Register now to get rid of these ads!

I need some '40 Plymouth advise...

Discussion in 'The Hokey Ass Message Board' started by OoltewahSpeedShop, Mar 25, 2009.

  1. OoltewahSpeedShop
    Joined: Oct 18, 2007
    Posts: 3,103

    OoltewahSpeedShop
    Member

    One of my buddies that hangs out at my shop just bought a '40 Plymouth Coupe and is asking about front suspension. What's the best front end to put under one of these cars? M-II would be my guess, but I don't know. Anybody have a better idea for suspension and brakes?

    Thanks,
    Kevin
    Ooltewah Speed Shop
     
    Last edited: Mar 25, 2009
  2. 46binder
    Joined: Jan 21, 2008
    Posts: 245

    46binder
    Member
    from Kenosha,Wi

    Try a Dodge Dakota subframe. I put one under my 49 wayfarer.
     
  3. OoltewahSpeedShop
    Joined: Oct 18, 2007
    Posts: 3,103

    OoltewahSpeedShop
    Member

    Come on Mopar guys.
     
  4. RodStRace
    Joined: Dec 7, 2007
    Posts: 6,771

    RodStRace
    Member

    Easiest and cheapest=rebuild and change the upper shock mount.
    Next up, dropped uprights and disc brake conversion.
    That's as far as I'm going.
    Next, rack and pinion. This is a must if you want something besides stock flatty, Small block mopar or shivver-lay. Those can be made to clear the stock steering box/column.
    After that, you have to subframe it, build new rails or do a frame swap.
    Subframes can be narrowed chevy, late 70s mopar, or some oddball stuff (Pacer?)
    Rails will be tubing that fits the frame stubs and the suspension you have in mind.
    Frame swap could be Dakota, but I haven't seen a complete course on that one.

    The stock frame does not lend itself to MII kits, since it's not flat and simple. It's a decent though dated Short-Long Arm (SLA) independant front suspension.
     

    Attached Files:

  5. plym49
    Joined: Aug 9, 2008
    Posts: 2,802

    plym49
    Member
    from Earth

    Fatman sells kits. That's one way to go. I hear their stuff is pretty good.

    An alternative is a Jaguar XJ front end. Complete unit with power rack and pinion, monster brakes, and superb geometry. It comes out as a unit. All you need to do is weld it in (or mount oon rubber, like on the Jags) and fabricate an upper shock mount. Cheap and easy to rebuild. 4 3/4 inch bolt pattern, too.

    Any XJ6, XJ12 or XJ-S will do. They are all the same; the 12 cylinder cars had heavier coils.
     
  6. Retro Jim
    Joined: May 27, 2007
    Posts: 3,854

    Retro Jim
    Member

    There are a few different companies that sell nice front end change overs for that 40 Plymouth .
     
  7. plym_46
    Joined: Sep 8, 2005
    Posts: 4,018

    plym_46
    Member
    from central NY

    What is his disatisfaction with the current front end??? Aside from the king pins, it pretty modern and functions well. An upgrade to frame mounted shocks, perhaps a larger sway bar and an upgrade to disc brakes, yields a dependable nice riding car. Dropped spindles from fatman, or shorter coils from espo will get the car lower if thats part of the program.
     
  8. plmczy
    Joined: Aug 3, 2001
    Posts: 2,408

    plmczy
    Member

    My 40 dodge tudor is subbed with a 79 f-body subframe. I purchased the car with it already installed, so nobody gives me grief;). There is plenty of room to use headers(I'm using a set of e-body Hooker comps),room between the firewall and motor with no need to cut it. I used 81 Dodge truck motor mounts and oil pan, lots of room between oil pan and sub cradle and motor sits nice and level. Only draw back is you have to tuck the front wheels back in as the sub is a little wide. later shawn
     
  9. BuiltFerComfort
    Joined: Jan 24, 2007
    Posts: 1,619

    BuiltFerComfort
    Member

    'olddaddy' here on the hamb sells front disc conversion kits that take standard Mopar rotors and calipers.
     
  10. Aloha Kevin ,I did one about 15 years ago with a rear steer nova sub frame fit real nice used nova heddders stock motor mounts and power steering to boot.Fit real easy if decide to go this way pm me and i will tell you exactly how I did it. I have some pics but can't scan them
     
  11. missysdad1
    Joined: Dec 9, 2008
    Posts: 3,307

    missysdad1
    Member

    If you want the car low you've got to use a narrow front suspension. If you plan to use bias ply 15" tires it needs to be narrower still...unless you plan to radius the front fenders.

    Subframe swaps are tempting because they are cheap, but you often end up with some pretty ugly unintended consequences :mad:. Do some searches for MoPars with subs and you'll see what I mean.

    After doing some extensive research, Ray Lund (the very talented builder of my chassis) elected to fabricate a Z'd frame stub from tubing and use a Fat Man Mustang II kit. He also used dropped front spindles to get it really low...WITH NO BAGS! :D

    If you plan to use bags you can cheat a bit :eek:, but if you prefer to go really low without bags this combo works great. Rides and handles wonderful and the appearance speaks for itself.

    You'll need to attach skid plates to the bottom of the frame rails at the front kickup as it does rub the ground at that point occasionally...and be real sure that none of your mechanical stuff extends below the bottom of the frame! :eek::eek::eek:

    Good luck!
     

    Attached Files:

  12. ECIGUY
    Joined: Feb 24, 2009
    Posts: 111

    ECIGUY
    Member

    If you decide to keep the stock front end we make a bolt-on disc brake conversion.
     
  13. 4woody
    Joined: Sep 4, 2002
    Posts: 2,110

    4woody
    Member

    Keep the stock front end, add discs and shock mounts. Rack & pinion if you want (Fatman makes a R&P kit- do not use a quick ratio rack). No reason to sub it.
     
  14. drpushbutton
    Joined: Oct 28, 2008
    Posts: 43

    drpushbutton
    Member
    from Kansas

    I've attached some pics of what I used but the stock front crossmember has such a deep dip that really low ride heights may cause a really loud scrapping sound on bumps. If you want a super low stance I'd say the Fatman front sub frame with MII is a better choice.
     

    Attached Files:

  15. plym49
    Joined: Aug 9, 2008
    Posts: 2,802

    plym49
    Member
    from Earth


    Or................the Jaguar front crossmembers. Jags, especially the XJ-S models, had very low ride heights and the crossmember is nice and flush along the bottom.
     
  16. 73RR
    Joined: Jan 29, 2007
    Posts: 7,339

    73RR
    Member

    ..X2 on the Jag...I bought a complete 86 XJ-6 donor for one of my '50 Wayfarer projects. Jag parts are readily available and reasonably priced.

    .
     

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.