Register now to get rid of these ads!

Does this thing look too long?

Discussion in 'The Hokey Ass Message Board' started by R Frederick, Jun 29, 2009.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. R Frederick
    Joined: Mar 30, 2009
    Posts: 2,658

    R Frederick
    Member
    from illinois

    Funny question for a guy to be asking huh? Finally got everything together and rolling. So I rolled it out into the sun where I could get away from it and look at the overall car. Wheelbase is 20" by the time I got everything put together. Still mocking up, still time to tweak things - like swapping spindles and moving the front axle back, etc. Not much room to change the rear, I'm kindof short on my suspension already.
    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
     
    Last edited: Jun 29, 2009
  2. R Frederick
    Joined: Mar 30, 2009
    Posts: 2,658

    R Frederick
    Member
    from illinois

    Couple rear suspension pics, speak up if something doesn't look like it will work. I still need to set pinion angle and box the frame horn in, etc.
    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
     
  3. skunx1964
    Joined: Aug 21, 2008
    Posts: 1,455

    skunx1964
    Member

    yep it does, and if you get a flat in front youll do a flip or eat steering wheel. just my opinion tho....
     
  4. With the radiator set back I'd say the proportions look right. Good stance.
     
  5. DougnDog
    Joined: Feb 28, 2007
    Posts: 8

    DougnDog
    Member

    I think it looks fine.....go for it
     
  6. R Frederick
    Joined: Mar 30, 2009
    Posts: 2,658

    R Frederick
    Member
    from illinois

    I know, I have to increase the ride height yet till by front arms are level. That will get my springs up over the lower rim.
     
  7. Crankhole
    Joined: Apr 7, 2005
    Posts: 2,644

    Crankhole
    Member

    That is the shortest set of rear bones that I've ever seen. Can't say how well they'd function though.
     
  8. The front end scares the **** out of me. Hanging the spring from split bones has become quite a fad, but bones were never designed to carry the weight. Wall thickness is way to thin, let alone the amount of side pressure the welded tubing can withstand before failure.
    I'd suggest starting over. Put the weight of the weight of the front on the axle where it was originally designed to be. Adjust the ride height by the location of the perch on teh crossmember.
    Yea, I know lots of cars are being built lately with the spring on split bones, but that doesn't make it a legit engineering design.
     
  9. I thought this was going to be a Sausage Question !!! >>>>.
     
  10. Donmon
    Joined: Feb 3, 2009
    Posts: 208

    Donmon
    Member

    Esthetically it looks great!
    I like the front arms going through the frame, how many degrees at the front king pins?
    I am concerned about Rich’s comment on the front spring mount, I fall into the same category of mounting to the split arms, although I am mounting on top of my arm and not hanging way down like yours: Rich- Will keeping the mount close to the RR piviot pin and keeping the shackle eye beefy still be an issue?
     
  11. R Frederick
    Joined: Mar 30, 2009
    Posts: 2,658

    R Frederick
    Member
    from illinois

    Suicide front perches scare the **** out of me, thus the cross member. I have to set the ride height higher in front till the bones are level, that will get my springs above the scrub line. I'm also planning on making a steel collar to hang my spring perch on the bone without drilling into it. Like I say, I have a lot to figure out yet. I'm just glad I can roll it in and out of the garage at this point.
     
  12. hemi
    Joined: Jul 11, 2001
    Posts: 1,959

    hemi
    Member

    Yes, and it's too low. The way it is now, the cross member is more dangerous than a suicide perch. Maybe you could look into a dropped axle instead.
     
  13. R Frederick
    Joined: Mar 30, 2009
    Posts: 2,658

    R Frederick
    Member
    from illinois

    My Kingpins are at a little over 5 degrees at ride height, I'm a little below ride height because of the way I mounted my (garage transportation) hangers.
     
  14. sawzall
    Joined: Jul 15, 2002
    Posts: 4,758

    sawzall
    Member

    rear suspension scares me too..

    the short "control arms you've built there would seem to provide everything BUT control..

    I dont like the front spring hangers as others have mentioned.. but you only asked about the "length" of the car
     
  15. alchemy
    Joined: Sep 27, 2002
    Posts: 22,682

    alchemy
    Member

    Your rear wishbones are WAY too short. Something will break if you leave them that way. There will be no rotational twist anywhere in that rear setup, and a weld or the tubing is gonna crack.

    If you don't believe me, put a couple tacks on the axle-to-wishbone brackets, then try jacking up one end of the axle. I'd lay money that you will go up about two inches before the other side comes up, or your tackwelds break.
     
  16. fleetside66
    Joined: Nov 20, 2006
    Posts: 3,136

    fleetside66
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    In my eyes, it looks too long. However, beauty is in the eyes of the beholder. I think you might be leaning in my direction, too. What can you do at this point to shorten things up a bit? I think if the centerline of the front wheels was even with the radiator, it would feel much better to me. But again, that's just me. It looks like you could move the tub to the front a couple of inches, which might help to remedy the (what I perceive as) excessive length .
     
  17. blasted
    Joined: Feb 10, 2006
    Posts: 262

    blasted
    Member
    from N. Tex

    The whole rear set up is scary to me.
    If 1 rear tire go's over a bump and not the other how will the rear articulate. With a 3 point axle mount, a encapusulated front bushing and a very short arm, it looks like a receipt for trouble.
    We could go on but not. I would think it is time to rethink before some gets hurt.
     
  18. Roothawg
    Joined: Mar 14, 2001
    Posts: 25,962

    Roothawg
    Member

    I am also concerned about the rear bones more than the length. You won't get much arc out of that.
     
  19. R Frederick
    Joined: Mar 30, 2009
    Posts: 2,658

    R Frederick
    Member
    from illinois

    I think you are right on the rear set-up. I intended on running the bones outside the frame, but the angle of the mount was too extreme. I have hairpins that I think I may go to. Or just conrol arms with bushings.
     
  20. ratster
    Joined: Sep 23, 2001
    Posts: 3,626

    ratster
    Member

    yep, its to long
     
  21. R Frederick
    Joined: Mar 30, 2009
    Posts: 2,658

    R Frederick
    Member
    from illinois

    The black marker line on the frame was where I originally intended the firewall to be. Looking at it now, I think I'll scoot the body up and look at it again.
     
  22. Gearhead Graphics
    Joined: Oct 4, 2008
    Posts: 3,890

    Gearhead Graphics
    Member
    from Denver Co

    Both front and rear look like the could sure use a revisit.
    ****s to have to back up as far as it should be. Better to do it now though than to have a major failure in the future while going down the road.
    I'm no expert on fronts, but the rear really bothers me.
     
  23. kraka138
    Joined: Oct 3, 2007
    Posts: 293

    kraka138
    Member

    20 inch wheel base....id say that pretty short, is this a go cart?
     

  24. Realistically, the closer the spring mount is to the front of the bone, the stronger the mount will be, and the less potential flexing of the bone. A slug welded into the bone is mandatory. It's really not the beefiness of the mount, but the lack of strength of the bone.
     
  25. chickenridgerods
    Joined: Jul 22, 2003
    Posts: 1,548

    chickenridgerods
    Member
    from DSM, IA

    You do realize that you essentially do have a "suicide" front axle? Break a shackle and your crossmember/spring will be in the pavement - it will not be stopped by the axle as it would with a traditional setup. I'd say your current setup is scarier than the traditional suicide perch setup. At least the traditional style relys on a beefy welded bracket to hold the ch***is up; you're relying on some relatively think and weak shackles.

    Your rear radius rods are also way too short; the longer, the better.

    My advice, tear out BOTH the front and rear suspensions and start over.
     
  26. JohnEvans
    Joined: Apr 13, 2008
    Posts: 4,883

    JohnEvans
    Member
    from Phoenix AZ

    Experiance tells me you will end up hating the radical channel. And the rear radius arms are WAY to short. With any suspension movement at all the pinion angles will be all over the place.
     
  27. dante81_98
    Joined: Sep 26, 2005
    Posts: 504

    dante81_98
    Member

    whew, tough crowd
     
  28. START OVER!!!! I like the long low look to but come on. This car will get you killed more likley sooner than later. Take the advice you are getting here and get the susp. geometry at least close to right. That rear end mounting scares the **** out of me.:eek: Please rethink at least that part. The front end is so far below scrub it may hit on uneven surfaces. Function and saftey over looks.
     
  29. TV
    Joined: Aug 28, 2002
    Posts: 1,451

    TV
    Member

    I'm not gonna beat you up for your early set up, but please pay attention to all the comments. Now is the time to change your set up and make it work right for a long time.--TV
     
  30. Kevin Lee
    Joined: Nov 12, 2001
    Posts: 7,675

    Kevin Lee
    Super Moderator
    Staff Member

    Wheelbase too long. Radiator too tall. And those rear link things are short. I do not think it is overall too low - just really weird proportions. You have some good parts they just need to be adjusted.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.