Register now to get rid of these ads!

Torque Tubes and the Highway

Discussion in 'The Hokey Ass Message Board' started by Jasper6120, Mar 25, 2008.

  1. Jasper6120
    Joined: Jul 18, 2007
    Posts: 502

    Jasper6120
    Member
    from Australia

    Hey folks
    In my '53 Chevy I got the original torque tube/3spd set up running the original 4.11:1 diff ratio which isn't going to get me anywhere in a hurry. I heard that the 54 has a 3.55:1 diff ratio which would be a lot nicer for the long highway drives. My question is, is there an easy way of swapping the 4.11 diff to the lower revving 3.55 ratio diff?
     
  2. publicenemy1925
    Joined: Feb 4, 2007
    Posts: 3,187

    publicenemy1925
    Member
    from OKC, OK

    That would be a great name for a band.
     
  3. Von Rigg Fink
    Joined: Jun 11, 2007
    Posts: 13,401

    Von Rigg Fink
    Member
    from Garage

    its easy, just a swap.
    but i was told that the 4:11 to 3:55 isnt that big of a savings..
    dont have any experiance with it so i cant say. I just dropped the entire 53 torque tube, and installed an open drive line, cheap, dependable..3.73 rear end..although i have a V8 in mine. but as far as your question the front "pig" unbolts out of the diff. slide a powerglide diff in and yer done. Just sold one to another HAMBer about a month ago ..those were his plans too.
     
  4. Jasper6120
    Joined: Jul 18, 2007
    Posts: 502

    Jasper6120
    Member
    from Australia

    Its actually the ***le of my new book. About a guy who goes places but takes ages to get there. Compelling read :D

    As for the open driveline, thats my over all plan, to swap a mid 70's camaro rear end in the thing. Might just hold out till I got the bean$
     
  5. PeteFromTexas
    Joined: Apr 4, 2007
    Posts: 3,837

    PeteFromTexas
    Member

    If you are going to swap in an open driveline later then I'd just wait till then.

    I have the original 53 transmission and 53 torque tube rear end in mine. A 59 235 pushes her down the road and I don't have any problems. And now that I have a new set of tires I can do 80 all day long with no worries.

    Those old rear ends aren't really all that bad.
     
  6. Jasper6120
    Joined: Jul 18, 2007
    Posts: 502

    Jasper6120
    Member
    from Australia

    80mph? Thats crazy talk
     
  7. PeteFromTexas
    Joined: Apr 4, 2007
    Posts: 3,837

    PeteFromTexas
    Member

    It was pushing it.:D:D:D But I did it for 45 minutes and she held up. I wouldn't do it all the time. I think I could but you are right it's a little crazy. But sometimes you have to push um hard!!:cool:

    I didn't believe it either but my wife was behine me in her 2006 car and was keeping an eye on our speed cause I don't have a speed-o. If she said so I guess it's true... We all know how that works:eek:
     
  8. Jasper6120
    Joined: Jul 18, 2007
    Posts: 502

    Jasper6120
    Member
    from Australia

    I ain't so worried about something going bang now :cool:
     
  9. happy hoppy
    Joined: Apr 23, 2001
    Posts: 2,327

    happy hoppy
    Member


    not really, like mynameisnotpete said I would not run it at 80 all day but I have done 75mph for more then 2 hours on a drive to a show more then a few times.
    tall tires in the rear help with your final ratio.

    the swap to a rear out of a "power glide" car will help, nice tall gears and its a bolt in deal.
     
  10. PeteFromTexas
    Joined: Apr 4, 2007
    Posts: 3,837

    PeteFromTexas
    Member

    Hahaha. I might just have a good rear. Not all of them are very good. Believe me. I'm worried evertime I get in the car. But I just see it as one more thing to have fun fixing!

    For your original question... Highway driving can be tough sometimes. The hight RPMs get pretty old pretty quick.
     
  11. nexxussian
    Joined: Mar 14, 2007
    Posts: 3,237

    nexxussian
    Member

    FWIW 4.11 to 3.55 is almost 14% slower RPM for a given speed, all other things being equal.
     
  12. Von Rigg Fink
    Joined: Jun 11, 2007
    Posts: 13,401

    Von Rigg Fink
    Member
    from Garage

    14% is 14%..but not really that much on the RPM meter..or speedo..like what 8 miles per hour..
     
  13. Jasper6120
    Joined: Jul 18, 2007
    Posts: 502

    Jasper6120
    Member
    from Australia

    14% is better than nothin, plus its another thing to do to keep us punk kids off the streets, if I find one at the wreckers tomorrow in she goes :D
     
  14. Von Rigg Fink
    Joined: Jun 11, 2007
    Posts: 13,401

    Von Rigg Fink
    Member
    from Garage

    think it saves you 280 RPM..is that right?
     
  15. Jasper6120
    Joined: Jul 18, 2007
    Posts: 502

    Jasper6120
    Member
    from Australia

    I guess it varies depending on how fast you're going. If its 14% slower revving that would mean what is normally 3000 rpm would then be 2580 to get you going at the same speed.
     
  16. Von Rigg Fink
    Joined: Jun 11, 2007
    Posts: 13,401

    Von Rigg Fink
    Member
    from Garage

    ok makes sense..i used 2000 rpm to come up with my 280 rpm drop
     
  17. customcory
    Joined: Apr 25, 2007
    Posts: 1,831

    customcory
    Member

    Use to drive to work everyday,20 miles a day, in my 51 Chevy. Had a 3 spd. closed driveline,wore out 54 235 with a 848 head, powerglide 3.55 rear end and I could run 65-70 mph without problems. I couldnt tear it up but finally the steering box wore out!:D
     
  18. DE SOTO
    Joined: Jan 20, 2006
    Posts: 3,857

    DE SOTO
    Member


    Not to make waves.. But if 3.55s arent a big difference.... Why suggest 3.73 ?

    I had a '51 Chevy coupe with a 216 & stock drive train running H~78x15 Bias Tires & drove fron Ventura to San Leandro Ca. & back, approx 370 miles and went along at about 70 (cept for the grades).

    The look at people in new cars as we rode by is Priceless !

    Did the same thing as a kid with my parents in a bone stock '49 4dr on the way to & from Arizona & California

    To many people underestimate thes old cars, To quick to chop them up for newer stuff just for the sake of "NEWER PARTS"

    True some cars need it but not always :cool:
     
  19. Von Rigg Fink
    Joined: Jun 11, 2007
    Posts: 13,401

    Von Rigg Fink
    Member
    from Garage

    what DE SOTO said is true..but you cant trust a torque tube rear end behind a 300+H.P. small block and a lead foot.
    cutting up stuff and adding newer and better parts is great!
    look at some of the cars on here that have...well just that!..new parts in an old car..works for me.
     
  20. 53sled
    Joined: Jul 5, 2005
    Posts: 5,817

    53sled
    Member
    from KCMO

    I love my 5 speed. :)
     
  21. DE SOTO
    Joined: Jan 20, 2006
    Posts: 3,857

    DE SOTO
    Member


    LOL ... True on the 300HP...

    But if yer runnin a 6 the tube is fine ! Hell the 'Ol girl made it this far !!

    Just so no one jumps my ***, For the record, If i was to switch to a V8.. Its a no brainer to open the drive line & get a strong Rear end.

    I was going off the thought of the guy keeping his 'Ol 6 and trying to gaet a Lil mor OOOMMPPFFF outa the Stovbolt
    But to clear the air so noone Jumps my *** about this.... If i was to run a V8 in such a car... Its a no brainer to open the drive line & get a strong rearend....

    Im just going with the thought the guy is KEEPING his 6 and lookin for a Lil more OOMMFFF out the the 'Ol Stovebolt.
    Im with ya, My Daughters '55 Ford has an 8"... Just i feel its not ALWAYS necessary
     
  22. Tony
    Joined: Dec 3, 2002
    Posts: 7,351

    Tony
    Member

    Dat Dirty rat used to own my 53 year's ago, and i know for a fact he drove the hell out of it... One trip to Indy from here and back, running with a bunch of street rodder's with upgraded cars etc.....He kept right up.. He did have an issue with a u-joint when he got back into town from what i remember, but that's it..
    That was a stock 235 3 speed with stock 4:11 diff..
    When i got the car it had p***ed through a couple people since him, and the motor was said to be rebuilt (babbit pounder for the 53 stick cars) and it dosn't sound as good as it did when he owned it (it's pretty noisy and it aint lifter's) so i've become very apprehensive about long trip's with it because of that.
    I've run it for about 1.5 hours or so at 55-60 without a hickup though..
    I think if you have a solid motor and your not prolonging the high rpm's it would probably be fine.....
    Although, i do plan on swapping to a 5 speed and open rear in mine...
    Just for my own piece of mind. It's probably not needed in the big picture.

    Tony
     
  23. Jasper6120
    Joined: Jul 18, 2007
    Posts: 502

    Jasper6120
    Member
    from Australia

    Sounds good, I dig the ol stuff.
    I guess that means I can save my money for those 22 inch chromies always wanted... :eek: ;)
     
  24. Road Runner
    Joined: Feb 7, 2007
    Posts: 1,256

    Road Runner
    Member

    The 54 PG torque tube and gears is a real easy swap for 40s and early 50s cars, preserving the original ******, rear housing, axles and brakes.

    Did it last fall on my 48 coupe driver.
    Found a low-milage rear at a local wrecker for just $150.
    Already got the funds back in gas savings alone...

    My truck has 3.55 gears for about a decade now.
    Drops rpm down about 425 rpm at the same speed.
    You can go on freeways around 2700 rpm and 65 mph all day.
    Gives about 18-20 mpg with dual intake/exhaust.
     
  25. nexxussian
    Joined: Mar 14, 2007
    Posts: 3,237

    nexxussian
    Member

    Tony, I thought the '53 splash oil engines had inserts:confused:?
     
  26. 21stud
    Joined: Sep 3, 2006
    Posts: 336

    21stud
    Member
    from California

    I can tell you from experience that I swapped out my 4:11 rear for a 3:54 in my 34 coupe ,and it was the SINGLE best thing I did for my car. I changed the rear out prior to Paso last yr. What a change. It's better EVERYWHERE except for dragging. Longer shifts between 1st and 2nd. Alot of work for no one to see, but well worth it if you drive alot out of town.
     
  27. It's worth the effort if you plan to keep the car and want to run the stock driveline, as noted. If you have to spend a bunch of money to get the parts you may as well price out the open drive conversion and see which way is best in the long run.
     
  28. newstranger
    Joined: Aug 2, 2005
    Posts: 587

    newstranger
    Member

    They also sell the ring and pinion set that will get you down to that 3:55 you want. I think it's around $300 or so and they say it's pretty easy to install... this might be the route I take with my '52, unless a '54 parts car pops up on the radar.

    -ns
     
  29. Tony
    Joined: Dec 3, 2002
    Posts: 7,351

    Tony
    Member

    To the best of my knowledge , the glide car's had insert bearings to where the stick car's were still babbit..all 54's were insert.
    Even the oil pressure gauge is different. Mine is a low press gauge.
    I could be off with this, but i do know they had different oiling system's depending on what transmission was backing it..
     

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.