Register now to get rid of these ads!

Truck project not too Low.

Discussion in 'The Hokey Ass Message Board' started by straykatkustoms, May 17, 2004.

  1. straykatkustoms
    Joined: Oct 30, 2001
    Posts: 28,464

    straykatkustoms
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    Some of you guys may know Kustom Kemps of America's Bill Moore.
    Check out his new project, do you think it might be too Low?
    Bill is defintely old school, his truck is not bagged it drives this way. Enjoy the pics..

    Happy Trails,

    Mick
     

    Attached Files:

  2. J Man
    Joined: Dec 11, 2003
    Posts: 4,131

    J Man
    Member
    from Angola, IN

    Thats pretty low in the front for not being bagged. I like it.
     
  3. straykatkustoms
    Joined: Oct 30, 2001
    Posts: 28,464

    straykatkustoms
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    To give you an idea how low the truck is, Bill is not 6'5" he is about 5'7"
    The truck doesn't drag the frame until he has a p***enger.
    I told him don't commit a sin and raise it just drive solo......

    Happy Trails,

    Mick
     

    Attached Files:

  4. Then he hits a pot hole or speed bump..

    POW, there goes the front end...not to mention, crossmember, oil pan etc...
     
  5. fordiac
    Joined: Nov 27, 2001
    Posts: 424

    fordiac
    Member
    from Medina, Oh

    yeah, looks good, so how did he lower it then?
     
  6. Flipper
    Joined: May 10, 2003
    Posts: 3,481

    Flipper
    Member
    from Kentucky

    considering how high the motor is in the second pic....my guess is that it has been channeled. .....or if you read the truck mags...body dropped.
     
  7. Church
    Joined: Nov 15, 2002
    Posts: 2,844

    Church
    Member
    from South Bay

    What is too low? It doesn't compute.
     
  8. kustomd
    Joined: Mar 2, 2001
    Posts: 1,222

    kustomd
    Member

    Hey it looks alwright I just got done lowering my 66 chevy pickup this weekend and last weekend I ground some wide whites for it. I'll try and get a picture up of it.
     
  9. thirtytwo
    Joined: Dec 19, 2003
    Posts: 2,652

    thirtytwo
    Member

    yah... the ground is to high.....
     
  10. tred
    Joined: Mar 20, 2003
    Posts: 2,385

    tred
    Member

    ahh, it's fine. my buddy did exactly the same thing with his '77 suburban. didn't drag unless we were both in it, but hey, those a-arms were way too thick anyhow [​IMG]





    no such thing as too low.
    tred.
     
  11. tucker
    Joined: Jan 9, 2003
    Posts: 122

    tucker
    Member

    It's too low. I'd be afraid to get it over 30 mph, but maybe your roads are better than ours. Around here it would be undriveable. I guess it would be ok for a fairgrounds only cruiser.
     
  12. kustomd
    Joined: Mar 2, 2001
    Posts: 1,222

    kustomd
    Member

    How did he lower it I just relized that had twin I beam front suspension. Droped Ibeams or did he subframe it? Just curious one of my friends has one of those trucks and he wants to lower it but the Ibeams are really expensive.
     
  13. straykatkustoms
    Joined: Oct 30, 2001
    Posts: 28,464

    straykatkustoms
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    Hey guys,

    I don't know how he lowered the truck. I'm supposed to talk
    to him tomorrow and I'll let ya know the details.

    Happy Trails,

    Mick
     
  14. james
    Joined: May 18, 2001
    Posts: 1,064

    james
    Member

    Let me guess-- z'd frame in the front AND a channel?
     
  15. Rocky had a shortbox Ford that sat like that. Hell EVERYTHING ROCKY owned sits like that!
     
  16. ramrod
    Joined: Jul 7, 2003
    Posts: 114

    ramrod
    Member
    from NJ

    The front is about 2 inches too low,and the back is 2 inches too high.
     
  17. IntrstlarOvrdrve
    Joined: Feb 26, 2004
    Posts: 364

    IntrstlarOvrdrve
    Member

    You can never go too low [​IMG] Although that would be a pain to drive...
     
  18. 41ChevyTrucker
    Joined: Nov 4, 2003
    Posts: 453

    41ChevyTrucker
    Member

    I like it. Although I would like it on "bags" better. Bags are "old school" Firestone debuted them back in 1933. [​IMG]
     
  19. burndup
    Joined: Mar 11, 2002
    Posts: 1,938

    burndup
    Member
    from Norco, CA

    bags are for hippys...
     
  20. deadelvis
    Joined: Aug 28, 2003
    Posts: 116

    deadelvis
    Member

  21. Farmer
    Joined: Sep 20, 2002
    Posts: 2,091

    Farmer
    Member

    you could drive over it with a tank and get it even lower, no? to each his own.......
     
  22. robber grin
    Joined: May 26, 2003
    Posts: 464

    robber grin
    Member

    I'd really like to see a pic of your 66...

    sounds nice.

    LOOKS NICE TOO...
    just found your other post. Cool truck.
    Your boss is our of his tree. Looks good to me.
     
  23. dj Melon
    Joined: Apr 23, 2004
    Posts: 41

    dj Melon
    Member

    Mick,
    I knew there was something strange about Bill the first time I met him!,,,,can't say too much about being TOO low,,,he just needs to get a couple more lowering blocks in the rear springs....that would be low.

    HT,
    Melon
     
  24. Satinblack
    Joined: Jan 1, 2004
    Posts: 970

    Satinblack
    Member

    It can never be to low! Heres mine, no bags and no problems [​IMG]. Satin
     

    Attached Files:

  25. lowburban
    Joined: Jan 9, 2003
    Posts: 445

    lowburban
    Member

    I like the delivery Satinblack. I got a 51 delivery waiting for it's turn to be loved. what suspension is underneath? Here's some pics of my DAily driver. I not ot's not traditional but My new project and soon to be daily is a 63 chevy longbed that sits the same. Be ready this summer. [​IMG] [​IMG]
     
  26. Satinblack
    Joined: Jan 1, 2004
    Posts: 970

    Satinblack
    Member

    I have a mustII up front with mono leafs in the rear with early camaro rear. Sweet ride, I like the suicides. Satin
     
  27. lowburban
    Joined: Jan 9, 2003
    Posts: 445

    lowburban
    Member

    I think I'm gonna put mine on a s10 ch***is like So-What does. Bigger rear end though cause of the weight and I'll probably put a mild motor in it. Thinkin of sectioning the roof above the drip rails but yours and another I've seen look fine w/out it so I don't know. Wife go's back to work in a year and I can buy something new so I'm tryin to talk her into getting the loan to let me ground-up build the panel instead. Wish me luck.
     
  28. Ding, ding, ding!!!

    He WINS the prize for the "lowest red '72 Ford F-100 Longbed with fake snap on spun aluminum wheel disks and thin whitewalls"!!!

    Sam.
     
  29. Mmmm... Love it!

    I'd say... Get rid of the chrome trim and call it done!!

    [​IMG] [​IMG] [​IMG]
     
  30. G V Gordon
    Joined: Oct 29, 2002
    Posts: 5,724

    G V Gordon
    Member
    from Enid OK

    Dammit Mick, now you've got me eyeing my '78 F150 again. Stop it!, or I will never get anything done. [​IMG]
    George
     

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.