Register now to get rid of these ads!

Totally Confused About Final Gear Ratio, Please Help

Discussion in 'The Hokey Ass Message Board' started by haney, Aug 12, 2008.

  1. haney
    Joined: Jul 14, 2008
    Posts: 150

    haney
    Member
    from Knoxville

    Alright so my '51 chevy doesn't do very well on the highway. I get up to about 60 and the engine is just screaming. I've been told that the stock gear in the car was a 4.11:1 and that in order to fix it I needed to put a 3.55:1 rear end out of a PG rear end. I had an extra rear end laying behind my fathers shop so I hauled it in and took the rear cover off. I read the side of the pinion gear and it said 39 11. Then I counted the gear and it had 39 teeth. 39 / 11 = 3.55. So I ***umed that this was the 3.55:1 rear end that I needed and that changing to this rear end would fix my problem and allow me to run interstate speeds. Well for safe measure I took the rear plate off of the current rear end and to my suprise it read 37 12. 37 / 12 = 3.08. I didn't even know that they made closed driveline chevies in gears that high. I'm totally confused, am I figuring rear end ratios wrong? If the gear is that high why am I still having problems going interstate speeds? What am I missing? HELP!?!?!
     
  2. Ring gear tooth divided by pinion tooth count equals gear ratio.
    3.55 ratio with 26" tall tires at 65 mph, 2970 rpms, without any overdrive.
    3.08 with 26" at 65, 2590 engine rpm without overdrive.
    Taller tires would make for less engine rpms at the same vehicle speed. But they would look like ****.
     
  3. blown41
    Joined: Apr 6, 2008
    Posts: 139

    blown41
    Member

    Jack the rear up rotate the driveshaft. Count the revolutions of the driveshaft vs. the wheel.
     
  4. pitman
    Joined: May 14, 2006
    Posts: 5,148

    pitman

    Can't help you w/the digits posted on the rear, but if you have a 3.08 final drive ratio it is an excellent highway cruising gear. Anything up to a 3.55 is fine. The 3.08 is good for mileage, but as you move up toward the 4.00's you will be trading "mileage" for "acceleration".
     
  5. haney
    Joined: Jul 14, 2008
    Posts: 150

    haney
    Member
    from Knoxville

    See that's what I thought too. I'm wondering if there is some inaccuracy in my measurement, or my understanding.
     
  6. blown41
    Joined: Apr 6, 2008
    Posts: 139

    blown41
    Member

  7. squirrel
    Joined: Sep 23, 2004
    Posts: 59,987

    squirrel
    Member

    Did you count the gear teeth on the one in the car?

    and it's a closed driveline rearend?

    huh...
     
  8. Nick79
    Joined: Apr 19, 2006
    Posts: 276

    Nick79
    Member
    from Austin, TX

    Sounds like you are only counting one set of teeth? You need to count both the ring and pinion as was mentioned earlier. Forget about what is written on anything. Count both sets and that will give you the right figure.
     
  9. R Pope
    Joined: Jan 23, 2006
    Posts: 3,309

    R Pope
    Member

    Your 3.08 gears could be aftermarket stuff. Wish I had a set for my '52!
     
  10. Rudebaker
    Joined: Sep 14, 2007
    Posts: 1,598

    Rudebaker
    Member
    from Illinois

    To correctly calculate RPM for a given FDR and MPH you need the "rolling radius" of the rear tires. here is a real handy link for figuring FDR's, MPH, RPM, rolling radius, speedo gears etc.

    http://tri-5.chevyrides.com/speedo.php
     
  11. haney
    Joined: Jul 14, 2008
    Posts: 150

    haney
    Member
    from Knoxville

    Alright, I'm an idiot (see there's a "newbie" under my name). I didn't count the pinion gear, I relied on what was stamped on the ring gear. When I did manage to get a chalk mark on the pinion gear I was able to count it and it had 10 teeth on it. The ratio that is currently in the car is 37 / 10 = 3.70 not 37 / 12 = 3.08 as I had previously thought. The spare rearend that I have is 39 / 11 = 3.55 so I will be switching over to it after all. I didn't think there was a higher gear than 3.55 and luckily I was right. Hopefully when I get the switch made I will be getting better highway speeds. Thank you so much for your help everyone!
     
  12. squirrel
    Joined: Sep 23, 2004
    Posts: 59,987

    squirrel
    Member

    That is what I figured might have happened, thanks for letting us know. You won't see a big change from 3.70 to 3.55 ratio, but it should get you another 5 mph....
     
  13. 1931av8
    Joined: Jun 2, 2008
    Posts: 389

    1931av8
    Member

    Looks like you might have a 1954 only rear ***embly in there now. I believe that was the only year where they had the 3.70 option using the 37-10T configuration. My Master Parts catalog shows a 41-11T (3.72) version, but I have not seen one.
    Most early cars used the 37-9T version which is hell on the highway with the low RPM six. You are lucky to have the PG unit available. You are correct that it uses 39-11T for 3.54 overall. Make sure you have the right brake set-up. The early ones used the Huck brakes. The later ones used the self energizing Bendix style. You want the laters...they make a big difference.

    If this doesn't work to your satisfaction, your next step is to do a T-5 ****** with an open drive-line conversion. Most use a Tri-Five era open driveline to get close on width.

    Tom
     
  14. haney
    Joined: Jul 14, 2008
    Posts: 150

    haney
    Member
    from Knoxville

    still not entirely sure what the original rear end ratio was (3.70, 4.11 whatever I counted teeth so many times and got either 9 or 10 each time since the pinion gears are kinda hard to count) but now that I have the new PG rear with a 3.54 my old chevy will do 90! I never would have dreamed that that old engine would be able to do that. My cousin was following me in is corvette and the speedometer only goes up to 85 on it, he was turning the needle around backwards and my old chevy was pulling away from him. I could not be more pleased with this swap.
     

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.