact that you cant take the mains down that far and end up with anything, same with the rod throws.

    You can, however, take a 425 (3.970 stroke) crank and cut its counterweights down enough to put in a 350 diesel block, and take the block up to 4.250 bore. Taking the rod journals down to BBC and evening up the stroke at 4.000....I have one under construction at the moment, and it comes up to a 454" olds. Smitty @ M&J in Louisville, Ohio is doing the short block.
     
  17. joe_padavano
    Joined: Jan 18, 2010
    Posts: 263

    joe_padavano
    Member

    Actually, the 65-67 400 and 425 Olds motors all used the same crank. It is forged and not really that hard to find even today.
     
  18. 53sled
    Joined: Jul 5, 2005
    Posts: 5,817

    53sled
    Member
    from KCMO

    You CAN offset grind a 455 and use buick rods, and you're there.
    http://www.442.com/tech/phr493.html
     
  19. GOATROPER02
    Joined: Mar 22, 2006
    Posts: 2,059

    GOATROPER02
    Member
    from OHIO

    Guys above here^^^^^
    We are talking about earlier generation 394 Olds here
    Whole different animal what we call a late model Olds ....1965-80something

    Tony
     
  20. dieselc
    Joined: May 17, 2004
    Posts: 1,315

    dieselc
    Member
    from ohio

    Thank you Tony, I brought it back up to see what or if anyone body else tried anything new or what I was talking about. I wish the guy I found on youtube was a hamber. He is adamit that the set up I explained is what he is running with no extra machine work to the crank.
     
  21. GOATROPER02
    Joined: Mar 22, 2006
    Posts: 2,059

    GOATROPER02
    Member
    from OHIO

    I think your talking about Thom in sweden
    Hes a customer of mine and a good guy

    I didnt sell him a crank so I cant verify what he did
    But I have had all the pieces in front of me and I know for sure its not a bolt together without work

    I also know he has had issuses with that engine ,and is building a new one with all the parts he bought from me

    Tony
     
  22. 1934coupe
    Joined: Feb 22, 2007
    Posts: 5,265

    1934coupe
    Member

    I've got a 394 Olds motor and a 425 motor both of which I'm building for projects. I heard the cranks were interchangible so I tried the 425 crank in the 394 block and it does not fit the rear main area is definitly different.

    Pat
     

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.