Carburetor Controversy

I had no idea this thread was going to be this freakin' funny!!!

 

So true. I wooden have thought so either!

Bob

 

Cool thread. I have 3 94's on my ride. They are progressive so it works pretty good. I raosted a 34 ford with a 401 with dual quads./ so I guess it runs pretty good. Oh mine is a 350. and the cars were about the same weight.

 

Yeah, them deuces will give that flattie lotsa BALSA. He's really gonna kick some ASH with them at the track and be real POPLAR at the drive in.

 

I thought carbs were illegal on pinewood derby cars. If I wood have saw those I wood have dusted the first round.

 

Mount them on a cylinder block CylinderBrock intake

 

smart man! gggg

 

May need a set of these to go with the intake...

super nice 94's

 

the wood is for the new flathead tunnel ram mold!

 

And an electronic fuel injector is nothing more than a ********?


Regardless of who said it, I don't think a lot of guys realize what a sophisticated device a carburetor is....

 

I always figure that when someone tells me that this or that carburetor "****s" more air. lol

 

Wooden it be nice if posters just answered the question? This thread kind of goes against the grain.

Of course, the high performance manifold previously pictured, is probably an extension of the Acorn manufacturing company, which produced carburetors in the 'teens. Strange that these were never used on the Oakland cars. ☺

Jon.

 

That little mill should have a nice bark.......KNOT!

 

This thread is full of jokes my dad would make! I love it!

 

Matched heads and intake? I'll bet you wear a tie!

I like Evans Manifolds and Navarro Heads..........

Alan

 

My most sincere apologies, Mrs. Weeks! Consider we informed Ma'am. Lol!

 

I think the carb on the right would more likely say, "I've got a headache."

 

man there are some blockheads on this board . I think that should about nail it.