Register now to get rid of these ads!

Another reason to support SEMA

Discussion in 'The Hokey Ass Message Board' started by Lobucrod, Jan 3, 2008.

  1. Lobucrod
    Joined: Mar 22, 2006
    Posts: 4,121

    Lobucrod
    Alliance Vendor
    from Texas

    SEMA eNews, Vol. 11, No. 1 - Jan 03, 2008
    EPA INCLUDES SEMA RECOMMENDATIONS IN NEW AUTOBODY PAINTING RULE
    New Regulation Protects Hobbyists and Environment

    The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has issued a rule to regulate paint stripping operations that use methylene chloride and surface coating, and auto body refinishing operations that use paints containing hazardous metal compounds. The rule targets hazardous air pollutants (HAP) which the agency believes may cause cancer or other health disorders. The rule applies to most coating activities that emit HAP but, notably, the EPA followed SEMA’s recommendation and exempted low-volume operations such as when hobbyists restore or customize one or two cars. The EPA incorporated a number of other SEMA suggestions to make the rule as friendly as possible for companies that have spray-coating operations.

    The EPA rule establishes “best practices” (spray booth, spray gun cleaning, etc.) for minimizing HAP emissions during surface coating operations. All shops are effectively required to have a filtered spray booth or prep station and use high-volume low-pressure (HVLP) or equivalent spray equipment. Spray guns are required to be cleaned manually or with an enclosed spray gun washer. The EPA believes many shops have already implemented these best practices.

    According to the EPA, those facilities that have not yet done so could recover the cost of new equipment through a more efficient use of labor and materials. The EPA notes that the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) already requires spray finishing operations to be performed in a booth or similar enclosure (although the new EPA rule could necessitate the use of more efficient filters than currently used).

    Owners and operators are required to provide training for their painters on how to properly spray surface coatings and clean equipment. The EPA has established minimum criteria required for in-house training, similar to existing programs offered by I-CAR (The Inter-Industry Conference on Auto Collision Repair ), STAR (the Spray Technique ****ysis and Research program), or other certification organizations. Painters would be required to complete refresher training and be re-certified every five years.

    Existing operations have up to three years to purchase equipment and complete the initial training of employees. As recommended by SEMA, the EPA will rely on self-certification for training programs. Nevertheless, companies subject to the rule must send the EPA a one-time notification form stating that they are in compliance with the rule or will be within the allotted three years. Companies will have two years to submit the notification form which will contain contact information and a brief description of the operation: number of spray booths, average number of employed painters, etc. (SEMA will publish a sample notification form and EPA contact information when it becomes available). Companies will be required to maintain in-house records verifying painter training/certification, filter replacement, a plan to control paint stripping chemicals, etc.

    SEMA worked closely with a number of member companies, other trade ***ociations and the EPA to craft a rule that should have minimal impact on the hobbyist community. As a result, the regulation does not apply to paint stripping and surface coating performed by individuals as part of a hobby, or for maintenance of their personal vehicles so long as those activities do not exceed two motor vehicles (or the equivalent in pieces) per year.

    Additionally, the rule does not apply to painting done with an airbrush or hand-held, non-refillable aerosol cans. As noted above, paint training is self-certified. The EPA did not pursue an earlier proposal that would have required individuals to produce a training certificate in order to buy paints and coatings. The rule is expected to take effect in January 2008, but as noted most businesses will have up to three years to comply with its various provisions.
     
  2. Unkl Ian
    Joined: Mar 29, 2001
    Posts: 13,509

    Unkl Ian



    So I can certify that I have trained my self ? :confused:
     
  3. Carguy365-24-7
    Joined: Mar 25, 2006
    Posts: 909

    Carguy365-24-7
    Member

    Now this I can live with!!!
     
  4. arkiehotrods
    Joined: Mar 9, 2006
    Posts: 6,802

    arkiehotrods
    Member

    The hobbyist exclusion was part of the original language last summer. The NADA and the ASA (Automotive Service ***ociation) and several Body Shop ***ociations persuaded the EPA to include individuals (hobbyists) as "area" sources of contaminants (as opposed to "major" sources like professional body shops) in the regulations. Their reasoning was, "if we professionals have to have stricter guidelines, so should individuals." Their reasoning also was, "if we can eliminate the backyard hobbyist from doing his own cars, more money for us."

    It's absolutely fantastic that SEMA got the hobbyist exclusion back in. That will make all the difference in the world to guys who just want to enjoy their cars and do their own work.
     
  5. TimDavis
    Joined: Sep 4, 2005
    Posts: 718

    TimDavis
    Member

    I feel like I am beating a dead horse sometimes around here - but I'll say it one more time -

    Click the link in my signature below and Join SAN, it is free! If you really want to support SEMA , then click the links to join SEMA as well. SEMA has done' great things for our hobby, and they do need everyones support.

    If every person who was actively involved in the car hobby would join SEMA, things would be very different.....
     
  6. arkiehotrods
    Joined: Mar 9, 2006
    Posts: 6,802

    arkiehotrods
    Member

    TimDavis is right. Do it now!
     
  7. tjm73
    Joined: Feb 17, 2006
    Posts: 3,677

    tjm73
    Member

    Joined the SAN
     
  8. Carguy365-24-7
    Joined: Mar 25, 2006
    Posts: 909

    Carguy365-24-7
    Member

  9. Jalopy Joker
    Joined: Sep 3, 2006
    Posts: 34,083

    Jalopy Joker
    Member

    Finally did it with link above. Kept saying I need to do it, so I did it. Try it, it won't hurt.
     
  10. 54MEB
    Joined: Nov 21, 2007
    Posts: 107

    54MEB
    Member

  11. TimDavis
    Joined: Sep 4, 2005
    Posts: 718

    TimDavis
    Member

    Good deal guys!
     
  12. INXS
    Joined: Dec 3, 2005
    Posts: 348

    INXS
    Member

    Just added my name to SAN
     
  13. AlbuqF-1
    Joined: Mar 2, 2006
    Posts: 909

    AlbuqF-1
    Member
    from NM

    Joined up

    The bed-wetting do-gooders in Santa Fe just voted to require New Mexico new cars meet Calif. emission standards. Wish there was a group organized to shut that **** down.
     
  14. customcory
    Joined: Apr 25, 2007
    Posts: 1,831

    customcory
    Member

    I was just about ready to e-mail the EPA about this today and voice my opinion about the situation when I read this. I might paint the equvilant of 1 1/2 to 2 cars a year and all my stuff . The only thing I don't have is a gun cleaning tub. I went to school many years ago for doing bodywork, but never got certified. If I have to go back to school to get certified to buy paint dosent seem American to me, but will do it to keep my small business going. I need to join SEMA , been putting it off to long. If you live in North Carolina and talk to the EPA , you contact Kim Teal. E-mail address.. teal.kim@epa.gov telephone number... 919-541-5580. The office is in Research Triangle Park , N.C. It looks like things are better now!:D
     
  15. arkiehotrods
    Joined: Mar 9, 2006
    Posts: 6,802

    arkiehotrods
    Member

    Bringing this back to the top because it has the full article from SEMA's website
     
  16. SlowandLow63
    Joined: Sep 18, 2004
    Posts: 5,958

    SlowandLow63
    Member
    from Central NJ

    Joined, I feel accomplished.

    Believe me I am happy with the hobbyist clause, but does anyone else feel that it is an awfully thick line between a hobbyist and a pro shop. Any bodyshop paints at least 100 cars per year if not more. 2 to 100 seems like an awfully big jump.
     
  17. Hester
    Joined: Jan 15, 2008
    Posts: 82

    Hester
    Member

    Wow, just one more thing that can be illegal about my car.... as someone who removed his cat I face a federal fine if I get caught I think... lots of the old boys around here run straight pipes once they manage to tear their first exhaust off on something...
     
  18. tfeverfred
    Joined: Nov 11, 2006
    Posts: 15,788

    tfeverfred
    Member Emeritus

    Joined SAN. Got start acting instead of watching.
     
  19. TimDavis
    Joined: Sep 4, 2005
    Posts: 718

    TimDavis
    Member

    We have to be united on these issues - Keep joining guys!

    Click the link below \/\/\/
     

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.