Register now to get rid of these ads!

weight of old hemi ..

Discussion in 'The Hokey Ass Message Board' started by Topolino Kid, Sep 19, 2008.

  1. what do they weigh??as in compared to a sbc????trying to figure out what to run in my 38 fiat topolino...gonna be my "old guy cruiser"....want something that is able to cruise long durations on the express way...what are the costs of them...the depend-ability of hemi's...and what king of power out of the different ones....i think it would be the coolest motor to install in it...but..:eek:.....don't want to worry about it needing parts very time i drive it 500+ mies ....yeah i know, sbc is dependable ect...have them laying around...drove blown 400 sbc vega wagon every day for over a year..
    and i guess is there any that run out thee that won't break the bank to buy...don't needed to be "fresh rebuild", just good running........opinons.......mark......
     
  2. dana barlow
    Joined: May 30, 2006
    Posts: 5,250

    dana barlow
    Member
    from Miami Fla.
    1. Y-blocks

  3. Last edited: Sep 19, 2008
  4. The link that was listed before my post, shows the 331 Hemi at 745 pounds. Maybe my 1,100 pound answer has the transmission, PS pump-alternator installed? Them Hemi girls always LIE about their true weight. :D
     
  5. George
    Joined: Jan 1, 2005
    Posts: 7,844

    George
    Member

    Hot Heads lists 331/354 @ 697 & 392 @ 737. Says you could lose 35 lbs with modern W/P, Alt,starter, Intake. They are as reliable as any other engine. If you build too wild you'll have problems, like anything else. a buddy of mine has put 100K on a rebuilt 354.
     
  6. and with a sbc everyone is going to walk on by your car when it has the hood up, i dont care how nice the car is, the sbc kills it's soul.

    the sbc is the death of our craft and sport.
     
  7. loudpedal
    Joined: Mar 23, 2004
    Posts: 2,209

    loudpedal
    Member
    from SLC Utah


    What?

    Tell that to 3WLarry who built one of the best examples of a car with a soul. It takes more than just a Hemi to make it happen...
     

    Attached Files:

    Last edited: Sep 19, 2008
  8. loudpedal
    Joined: Mar 23, 2004
    Posts: 2,209

    loudpedal
    Member
    from SLC Utah

    1. Long durations on a stock Hemi? No problem.

    2. Costs of a Hemi are at least double of a SBC.

    3. "depend-ability" is as any other engine.

    4. Power varies just as any other engine. It depends on what's in the guts. A 392 with 354 heads would be a good start.

    5. I never did, why should you?

    6. I'm guessing no.
     
  9. Royalshifter
    Joined: May 29, 2005
    Posts: 15,665

    Royalshifter
    Moderator
    from California

    That is a very bold comment.:confused:
     
  10. Weasel
    Joined: Dec 30, 2007
    Posts: 6,698

    Weasel
    Member

    It would help to understand where you are coming from. Why do you want a Hemi? Is it a 'look at me' thing?:rolleyes: There are other engines that are lighter and more powerful. But if it's a hemi you must have, then ....

    Big Chrysler early hemis are very heavy (695-735lbs - even more with a blower setup) and you will have a seriously front heavy car (=poor handling) - especially with a Topo.

    My 0.2c - Dodge Red Ram - maybe 315/325 raised block version. 241/270s have weak cranks. Much less weight, same type of visuals and can look just as cool. Less horsepower, but with a Hilborn or even a blower setup - yes that's right - rare but do-able. You should have more than enough power for your cruiser. Oh yeah and Bruce Crower ran one (270) at Indy, twin turboed.

    Cheap it will not be, so don't expect SBC costs for a hemi build.
     

    Attached Files:

    Last edited: Sep 19, 2008
  11. Littleman
    Joined: Aug 25, 2004
    Posts: 2,617

    Littleman
    Alliance Member
    from OHIO, USA

    The SBC is one of the best all time HotRod engines of all time !!!!!!...and I own a couple of 392 hemi's...love them too......Littleman...
     
  12. Billybobdad
    Joined: Mar 12, 2008
    Posts: 973

    Billybobdad
    Member

    Gimme a fricken break here:cool:
     
  13. Weasel
    Joined: Dec 30, 2007
    Posts: 6,698

    Weasel
    Member

    Really?
     

    Attached Files:

  14. Von Rigg Fink
    Joined: Jun 11, 2007
    Posts: 13,404

    Von Rigg Fink
    Member
    from Garage

    this isnt even worth responding to..and I dont even know why i went this far:mad:

    what is up with the sbc haters?..why are so many Nubees making such ignorant blanket statements lately?..did some one piss in your cereal this morning..or maybe it was an SBC that showed you its tail lights once too many times?

    sorry I dont mean to get this thread off subject..
    somewhere I saw a list of engine weights..Ill keep hunting for it..
    It might take me a while,,all my cars have SBC's in them:rolleyes:
     
    Last edited: Sep 19, 2008
  15. Von Rigg Fink
    Joined: Jun 11, 2007
    Posts: 13,404

    Von Rigg Fink
    Member
    from Garage

    Last edited: Sep 19, 2008
  16. wow!!!!!!!!!!! i didn't expect some of the responses i got on this one..........:confused:...........did some more homework on it before i came here tonite....definitly seems like a hell of a lot of wieght for my topolino...specially when i was hopeful to be under 2300 lbs when done...my blown vega wagon only goes 2490...with a glass one peice nose....geuss it's just that i saw so many topo's with hemi's when i was lil at the track....was just a thought....hell i'm a good ways from needin a motor anyway....maybe a sbc with over and under cross tunnel rams???...besides i have been saving those M/T valve covers for a topo for several years now...finned with the be ass M/T in the middle...and my name is Mark...M/T......mark's topolino :cool:....liked that cx-96 cross over on my 62 chevie II alum block 427:rolleyes:....

    oh well if you don't know the specifics, then ya gotta ask, right??????????? i do know it WON'T BE A FLAT HEAD FORD.....nothing against them, but it just doesn't seem right to me for the lil mouse...hey it's my car , right!!!.......oh well back to pondering the engine for my topo...........thanks for all the good info on the hemi's...........
     
  17. Weasel
    Joined: Dec 30, 2007
    Posts: 6,698

    Weasel
    Member

    Well this is a Flathead Ford based engine - V8 60 to be precise - would look great in your Topo since it was made by Simca and they sold the Topo under the Simca brand.
     

    Attached Files:

  18. nice lookin motor...doesnt reall resemble a flattie, its got vc's....:eek:...what's it cost to find one of these puppies????????hp numbers//torque????not looking for a drag motor, just need something that can do a min of 300 hp +..........
     
  19. Weasel
    Joined: Dec 30, 2007
    Posts: 6,698

    Weasel
    Member

    Its a Brazilian Simca EmiSul - hemi - rare and almost impossible to get out of Brazil.

    How about a British Daimler hemi 2.5 ltr or 4.5 ltr? Limey Steve on the HAMB has the bigger one in his '32. They weigh under 500lbs all up. I have seen a couple on EvilBay in the past six months. The smaller one is shorter than a Chvey V6 - 23 5/8" from back of block to tip of waterpump. The larger one is about the size of a Dodge 315 hemi - a couple of inches longer than the baby Daimler.
     

    Attached Files:

  20. presride
    Joined: Mar 3, 2008
    Posts: 8

    presride
    Member

    The "Complete Chrysler Hemi" book has a weight comparison chart in it on page 191. The 331 Chrysler Hemi weighs 697 pounds; The Chrysler 392 hemi weighs 737 pounds; the tall block Dodge hemi's (315 ci and 325 ci) weigh 611 pounds; the small block Dodge hemi (241ci and 270 ci) weighs 577 pounds; the Chevy small block weighs 528 pounds; and, the Chevy big block weighs 693 pounds. The allure of the old hemi's is they are almost bullet proof (the one exception being the small Dodge's have gained a reputation, whether deserved or not, for crankshaft failures)and are examples of Detroit's craftsmanship at its best. The tolerances on these engines is extremely close and they are built to run hard and stand up under the punishment.
     
  21. Jarred Hodges
    Joined: Jul 30, 2008
    Posts: 564

    Jarred Hodges
    Member

    697lbs for a 331 sounds about right. We had one with the original cast iron automatic tranny and it was all my engine puller wanted to lift
     

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.