Register now to get rid of these ads!

Are any of you considering building an "efficent" hot-rod?

Discussion in 'The Hokey Ass Message Board' started by decker, May 9, 2008.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. gnichols
    Joined: Mar 6, 2008
    Posts: 11,402

    gnichols
    Member
    from Tampa, FL

    Met a guy at the Goodguys show in Nashville that had a turbo Chevette diesel in a flat black 32 Vicky high boy. He said it got 40+ on the highway. WAY TO GO. Gary
     
  2. gnichols
    Joined: Mar 6, 2008
    Posts: 11,402

    gnichols
    Member
    from Tampa, FL

    Indeed. But I'd like a roof, please. Gary
     
  3. gnichols
    Joined: Mar 6, 2008
    Posts: 11,402

    gnichols
    Member
    from Tampa, FL

    VERY NICE I NEED TO KNOW MORE PLEASE! Gary
     
  4. gnichols
    Joined: Mar 6, 2008
    Posts: 11,402

    gnichols
    Member
    from Tampa, FL

    Ok,
    I'm new to this HAMB thing... here goes.
    VERY intriqued by high mileage rods mentioned in this thread. My all-steel 37 Ford 4-door with a 5.0, 500 cfm Edel, C-4 and 3.08 rear only gets 20 mpg on the interstate. It isn't that fast, but looks good and is fun. If you think 20 mpg is good, what are you smoking? I'm sure that with a newer SB, 4-6 speed tranny the mpg would be much higher, but STILL NOT ENOUGH. Change is inevitable, resistance is optional. I put 21K miles on my 37 since late '04 now and would drive it a lot more if I could.
    I'd very much like to build my next rod (a planned low-boy 31-34 Ford pickup to get AT LEAST 35 mpg city and 45 highway (add another 20 percent if a diesel?). It will not be a show car. In fact, hope to make it a daily driver and "show the flag" all day, every day. So, I'm thinking economy, in-the weeds, great handling and hot rod looks. Think Lotus 7 weight and "pep" with a cab and bed.
    Motor wise, I think the VW turbo diesel (heck, I'm building a TRUCK ain't I, so what is wrong with a diesel?) is the best bet. Perhaps Banks will eventually make some peppy stuff for it? There is already a firm that makes the kit to put this motor in a Samurai and make it a rock crawler, so how hard could that be in an old Ford frame? How about the small Benz-designed turbo diesel from the Jeep Liberty? One of the newer Benz or BMW diesels? Or any number of small Ford Focus or GM I-4's?
    Some years ago a fellow had a really cool, black track T in Street Rodder. The motor looked like a little Offy, but NOTHING was said about it in the write-up. When I queried the mag via email, they confirmed my suspicions, it was in fact a little DOHC Alfa Romeo! But I guess they were just too embarrassed to say so about the hot rod. That is a very nice little mill, too, and it's all aluminum so you can polish it to your heart's content. Also comes with a VERY slick 5-speed and is all inline drive already. Any number of healthy, powerful Nippon I-4 car and truck engines? The 2L I-4 from the Honda S-2000 sports car makes 240hp/torque in the 250 range. But, sadly, it is tuned for premuim.
    Of course, you can build up any of these small motors to get a lot of performance (anyone race a Lotus 7 clone lately... they are SO fast but only weigh about 1400lbs) but that would defeat the whole purpose of an econo-rod, eh?
    By the time I get my "eco-rod" done, who knows what gas will be priced at... so I'm thinking light, small and torquey - with pin stripes. If it can haul some cargo, handle well and look good, too... I'm thinking 200 hp and as much as 250 torque would be perfectly affordable. While I'd prefer an I-4, there are plenty of nice little V-6s to choose from, too.
    Later, Gary
     
  5. 48ford
    Joined: Dec 15, 2001
    Posts: 465

    48ford
    Member

    I don't think you need to run a 4 banger to get efficent.
    Irene everyday driver is a 96 towncar with a 4.6,I do nothing to this car but put gas in it.
    It gets 26mpg. this is no joke and its a heavy car,think if you put this combo in a lighter car.
    And it's not bad,kind of quick.don't take myword for it,go drive one.
    These old boats are cheap too.
    Russ
     
  6. gnichols
    Joined: Mar 6, 2008
    Posts: 11,402

    gnichols
    Member
    from Tampa, FL

    Russ, TOO wide for my planned pickup. Thanx, Gary
     
  7. repoguy
    Joined: Jul 27, 2002
    Posts: 2,085

    repoguy
    Member


    I agree.
     
  8. Aman
    Joined: Dec 28, 2005
    Posts: 2,522

    Aman
    Member
    from Texas

    Just installed a 2x4 set-up on my 350 in the A. I always wanted one so I ponied up the bucks and put it on. Maybe the 700r and 2.73 rearend will help. I don't plan on winning any mpg contest right now but if I do I'll change it back to the Holley Q-jet or possibily 600. I agree that hot rods and fuel econony shouldn't be used in the same sentence but, if things continue on there present track I may change my mind. The creative folks on here will be a few bucks ahead of me but at least I can learn from them.
     
  9. The_Monster
    Joined: Sep 8, 2003
    Posts: 1,805

    The_Monster
    Member

    How many of you seriously use your hotrod as your daily driver? I know there are some, but not most.

    Your hotrod is your toy, and driven for fun. So who cares how many miles per gallon you get? Its a hotrod!

    Ive got a inline 6 in my daily driver (65 wagon). But my hotrod? 440 six pack baby! Im never bowing to the gas pump. I want big noise and plenty of power with my hotrod.

    The day I have to compromise that, is the day I wont run a hotrod, ill run a custom with an inline.
     
  10. gnichols
    Joined: Mar 6, 2008
    Posts: 11,402

    gnichols
    Member
    from Tampa, FL

    I've had a few motorcycle toys, too. All daily drivers. Go anywhere, park anywhere, looked cool, got good mileage and they were plenty sporty. The only down side was the lack of a roof (sorry all you FTF and FTR guys) and luggage space. But my street rod isn't... insurance and mpg are the two primary reasons. While my 4-door 37 has a lot to offer, it just isn't stingy enough. It has never been to the strip and I don't street race but it turns plenty of heads and it can keep up with the pack all day long. In fact, it runs real purdy at about 90 and will do it all day long, rain or shine. My appologies to all if you think I'm a wimp because I can't afford to put fuel in it at those speeds.

    Besides... cruzing a burger joint or the fairgrounds doesn't take much motor - the loping blower is all for show, eh? You can profile / cruise / vogue around in anything. If you wanna go FAST, then get a race car. No matter how much you hop up your muscle car or hot rod, it probably wont be as fast as a real race car. Better to start with an old race car and work the problem backwards if you really want fast.

    Gary
     
  11. Roothawg
    Joined: Mar 14, 2001
    Posts: 25,726

    Roothawg
    Member

  12. brewsir
    Joined: Mar 4, 2001
    Posts: 3,278

    brewsir
    Member

    so if they heated the gas lines so the carb was spraying vapor how did they keep the lines from vaporlocking?? Or maybe since it was all vapor it doesn't get stopped????
     
  13. 1950ChevySuburban
    Joined: Dec 20, 2006
    Posts: 6,185

    1950ChevySuburban
    Member Emeritus
    from Tucson AZ

    I'm going with the late model Ranger 2.3 DOHC in my '29 Sedan. And probably turbo'd. It'll look as much like a traditional Offy as I can get.
     
  14. turbostude
    Joined: Nov 8, 2006
    Posts: 343

    turbostude
    Member
    from minnesota

    I'm building a "37' Stude boat-tailed speedster" three wheeler (2F1R) powered by a turbocharged flathead 6 Stude motor, running on LP. Engine dyno'd at 233 hp, 290 ft-lbs torque on gas. Expect LP will give a little less, but support the octane requirements of 15+ pounds boost and give 25% the hydrocarbon emissions. Three wheels means lower rolling resistance. Low frontal profile will help. Total weight expected to be around 2000 lbs. All parts are recycled Stude, scrap steel. Parts of body are to be made from that material created from plastic milk cartons.
    Hoping for 50 mpg with the Stude 3 speed overdrive tranny. Can run fairly low numerical final drive with light weight and huge torque. Low CG means 1.5 G corners. At the salt, this engine went 137 in a 3250 pound car.
    See Tribaker website.....
     
  15. lostforawhile
    Joined: Mar 23, 2008
    Posts: 4,159

    lostforawhile
    Member

    well i think what some people are saying is they would like to be able to drive them more.has anyone thought about the old benz diesels from the seventies . they had some tough old motors and interesting too. i'm trying to remember if it came in a four. they were all mechanical too,no elctronics for the fuel injection system. but they had some torque now. antique german engine in a rod might be pretty cool. look at some of tom daniels creations he has made. make you an old natzi helmet into an air cleaner lol. plus there is something cool about an old engine that sounds like it's eating marbles. nothing wrong with an old four. even the 40 would be cool with a nice built flathead in it. i think sometimes that people get so hung up on v8's that they forget there were a lot of really interesting engines around. what did people do before the v8 was invented? dammit now i'm going to have to search out one of those benz engines that is still running good. :D
     
  16. lostforawhile
    Joined: Mar 23, 2008
    Posts: 4,159

    lostforawhile
    Member

    heres one running in the back of someones truck,it's an eighties one, but it's identical to the ones from the seventies. def have some ideas now. you have to admit they have character. and i'm sure you could get a manual tranny,since a lot of them went in delivery trucks also.
    at least it would be something totally different not the same as you see over and over. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m00MBqnxacY
     
  17. ????? how's a turbo going to help gas mileage......Im also thinkin about a v-6 or the like in a model A and sellin my 39 poncho....since its 48 miles round trip to my office and yeah I ride my Harley about 70% of the time then again maybe just a good tune-up and tryin to get that eldebrock carb right and common sence I can keep things the way they are.........:rolleyes:
     
  18. Two more words: Ug Buttly
     
  19. Tall Tom
    Joined: Aug 19, 2005
    Posts: 381

    Tall Tom
    Member
    from Austin MN

    Attached Files:

  20. nexxussian
    Joined: Mar 14, 2007
    Posts: 3,237

    nexxussian
    Member


    It would let you use a smaller lighter engine and still get a certain amount of performance (talking overall economy here, not specific fuel consumption). Works best in a small light car (go figgure:rolleyes:).
     

  21. That's cool... but do you have to make the "hot rod sound" yourself with a bullhorn? :D
     
  22. I have a really nice blender... but only it makes great margarita's :D

    "Hot-rods" be they 4-6-8-10-12 cylinders... need that jus' right sound don't they? If I'm gunna drive a car with no radio and an open roof... I at least want to enjoy the music of an engine no matter how many slugs are pumping up and down. An electric hot-rod sound must be like something from Judge Dredd :rolleyes:
     
  23. birkin08
    Joined: May 10, 2008
    Posts: 34

    birkin08
    Member
    from California

    very cool! I recently picked up a Lotus 7 clone w/ a similar Zetec engine and a T9 trans (typical driveline in modern 7's) and am very happy with it, 175 hp as is and many people get them up to 225 hp w/ cams. Just put a Hushpower muffler on it, sounds great (NOT like a ricer at all) and power feels as good as with the stock raspy glass pack....and 175 hp is pretty intense in a 1300 lb car Also, FWIW many 7's are being built w/ small GM V6's and go on to win at road races and autox's...this car is not a traditional hotrod but is worth looking at to see and hear this driveline in use http://www.bruntonauto.com/
     

    Attached Files:

    • z.jpg
      z.jpg
      File size:
      80.1 KB
      Views:
      126
  24. birkin08,

    How do you like the T9 tranny? I've heard both good and bad- just wanted your $.02.
     
  25. birkin08
    Joined: May 10, 2008
    Posts: 34

    birkin08
    Member
    from California

    works great so far (only 2 mos.), shifter has a good feel, and mine has an alternate 1st gear as the stock gear is useless in such a light car. Since they are so common in 7's there are lots of parts available, especially from the UK
     
  26. nexxussian
    Joined: Mar 14, 2007
    Posts: 3,237

    nexxussian
    Member

    Birkin08, first I've heard of the T9. I searched Google (and here) and didn't come up with anything. What is it's claim to fame?
     
  27. What gears are you using? I'm putting together a T speedster and have thought about the T9, since I'll be using a Quad4 and will have a lightweight body. The T9 looks like it will give me a little more footroom than the T5?
     
  28. gnichols
    Joined: Mar 6, 2008
    Posts: 11,402

    gnichols
    Member
    from Tampa, FL

    Just for fun,
    In my 4-banger research I looked for sites on cars that used motorcycle engines... WOW some crazy folks are putting turbo Hayabusas in Sevens. Probably not enough torque for a 2K lb rod, but it must make a seven sound like a vintage F2 car. Gary
     
  29. ot0_m0t0
    Joined: Sep 18, 2006
    Posts: 64

    ot0_m0t0
    Member

    In Croatia a gallon of 95 is ..... are you ready?.......

    7.28$

    And only now are with the sport, :eek: talk about bad timing.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.