Register now to get rid of these ads!

here ya go SamIyam, 500 caddy on steroids....

Discussion in 'The Hokey Ass Message Board' started by McGrath, Aug 28, 2004.

  1. McGrath
    Joined: Apr 15, 2002
    Posts: 1,414

    McGrath
    Member

    Went over to see that buddy of mine this morning and took some pics of the Caddy that he is building for his Pulling Truck.

    7" Eagle Rods, Bulldog Aluminum heads, I think he said the Roller Rockers are a Ford application, even the pushrods look huge on this thing. I forgot to ask him what Intake he was using, but the oilpan is a custom sheetmetal job.
     
  2. McGrath
    Joined: Apr 15, 2002
    Posts: 1,414

    McGrath
    Member

    He also used ARP studs everywhere...
     
  3. McGrath
    Joined: Apr 15, 2002
    Posts: 1,414

    McGrath
    Member

  4. McGrath
    Joined: Apr 15, 2002
    Posts: 1,414

    McGrath
    Member

  5. McGrath
    Joined: Apr 15, 2002
    Posts: 1,414

    McGrath
    Member

    Sheetmetal oilpan...
     
  6. McGrath
    Joined: Apr 15, 2002
    Posts: 1,414

    McGrath
    Member

    Drivetrain...
     
  7. McGrath
    Joined: Apr 15, 2002
    Posts: 1,414

    McGrath
    Member

    Some kind of m***ive Rearend with Disc brakes. I think he said it came from a newer Chevy 1-ton...
     
  8. McGrath
    Joined: Apr 15, 2002
    Posts: 1,414

    McGrath
    Member

    Parts Books...
     
  9. McGrath
    Joined: Apr 15, 2002
    Posts: 1,414

    McGrath
    Member

    Adapter for ******...
     
  10. Mojo
    Joined: Jul 23, 2002
    Posts: 1,875

    Mojo
    Member

    How friggin awesome! 7" rods... what's that going to be in cid? 570?
     
  11. McGrath
    Joined: Apr 15, 2002
    Posts: 1,414

    McGrath
    Member

    I forgot to ask what the CID would end up being. I think he said the Rods are actually for a 425 Olds.
     
  12. Fraz
    Joined: Mar 3, 2001
    Posts: 1,818

    Fraz
    Member
    from Dixon, MO

    Rod's are 1/4" longer, so that's what, an extra 1/2" stroke total?


    That's 558ci if that's true.
     
  13. Canadas lowest
    Joined: Aug 19, 2004
    Posts: 15

    Canadas lowest
    Member

    Your connecting rods don't detrimine displacement.bore x stoke. having a longer rod keeps the piston at tdc and bdc longer which gives you a broader power band. I use to build race motors and a 350 with a 5.7 rod is still a 350 with 6" rods. Not trying to be a smart ***...just alittle tech
     
  14. McGrath
    Joined: Apr 15, 2002
    Posts: 1,414

    McGrath
    Member

    I'm pretty sure he said it was bored .030 too. I don't know what the CID is on it though. I guess I should have asked...
     
  15. Fraz
    Joined: Mar 3, 2001
    Posts: 1,818

    Fraz
    Member
    from Dixon, MO

    30 over would make it a 566.
     
  16. DrJ
    Joined: Mar 3, 2001
    Posts: 9,419

    DrJ
    Member

    [ QUOTE ]
    Rod's are 1/4" longer, so that's what, an extra 1/2" stroke total?


    That's 558ci if that's true.

    [/ QUOTE ]

    A longer rod doesn't change or necessarily indicate any change in stroke.
     
  17. Paul
    Joined: Aug 29, 2002
    Posts: 16,984

    Paul
    Editor

    maybe it's time for another tech post adressing crank throw, rod length, pin height,

    horse power verses torque and all that internal geometry stuff..

    I can't imagine the torque that motor must put out!

    more then half a ton of foot pounds betcha!


     
  18. Buick 430 PISTONS will work in the 500 caddy...........
     
  19. Morrisman
    Joined: Dec 9, 2003
    Posts: 1,602

    Morrisman
    Member
    from England

    Is that some sort of spacer under them heads? If he is whacking the rod length up maybe it is.
    Longer rods give less initial piston acceleration and absorb less power than a shorter rod. Plus give less side thrust on the piston skirt.
     
  20. McGrath
    Joined: Apr 15, 2002
    Posts: 1,414

    McGrath
    Member

    [ QUOTE ]
    Is that some sort of spacer under them heads? If he is whacking the rod length up maybe it is.


    [/ QUOTE ]


    If it is he didn't mention it. I imagine he had to use Pistons made to work with the longer Rods. Shorter distance between the wrist-pin and the deck to make up for the difference in Rod length maybe?
     
  21. Mojo
    Joined: Jul 23, 2002
    Posts: 1,875

    Mojo
    Member

    Typically with the Cad 500's, when they get longer rods, it's because the rod journals were offset cut to increase stroke, and needing smaller journal rods. I think the longer rod makes up for that... well, when it's used with custom BBC pistons with a higher pin location. Increasing the stroke, and increasing the rod length (higher pin) are supposed to help the engine build even power. I think the 7" rods and .30 over chevy pistions get it around 540, but you can get a stroker crank that will get you 570cid. I might be wrong about this, I read it in Street Rodder when they did a build up of a 500 a few years ago. I think it's in that cad500 book also.

    Anyhow, awesome motors, they seem to respond to basic rodding in spades.
     
  22. zman
    Joined: Apr 2, 2001
    Posts: 16,790

    zman
    Member
    from Garner, NC

    [ QUOTE ]
    Is that some sort of spacer under them heads?

    [/ QUOTE ]

    Nope that is just the way the Bulldog heads look...
     
  23. A guy we know here built the one I mentioned using the Buick pistons and 429 Ford intake.
    was in a '62 Falcon drag car formerly big block chevy powered...he switched in the 500 Caddy and on the first run it beat the bigblocks best time....but blew a tourque convertor.
    Replaced it and blew one again on the second and third runs....finally realized it had too much tourque for the convertor and took it back out for the big block. [​IMG]
     
  24. NYCDrums
    Joined: Aug 10, 2004
    Posts: 279

    NYCDrums
    Member

    Here's mine. 500, .030 over. Ford intake and other parts from Cad Company, other stuff from MTS. 415 horsepower on the ch***is dyno.

    [​IMG]
     
  25. I've dealt with the Cad company...cool guys they work on Early Cad stuff from time to time also...
     
  26. McGrath
    Joined: Apr 15, 2002
    Posts: 1,414

    McGrath
    Member

    He said he bought most of his stuff from the Maximum Torque outfit. He is figuring over 500 horse, but no idea on Torque. Hopefully he takes it somewhere and runs it on a Dyno. I would like to see what kind of numbers he comes up with.

     
  27. McGrath
    Joined: Apr 15, 2002
    Posts: 1,414

    McGrath
    Member

    bttt

    In case Sam didn't see it. I imagine he was messing with that Bike all day... [​IMG]
     
  28. Yep, I was drooling over it!

    Thanks for posting this stuff... albeit on the high end, but it gives me hope that my motor will tow better than the garden variety SBC. [​IMG]

    I'm soaking it in...
    keep it coming,
    Sam.
     

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.