Register now to get rid of these ads!

Ford vs. Chevy

Discussion in 'The Hokey Ass Message Board' started by NuzzyFipples, Jul 22, 2009.

  1. xlr8
    Joined: Jun 26, 2006
    Posts: 700

    xlr8
    Member
    from Idaho

    The thing that's kind of ironic is that the wood bodied cars were considered superior at the time, and they were. The doors closed with a solid thunk and the bodies were very quiet. Fords were considered tinny and cheap. The GM cars were mechanically superior in almost every way too, featuring overhead valves on several of the lines and they were quicker to adopt such advances as hydraulic brakes. Funny that the cheapo car ended up being the survivor.
     
  2. filthy frank
    Joined: Jan 25, 2008
    Posts: 541

    filthy frank
    Member

    i have to agree with ajmopar,i have a 33 ply with a hemi,even though i still like chevys,i have two of them,but,if i had the cash,id buy my friends 32 ford chopped sedan.
     
  3. JeffreyJames
    Joined: Jun 13, 2007
    Posts: 16,626

    JeffreyJames
    Member
    from SUGAR CITY

    Your definitely correct on the "thunk". Closing a Ford and a Chevy side by side is almost a joke. The chevy sounds like a new Lexus (alright maybe not that good) and the Fords sounds like a screen door on your Grandmas cottage.

    Chevy definitely had a more refined car in just about every way but it's those things that steer most away now.
     
  4. xderelict
    Joined: Jul 30, 2006
    Posts: 2,475

    xderelict
    Member Emeritus

    The same amount of work to build either hotrod would yield a more valuable end with the Fford.That being said I can't wait to start on the 32 chevy 5w in the garage.
     
  5. -Brent-
    Joined: Nov 20, 2006
    Posts: 7,856

    -Brent-
    Member

    You crack me up! :D
     
  6. pasadenahotrod
    Joined: Feb 13, 2007
    Posts: 11,772

    pasadenahotrod
    Member
    from Texas

    Survivability has to do with construction, wood-framed vs steel, and continued popularity.
    The construction issue contends with Mother Nature, rot and rust, and human nature, American haven't been the most religious of car maintainers since day one.
    The combination of human nature (allowing the top material to deteriorate and not be correctly repaired so water intrudes into the wood structure) and Mother Nature (taking advantage of human nature's bad points) make survivability of wood structured cars very difficult.
    The continued popularity issue is only human nature. If a car has a large audience of appreciative owners and want-to-be-owners when introduced and keeps that audience over the years and the decades, and now nearing the century mark for some, it will survive in far greater numbers than even other steel structured cars of possibly superior quality or styling.
     
    lucky likes this.
  7. PBRmeASAP
    Joined: Aug 26, 2002
    Posts: 6,893

    PBRmeASAP
    Member

    Chevys look better. Yes the wood ****s to replace, but i did it in my 31, and looking forward to stepping into my 32 soon. Fords are everywhere, which is not a big deal, but the amount of complements i get with my chevy made the extra work worth it. not to mention i'm a chevy guy
     
  8. Find a car that you like the overall look and start building. Ford, Chevy, Mopar, whatever, it's gonna be a hot rod and to me hot rodding means doing your thing within your means and ability. Build it safe and enjoy the **** out of it when you get it runnin. Not everyone can afford to build a 32 Ford, but everyone can afford to have fun.
     
  9. 39 All Ford
    Joined: Sep 15, 2008
    Posts: 1,530

    39 All Ford
    Member
    from Benton AR

    I THINK that this statement is a bit too general....

    Old Henry had some "eccentric" ideas (egocentric if you prefer) that were carried over into his cars, but this in no way should be confused with "cheapo".....

    Admittedly, had Henry not not been so stuck on some of his "better ideas" Fords would have been better, but still, they have proved to be the cars that have lasted, and,,, it seems as if Ford has outlived GM as a company as well.....

    Who would have thought....
     
  10. el Scotto
    Joined: Mar 3, 2004
    Posts: 4,722

    el Scotto
    Member
    from Tracy, CA

    truth!!
     
  11. billbrown
    Joined: Dec 24, 2007
    Posts: 595

    billbrown
    BANNED

    [

    I see all of these bad*** Ford's with Chevy engines and think why not put a Ford motor in your Ford, or just build a Chevy and throw your 350 in it?



    big block chevy. big block indeed.
     
  12. kwoodyh
    Joined: Apr 11, 2006
    Posts: 641

    kwoodyh
    Member

    Mostly because of the V8, never knew the wood figured into the deal?
     
  13. thirtytwo
    Joined: Dec 19, 2003
    Posts: 2,652

    thirtytwo
    Member

    fords are easy to build...back in the day anything up to 48 ford would bolt onto a 32 -48 with very little modification , you want to put a 53 merc motor in a 32 ford ...it would bolt right in ....chevys can be cool but they are not what the m***es want ...if you want to build it for yourself build what you like but unless you are a hell of a carpenter ,or fabricator,i wouldnt tackle a chevy, and when your done its still worth half of what its ford counterpart is
     
  14. 39cent
    Joined: Apr 4, 2006
    Posts: 1,569

    39cent
    Member
    from socal

     
  15. rtomss
    Joined: Jan 9, 2009
    Posts: 242

    rtomss
    Member

    NuzzyFipples.......Thirtytwo knows what he's talking about. I know because I bought a 32' 5 window Chevy that he built (and it awesome).......from a pile as he describes it. Looking at the amount of fab work put into the interstructure it's definitely not a first timers project. Having something different draws just the right amount of attention. Those that don't know think it's a Ford....and those who do want to know more.
     
  16. PBRmeASAP
    Joined: Aug 26, 2002
    Posts: 6,893

    PBRmeASAP
    Member

    rtomss....do you live near Mick (9 ball)(own's a 38 chev)? I was over there the other day and he said something about a guy owning a 32 chevy up the road....gotta be either you or Mike B.
     
  17. Ghost28
    Joined: Nov 23, 2008
    Posts: 3,192

    Ghost28
    Member

    Of course the chevy wood rotted out, which left the sheetmetal to just fold up on itself. That is how I bought my 32 chevy 5 window, and my 28 coach, in pieces. $200.00 for the coupe and $400.00 for the coach. But the benefit to this, is starting with a blank canvas which I like to do. And I don't replace wood, I'm not good at it. Adding the metal structure is not as bad as everyone thinks, and allows you to be a little creative with your build. Just think about 6 steps ahead and you will be fine. You would think that with all these chevys just rotting away that the price of a 32 ford would be a little more reasonable, cause they should be more plentiful. But for every chevy that rotted away, prolly two fords were lost to circle track racing. Cause the steel structure did not explode when hit like a chevy, fords were the car of choice for the dirt tracks. Here is a couple pics of my 28 in pieces...John
     

    Attached Files:

  18. rtomss
    Joined: Jan 9, 2009
    Posts: 242

    rtomss
    Member

    PBRmeASAP.......yep, that's me. I live in Franklin and talked to Mick yesterday. I might be headed over by him this weekend. I remember talking to you on here last year.....what's new? Are you getting ready for Big Carl and Cheater's gig?
     
  19. NuzzyFipples
    Joined: Jul 8, 2009
    Posts: 112

    NuzzyFipples
    Member

    The information and advise you all have given me is awesome. I really appreciate the input. THANK YOU!!!

    RTOMMSS (or anyone else, please... thanks for some of the other pics) do you have some pictures of the wooden structures, your builds, or step by step's you can post? I'd just like to see some of the work you put into YOUR Chevy. The more and more I read, the more challenging this seems to be, and I am leaning real hard towards a 32 Chevy rod. I love a good challenge.
     
  20. Ghost28
    Joined: Nov 23, 2008
    Posts: 3,192

    Ghost28
    Member

    Here is a 32 5 window that I built awhile back. (Not for this board). but I liked it. Full 92 corvette suspension, motor, and trans. chopped 4 inches front, and 1 inch through the rear window, suicide doors, and converted to 3 window. running c5 corvette wheels. And again replaced all the wood with steel. This car was real quiet and solid, body wise going down the road...John
     

    Attached Files:

  21. PBRmeASAP
    Joined: Aug 26, 2002
    Posts: 6,893

    PBRmeASAP
    Member

    do you hit any of the local weekly shows? Wend at McD's on 76? Tue at HD mesuem? if ya ever head out to those PM me let me know...I'd like to take a good look at your 32.

    here's a few wood replacement shots to inspire you....

    and a few in progress with wood in place
     

    Attached Files:

  22. NuzzyFipples
    Joined: Jul 8, 2009
    Posts: 112

    NuzzyFipples
    Member

    Wow. Very cool. Def. an inspiration.

    What type of wood was originally used, do you know? :confused:
     
  23. PBRmeASAP
    Joined: Aug 26, 2002
    Posts: 6,893

    PBRmeASAP
    Member

    It was mixed, some was original some was replaced, but as far as what kind, i have no idea

    Do you have a coupe lined up? or just looking? post up some pics if you have one please
     
  24. Dick Dake
    Joined: Sep 14, 2006
    Posts: 788

    Dick Dake
    Member

    Did the old Mopars use wood? Who else used wood framing during that time?
     
  25. NuzzyFipples
    Joined: Jul 8, 2009
    Posts: 112

    NuzzyFipples
    Member

    possibly lined up. still debating based on the thread info. The body there is no wood. all has rotted away.
     
  26. PBRmeASAP
    Joined: Aug 26, 2002
    Posts: 6,893

    PBRmeASAP
    Member

    DO IT!!!!!!!!!! stop thinking about it and get it!
     
  27. Ghost28
    Joined: Nov 23, 2008
    Posts: 3,192

    Ghost28
    Member

    As far as I know most of the general motors cars were coach built with wood. Cause I heard that general motors, or there parent company owned a lumber mill and required fisher to use the wood products from this mill for there bodys. And that is why they stayed with wood structures until 37. Correct me if I am wrong. But as for your question I think all makes used wood in different amounts until the late 30s, chevy just used more of it....And yeah go get that 32 chevy coupe.
     
  28. Truckedup
    Joined: Jul 25, 2006
    Posts: 4,660

    Truckedup
    Member

    I know little about early Chevy cars,but 37 Chevy trucks were full steel cabs.The only wood was a small piece on each side at the bottom of the door where the lower sills got hooked together. .I think 36 1/2 low roof trucks were also all steel?
    Standard model Chevys of the 30's had a beam axle,same as the pu truck.Deluxe models had the independent front suspension that was said to handle worse than a straight axle.Some also say the Ford buggy springs handle better than GM parallel leafs,probably a judgement call though.
    By the late 1940's a Chevy with a GMC 6 was faster than a Flattie V-8 but not many built the GMC engines.The Flathead tradition was strong,ya know,the SBC of it's day.
     
  29. Gotgas
    Joined: Jul 22, 2004
    Posts: 7,252

    Gotgas
    Member
    from DFW USA

    It's 1940 and you want to build a hot rod. In 1940 - this means you want to go FAST.

    You go down to the junkyard and start eyeballing project cars. Are you going to pick up the big heavy Chevy coupe with an inline-6, or the little Ford Roadster with a factory V8? The answer is pretty obvious. At first, almost all gow jobs, jalopies, hot rods, whatever you want to call them, were Fords because of the V8. The roadsters were the obvious choice for speed. The 1932s were desirable because they were stylish, with strong frames, suspension and brake parts interchanged with newer cars, and of course most came with the V8. The same reason they're popular today. Keep in mind, when this hobby started, there weren't a million different directions to go. If you had money, you already had a Cord, Auburn, etc. If you were poor, you made do with what was cheap and plentiful.

    No one ever bothered to hot rod the early Chevys because they were inline-6 powered, had ugly parallel leaf suspensions and bulky frames, and were considered cheap old man cars. :)
     
  30. rtomss
    Joined: Jan 9, 2009
    Posts: 242

    rtomss
    Member

    Will do....I sent you a contact request. I'll definitely be at the Cheaterama!!
     

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.