Register now to get rid of these ads!

289 swap

Discussion in 'The Hokey Ass Message Board' started by NCKalex, Jul 16, 2009.

  1. NCKalex
    Joined: Nov 23, 2008
    Posts: 188

    NCKalex
    Member
    from Fresno, CA

    Did a little bit of searching, guess I didn't use the right combination of keywords. My question is, if i swapped a 289 in will it bolt up to the stock 3 speed on the tree ****** or will i have to swap ******s as well? 1952 ford mainline coupe btw.
     
  2. Fuzzy Knight
    Joined: Jun 8, 2009
    Posts: 11,806

    Fuzzy Knight
    Member
    from Santee, Ca

    First I am not sure that the bolt pattern on the trans is the same early and late but it probably is. Next the flathead is a rear sump motor. the 289 is a front sump which means you need to make a box in the front crossmember to set the pan in.
    I have a 53 with a 390 and a C6. running stock 390 exhaust every thing fit great. Trans set right on the rear crossmember just had to relocate the holes a bit.
    Convert the stock radiator over to one in one out and it will cool fine. Also you need to run a remote oil filter as the one on the 289 will run right into the front crossmember.
    Good Luck
     
  3. Gearhead_666
    Joined: Dec 5, 2008
    Posts: 45

    Gearhead_666
    Member

    From what i can see your new to the H.A.M.B.
    if you haven't introduced yourself yet then i would recomend going to the message board and let people know who you are and what you have done to your automobile. As a 1953 ford owner myself there is alot of good information in here, but you have too look around. i belong to the 1952-56 ford "social group" and there are alot of other members who have the same make and model who can answer your qustions. Good luck and welcome to the Hamb.

    ~gearhead_666
     
  4. revkev6
    Joined: Jun 13, 2006
    Posts: 3,350

    revkev6
    Member
    from ma

    take everything I say on SBF's with a huge grain of salt cuz I'll be the first to admit I'm not very knowledgable on em, but on the rear sump vs. front sump, I believe the early bronco pan is rear sump. We used a 68 302 in a model A sedan we built for my mother a while back that we converted to rear sump.
     
  5. junkyardjeff
    Joined: Jul 23, 2005
    Posts: 8,702

    junkyardjeff
    Member

    If you use a 64 on back 289 with the 5 bolt bellhousing you should be able to use the original 52 trans,in 65 they went to the 6 bolt bellhousing and the trans bolt pattern changed too.
     
  6. vertible59
    Joined: Jan 25, 2009
    Posts: 1,058

    vertible59
    Member

    The trans will bolt to the 289 bellhousing. Using a front sump pan and butchering the front crossmember is unnecessary. The rear sump, Fox ch***is oil pan and ***ociated parts, first appeared in 1978 in the V-8 Fairmont and Zephyr. Since then, thousands have been used in eveything from Mustangs to Lincolns, so the rear sump stuff is plentyful today. This type oil pan gives you more clearance than the Bronco pan, and will bolt right on your 289.
     
  7. texag09
    Joined: Jun 26, 2008
    Posts: 223

    texag09
    Member

    I had a 289 Bolted too a 3spd in a 64 Fairlane, ***uming this is the same ****** or a close derivative, the key is like junkyardjeff said ensure you have a 64 or earlier block, easy to do just count the bolts in the back.
     

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.