Register now to get rid of these ads!

what exhaust manifolds you got on your 49-52 chevy?

Discussion in 'The Hokey Ass Message Board' started by 49ratfink, Oct 6, 2008.

  1. 49ratfink
    Joined: Feb 8, 2004
    Posts: 25,229

    49ratfink
    Member
    from California

    49-54's have that goofy "center point steering" which really gets in the way of V8 swaps. my old sedan had some rear dump exhaust manifolds I believe they came from a 70 truck (?). they cleared the steering just fine but as I found out later the brake pedal came down and hit them after the pedal got a little mushy over time. I found this out the hard way when I went to slow down to turn into my driveway and drove right past it when the pedal hit the exhaust. I fixed that problem with sanderson headers.

    the one I have now has a MII so there are no problems.

    my buddy is putting together a 51 sedan delivery. he paid a guy to intstall a 283. the shop used some exhaust manifolds from who knows what. I was over having a look and he was saying he's gonna take it to have the exhaust put on soon so I look down and told him to be sure the exhaust guy turns the wheel all the way to be certain the pipes clear the steering components.... well these manifolds aint gonna work at all

    this is not gonna be a keeper so headers are out of the question. what are you guys using?
     
  2. HEATHEN
    Joined: Nov 22, 2005
    Posts: 9,060

    HEATHEN
    Member
    from SIDNEY, NY

    I know that they're not very performance oriented, but if it's a basically stock 283 anyway, hunt up a pair of '55-'56 265 manifolds. The whole reason that the LH manifold exits in the front is that, originally, Chevrolet's schedule was to debut their new V8 in the '53 models, but the Korean war upset their plans.
     
  3. 55 dude
    Joined: Jun 19, 2006
    Posts: 9,357

    55 dude
    Member

    my cousin has a 50' chevy with 350/350 combo,M2 front end and uses sanderson block hugger headers. just make sure you use the short starter (late model) ask the guys on www.chevytalk.com they would know
     
  4. 56sedandelivery
    Joined: Nov 21, 2006
    Posts: 6,694

    56sedandelivery
    Member Emeritus

    The 55-56 265 V-8 exhaust manifolds are the ones to use. End dumps, and somewhat "upswept"; the ports go OVER the spark plugs, not UNDER. Some of the 305 Camaro exhaust manifolds look similar if you can't find the early ones, or don't want to pay premium prices for collector type parts. I have the 68' HOT ROD MAGAZINE where they put a SBC V-8 into a 53' Bel Air hardtop, and also converted it to open driveline with a 57 Chevrolet rear end. And, this swap was done WITHOUT cutting or t******* the firewall braces; they moved the radiator forward by cutting the front valence panel. I've sent copies to a couple of people over on ChevyTalk.org. P.M. for same with name/address. Butch/56sedandelivery.
     
  5. Supposedly what works real slick if you can find it is the manifolds for a 267 or 305 from a 77-81 or so Malibu or Monte Carlo (or maybe Monza). They hug real close.
     
  6. 49ratfink
    Joined: Feb 8, 2004
    Posts: 25,229

    49ratfink
    Member
    from California

    I was thinking about the 265 manifolds... but that's like putting a bannana in your tailpipe as far as flow goes

    remember Beverly HIlls Cop with Eddie Murphy "we ain't fallin' for no bannana in the tailpipe"

    I've had several sets of 265 exhaust manifolds in my ebay days. one of those items that is junk at a swapmeet but gold on ebay. just like staggard hole valve covers.

    and I believe I've seen those monza malibu monte carlo ones before... real tight.

    a shop did this motor installation... "here's your car, give me my money... oh yeah... you can only turn left now" what a ****ing hack.
     
  7. I went with 94-96 maniflods. They came out pretty cool. I had to weld up some hole and you need to match the port openings to the heads (easy).

    I think they came out ok and they are different. There are NO clearence problems on the drivers side.
     

    Attached Files:

  8. 49ratfink
    Joined: Feb 8, 2004
    Posts: 25,229

    49ratfink
    Member
    from California

    hey tugmaster... do you have that car together now with exhaust pipes? the problem occurs when you crank the wheel all the way to right (I think) and that goofball stock steering moves right up under where the pipe would bolt to the manifold. it doesn't hit the exhaust, but there is not enough clearance to put any pipe on it.

    maybe yours are higher up, the ones on my buddys car look like they dump in just about the same spot, but it has been a couple days since I looked at it.
     
  9. gnarlytyler
    Joined: Feb 2, 2007
    Posts: 1,004

    gnarlytyler
    Member


    those look pretty cool..

    I'm using the 55' manifolds.. no need for performance on the 327, its for my sister. if anything all that backpressure should sound pretty cool for this ride.
     
  10. The shot on the drivers side is a ****ty angle. I do not have pipes on yet but I did crank the wheel all the way over and it will not be a issue with the steering arm. Todd
     
  11. 49ratfink
    Joined: Feb 8, 2004
    Posts: 25,229

    49ratfink
    Member
    from California

    anybody else? man... there's a ****load of 49-54 people here. I thought I would end up with 15 different workable choices.

    guess everyone has sixes, clips or MII front ends.

    thanks tugmaster.. I'll let him know about those.
     
  12. 51NINETYEIGHT
    Joined: Jul 29, 2008
    Posts: 284

    51NINETYEIGHT
    BANNED

    Not sure what manifolds my car has but the are pretty slick looking, I will get you some pics tomorrow.
     
  13. 80's camaro pipes fit well also. They are rear dump and real tight to the block.
     
  14. THE CHIEF
    Joined: Feb 22, 2007
    Posts: 847

    THE CHIEF
    Member
    from MIAMI

    i have 1980 caprice manifolds on a sbc on a 50 poncho
     
  15. bates
    Joined: May 29, 2008
    Posts: 20

    bates
    Member


    I want some of those, when i got my coupe it had the 265 manifolds on a 283 and worked fine. When i upgraded to a well worked 350 i ended up cutting and shutting a ramshorn to get the clearance. After all the cutting and brazing I would never do it again. Still very tight clearance, Im going to ring around and see if I can find some of them over here. Thanks:)
     
  16. Von Rigg Fink
    Joined: Jun 11, 2007
    Posts: 13,401

    Von Rigg Fink
    Member
    from Garage

    I used Sanderson's Block Hugger headers..work great, look good too.
     
  17. To be honest there are unlimited choices on the p***. side. However, the drivers side is a differend story. With my setup (stock steering, C.E. motor mounts) I needed a manifold that dumped betwwen the #5 and# 7 plug. There are quite a few differnt ones. Look on ebay you'll see. Anywa the big thing to watch for is that the downpipe does not hit the pitman are OR the brake pedal.
    The Sandersons were nice but $$$

    Todd
     
  18. poboyross
    Joined: Apr 29, 2009
    Posts: 2,142

    poboyross
    Member
    from West TN

    Hey Tug,

    How did you go about matching the port openings to the heads? Been shopping on EvilBay, and it's between the ones that you're using and the ones from the 265......but if it's not too difficult (and doesn't require any floor mounted shop tools) I was thinking of doing what you've done.
     
  19. 51pontiac
    Joined: Jun 12, 2009
    Posts: 504

    51pontiac
    Member
    from Alberta

    My Canadian Pontiac is the same as the Chevy and I used manifolds from a early 80's Malibu if I remember correctly. Hope this helps.


    [​IMG]
     
  20. chevyshack
    Joined: Dec 28, 2008
    Posts: 950

    chevyshack
    Member

    My 52 has a 1970 350 in it and manifolds dont come close to hitting anything. Dont know what the engine is out of. I ran the numbers and they just say 1970 p***anger car.
     

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.