Register now to get rid of these ads!

Chopping a 1950 Nash Ambassador (Unibody)

Discussion in 'The Hokey Ass Message Board' started by Pre-K, Feb 22, 2009.

  1. kma4444
    Joined: Sep 24, 2008
    Posts: 197

    kma4444
    Member

    I like big ****s and I cannot lie!!!!!!
     
  2. Gigantor
    Joined: Jul 12, 2006
    Posts: 3,818

    Gigantor
    Member

    Stock, these cars are not for everyone - you either love them or spend countless hours thinking about how you would alter it. While I'm not a huge fan (hell I hate it) look of the front wheel openings as they are, I dig the rest of the car. It's got great flow other than those stupid wheel wells. I'd say leave well enough alone or move on to another car. But that picture of the chopped blue one looks ***y as hell. Mad skills to pull that off right there.

    Hey, you want to shave your Nash and sell me your hood ornament on the cheap?
     
  3. Squablow
    Joined: Apr 26, 2005
    Posts: 18,544

    Squablow
    Member

    If I wanted to cut that top, I'd do some reading on how Chevy Fleetlines are cut. The trunklid is going to need more work than the roof will. I read about a chop on the HAMB of a Chevy Fleetline where the trunk was moved forward between the rear fenders, that seemed like the way to do it.

    I also agree that the most height needs to come out of the rear. If you take 3 or 4 all the way around, it's going to have a huge hump in the back. More like 2 in the front and 4 in the rear.

    If it is to retain it's original unibody structure, I'd put in some heavy duty subframe connectors and I'd brace it up really good before the first cut is made.
     
  4. Pre-K
    Joined: Jun 27, 2007
    Posts: 219

    Pre-K
    Member
    from Ventura

    Like I said before, there is NO other car for me, and I am chopping THIS ONE. One-two" in front, 4-5" in the rear. It's all on paper or my head...

    Trying to get my buddies frame rack, which is under another friend of his dormant project.

    I like the idea of lowering the trunk, which I have read about. Any pics or links?
     
  5. twochops
    Joined: Feb 28, 2006
    Posts: 1,510

    twochops
    Member

    Wish I could help you with a photoshop of
    your Nash but every time I try to do it,
    it comes out a station wagon----sorry
     

    Attached Files:

    ratfink56 likes this.
  6. Goztrider
    Joined: Feb 17, 2007
    Posts: 3,066

    Goztrider
    Member
    from Tulsa, OK

    Now the wagon thing looks slick! Chop THAT top and see where it takes you.

    Regardless, this thing needs a severe chop to be sleek. I'm thinking chopped Hudson look, but the key is going to be the decklid.
     
  7. Belchfire8
    Joined: Sep 18, 2005
    Posts: 1,540

    Belchfire8
    Member


    Mild chop and lowering...
     

    Attached Files:

  8. mrjynx
    Joined: Nov 24, 2008
    Posts: 970

    mrjynx
    BANNED

    I just saw the blue car... so you want to lower it like that... so it takes the "seam" down and has no wheel wells...

    what are your thoughts on the boot then? you want to keep that back large, or take it down like I did in the other pic?
     
  9. mrjynx
    Joined: Nov 24, 2008
    Posts: 970

    mrjynx
    BANNED

  10. What happens if you section 4 to 6 inches out of the middle of the car? To me the roof on these looks fine, the sides just look like an old man's trousers pulled way up high water.
     
  11. To chop that vehicle you'll really have to do some good engineering.<O:p></O:p>
    Given that it's an early unitized constructed vehicle, and has no conventional frame under it, you'll wanna sleeve and weld completely all joints/cuts. Any where you don't, you'll have a box with no bottom-can you spell trapazoid?<O:p></O:p>

    Yup. TrapEzoid ;)
     
  12. Belchfire8
    Joined: Sep 18, 2005
    Posts: 1,540

    Belchfire8
    Member

    Sectioned ???:eek:
     

    Attached Files:

  13. Goztrider
    Joined: Feb 17, 2007
    Posts: 3,066

    Goztrider
    Member
    from Tulsa, OK

    The car above looks like a 2 door he**** with a rolled rear.
     
  14. Belchfire8
    Joined: Sep 18, 2005
    Posts: 1,540

    Belchfire8
    Member

    O.K. how about chopped and sectioned?
     

    Attached Files:

  15. mrjynx
    Joined: Nov 24, 2008
    Posts: 970

    mrjynx
    BANNED

    I had a go with the blue one and did something between them all....

    [​IMG]
     
  16. It does look better sectioned with the chop - a lot of work but it would really turn heads when it was done. But the vanity plate would have to read "ELECTROLUX" ... yeah I know it's too many letters.
     
  17. Pre-K
    Joined: Jun 27, 2007
    Posts: 219

    Pre-K
    Member
    from Ventura

    Amazing... Huge, too!
     
  18. Pre-K
    Joined: Jun 27, 2007
    Posts: 219

    Pre-K
    Member
    from Ventura

    And loosing my Hump? Be cool as a convertible, tho...

    I'll past some more tomorrow, after converting.
     
  19. Unkl Ian
    Joined: Mar 29, 2001
    Posts: 13,509

    Unkl Ian

    Tail fins, like the '51 Nash will kill a lot of the Fat *** look.
     
  20. Unkl Ian
    Joined: Mar 29, 2001
    Posts: 13,509

    Unkl Ian

    Very quick and rough, I moved the roof and trunk as a unit,
    forward and down. This maintains the flow of the roof.
     

    Attached Files:

  21. Erik B
    Joined: Sep 4, 2006
    Posts: 2,069

    Erik B
    Member

    Unkl Ian- you are on the right track there. I saw a magazine article on chopping a 48-49 fastback Cad and that's how they did it. I would not change the car too much and loose it's "Nashiness".

    They just seem to float!
     
  22. Unkl Ian
    Joined: Mar 29, 2001
    Posts: 13,509

    Unkl Ian

    Yes, a friend of mine did a '39 Ford Humpback that way,
    the profile of the roof and truck lid stayed the same,
    just slid forward and down. Looked factory.


    Any other way almost guarantees a kink or flat spot somewhere.
     
  23. Gettin' off topic here but that has a Pacer look. I had always wondered what a photo shopped Pacer would look like. Here's an AMC that was a pretty tough ride.

    amx-400.jpg
     
  24. Jeem
    Joined: Sep 12, 2002
    Posts: 5,882

    Jeem
    Alliance Vendor

    OK, try this.....remove the decklid and all the sheetmetal north of the stainless beltline trim, find an early VW 23 window bus, chop it a bunch and graft the two together. You'll want to maintain the Nash windshield and ditch, probably, two sets of windows from each side of the bus body, leave the nifty sliding ragtop.
    EASY as pie. Imagine owning the only 15 window, Amb***ador open air cruise vessel.....
     
  25. James D
    Joined: Feb 8, 2007
    Posts: 4,982

    James D
    Member

    I have an inkling that you´re not being entirely serious.;)
     
  26. chevy3755
    Joined: Feb 6, 2006
    Posts: 1,056

    chevy3755
    Member

    i would leave it un-chopped.....i have a 50 nash.....just starting to mini-tub it......just a tub......thinking about painting it Mary K pink
     
  27. Belchfire8
    Joined: Sep 18, 2005
    Posts: 1,540

    Belchfire8
    Member

    I hope not!:rolleyes:
     

    Attached Files:

  28. I love the looks of the stock appearing 2 dr wagon. I even like the looks of the front fenders being cut. The Nash's are are cool car. I wonder how the seats feel when using as a bed. I never had a chance to find out in the couple of Nash's I had over the years.
     
  29. I think skirts on the rear....
     
  30. Pre-K
    Joined: Jun 27, 2007
    Posts: 219

    Pre-K
    Member
    from Ventura

    Have had my fill of wagons, although the "Nomash" is cool.

    I have a '57 Rambler V8 Cross Country Custom V8 for sale currently. Gee... I should post it here. I was looking for a rear window when I started a relationship with an eye doctor in Texas, and next thing I knew I was the owner of the very straight and complete Brougham.

    **** Ugly grows on you. As I plan on living in this car (well, kidding, the bed doesn't really work in Broughams because of the canted rear bucket seats and center arm rest) I do not want a Bonneville chop or channel job.

    I figured the truck and roof need to stay together, just slop more into the rear bumper. I think the truck lid is going to need shaping on the sides, as will the roof, which is narrower than the fenders as it comes down.

    Here is my before and after on the blue one:
     

    Attached Files:

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.