Register now to get rid of these ads!

80's cars rear end width?

Discussion in 'The Hokey Ass Message Board' started by southpark, Jan 12, 2009.

  1. southpark
    Joined: Aug 2, 2007
    Posts: 712

    southpark
    BANNED

    found a running driving 83 impala, 81 malibu and 80's buick (donor cars for my 52 chevy) just wondering if anybody knows the rearend width on any of these cars? or a good site that does? im not having any trouble finding the wheelbase but the width has been a ***** i have been looking online for the last hour and havent found ****. thanks for the help
     
  2. Gerg
    Joined: Feb 27, 2006
    Posts: 1,828

    Gerg
    Member

  3. 34toddster
    Joined: Mar 28, 2006
    Posts: 1,482

    34toddster
    Member
    from Missouri

    Chevy 1981 and 1980 GM G bodies will fit the best I've found, problem is 2:41 2:52 if you're lucky 2:73
     
  4. southpark
    Joined: Aug 2, 2007
    Posts: 712

    southpark
    BANNED

    cant find any measurements on the impala still the malibu and regal are the right width but the wheelbase is 7 inches short , i dont have a problem lengthening the frame but the 83 impala wheelbase is exact for a 52. anybody??
     
  5. flynbrian48
    Joined: Mar 10, 2008
    Posts: 8,693

    flynbrian48
    Member

    Why don't you just measure it? If it helps at all, I have a '94 Caddy Fleetwood rear axle under my '48 Pontiac convert with 235/75R15's on the stock wheels. With skirts. I'd go out and measure it for ya, but it's too cold.:D
     
  6. southpark
    Joined: Aug 2, 2007
    Posts: 712

    southpark
    BANNED

    these cars are at a local auction cant get around them til you stat bidding
     
  7. rusty48
    Joined: Jan 8, 2007
    Posts: 467

    rusty48
    Member

    Sounds like you'r planning a frame swap,ain't all these cars unibodys?
     
  8. southpark
    Joined: Aug 2, 2007
    Posts: 712

    southpark
    BANNED


    nope they all are full frame cars
     
  9. southpark
    Joined: Aug 2, 2007
    Posts: 712

    southpark
    BANNED

  10. UnIOnViLLEHauNT
    Joined: Jun 22, 2004
    Posts: 4,827

    UnIOnViLLEHauNT
    Member

    G bodys aren't unibody? I could swear they were. Just for personal knowledge I ask.
     
  11. old dirt tracker
    Joined: Sep 20, 2006
    Posts: 1,002

    old dirt tracker
    Member
    from phoenix

    the malibu is probable your best bet.
     
  12. rq375
    Joined: Sep 23, 2008
    Posts: 103

    rq375
    Member
    from Washington

    Nope, Gs are full perimeter frame with a triangulated four link rear. 85-88 can have 3:42 or 3:73 rears because of the OD. the rearends are 7.5" ten bolts though (except GNs and 442s), they puke pretty easy. The GN and 442s are 8.5" ten bolts but go for enough that most step up the a 9" or 12 bolt. They also have front mount steering boxes, so you need to check if you have enough sheetmetal out front to accomodate the box.
     
  13. If you're planning a frame swap, don't even waste your time on the full size cars, the rearend will fit under the fenders but the front end is way too wide. Plus the front horns have to be cut completely off to hang the front end sheetmetal. Have heard Malibu front ends need narrowing to work under a 49-52 also.

    Unless your stock frame is junk there's plenty of easy upgrades for it - an S10 4x4 rear will bolt right on the stock springs with a new hole for the locator pin, and if you don't want to spend the bucks on a Mustang-II kit, a Jag sedan front end unbolts and will be a lot less work than fabbing up a bunch of new body mounts to install.

    In fact personally given what weak, rot prone junk they are I wouldn't use an 80's GM frame under anything. Even when they're solid they bend like a piece of rubber.
     

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.