Register now to get rid of these ads!

Jimmy sixes? GMC hotrod 6 cylinders? info?

Discussion in 'The Hokey Ass Message Board' started by bava17, Dec 15, 2005.

  1. bava17
    Joined: Oct 26, 2005
    Posts: 231

    bava17
    Member

    Does anyone know of some good websites/books or whatever that have information on the old GMC motors that were heavily used in old hotrods.
    years? c.i.'s? parts?
    what did they originally come in?
    what should i be lookin for?
    pics?

    didn't they originally come in the big GMC trucks?

    Thanks in advance for the help.
    sb
     
  2. squirrel
    Joined: Sep 23, 2004
    Posts: 60,042

    squirrel
    Member

  3. Hellfish
    Joined: Jun 19, 2002
    Posts: 6,816

    Hellfish
    Member

    GMC or Chevy?
    I know Chevy 216, 235 and 261 inline 6s were used a lot in rods.
    There are 2 reprint books (circa 1953) available on hopping them up. One is by Roger Huntington and one by California Bill. There is also a book by Leo Santucci that covers them in much greater detail, but is more focused on the later 250 and 292 6s, but he states that much of the info is transferable to the earlier 216/235

    So far as websites go...
    inliners.org
    stoveboltengineco.com
    cliffordsperformance.com
    stovebolt.com

    Patricks Antique Truck parts (can't recall the url)
     
  4. squirrel
    Joined: Sep 23, 2004
    Posts: 60,042

    squirrel
    Member

    I haven't found anything in that book pertinent to the stovebolt or jimmy engines.
     
  5. Wild Turkey
    Joined: Oct 17, 2005
    Posts: 903

    Wild Turkey
    Member

    http://www.stovebolt.com/


    there's a few sites on the web -- search for "old trucks" or "GMC trucks"

    I drove a '56 GMC with a big ole six. ****er would climb a tree, but don't get in a hurry.

    Brother knocked the muffler off one day -- had to stick my head out the window to drive it home without getting all my fillings shook loose!
     
  6. Mutt
    Joined: Feb 6, 2003
    Posts: 3,218

    Mutt
    Member


    The 270 was used in big trucks also. I pulled a 270 out of a '53 (?) dump truck that was being crushed. I'd hoped it was a 302, but twern't.


    Mutt
     
  7. TagMan
    Joined: Dec 12, 2002
    Posts: 6,367

    TagMan
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    Try to find a copy of................

    [​IMG]
     
  8. squirrel
    Joined: Sep 23, 2004
    Posts: 60,042

    squirrel
    Member

    yup, but you aren't likely to find a 302 stock in a pickup.
     
  9. HEATHEN
    Joined: Nov 22, 2005
    Posts: 9,060

    HEATHEN
    Member
    from SIDNEY, NY


    Keep in mind that GMC made it easy on someone pawing through a pile of engines, fifty years after the fact. There are no codes to remember, because they simply stamped the engine size (228,248,270,302) on the machined pad near the distributor hole. I yanked my 302 out of a '57 school bus, but a lot of guys find theirs in an old army 6X6.
     
  10. Bluto
    Joined: Feb 15, 2005
    Posts: 5,113

    Bluto
    Member Emeritus

    Get ready for ''LONG MOTOR ENVY''

    Even with the 228 in my 39 I never found a 235 I couldn't blow the doors offa!

    I'm pretty sure that next will be a 300+ year for GMCs at B'ville
     
  11. Pactrics do a lot of stuff for the old GMC motor.

    Also try www.oldgmc.com

    I bought a good book a few years ago on chevy and gmc sixes I think I got it from hotrod and custom supply, not sure of their web site.
     
  12. buffaloracer
    Joined: Aug 22, 2004
    Posts: 823

    buffaloracer
    Member
    from kansas

  13. 302GMC
    Joined: Dec 15, 2005
    Posts: 8,514

    302GMC
    Member
    from Idaho

    NFG here...
    These are the Ronnie Self of hot rod motors. For a too brief period around 1952-5, they held a bunch of records in any auto sport that matters. This is unfortunate timing, as it coincides with racers figuring out how to make the Chryslers, Oldsmobiles, and Cadillacs run right, then the Chevy V8 just about ended it all.
    Car Craft had a cover article in 1955 on a sports car built by a rodder using a 320" Wayne 12 port pulling 520 HP on a dyno...Hilborns on pop, Herbert roller,Vertex,Chrysler full flow filter.
    They bolt into anything Chevrolet ever built if you know what pieces go where. Most of the bolt ons from the Chevy fit. Bellhousings from Chevy 6 through 1962 fit. Flywheels (GMC only) are getting hard to find, at least up here. Look for them in wraparound windshield big trucks so you'll get a newer 270 or 302. First 3 digits in serial # on pad beside dist. is displacement - if it doesn't say 270 or 302, you probably don't want it. Look for 5 freeze plugs on manifold side, and a lot of bolts in the side plate - a lot of these trucks got Chevy 6s stuck in them when the farmer couldn't afford to fix the GMC. In the older engines (pre '55), the crank has a 4 bolt flywheel flange that'll give you problems if you wind it up a lot. Most 302 builders use a 270 crank - much lighter. A few years ago, one builder was using 248 cranks in 302 blocks and getting some terrific results. If possible, pull the side plate to check for freeze cracks before you buy a block - these things crack at 34 degrees. '56 up rods have bigger wrist pins. Stock oiling works well with full flow filter conversion posted on Inliners International site (join them,well worth it). 1/8" overbore is standard practice on either block, gives 292" or 320''. '50-'51 270 "H" and 302 cylinder heads have big intake ports, Chevy Fenton headers work if you port match them. Delco HEI distributor fits with a gear change and some machine work. Balancing is the best money you'll ever spend. 9 to 1 compression will work on the street. Any good cam grinder can regrind a street cam, bearing in mind this is a torque engine, not extreme high RPM. The intakes are getting scarce.
    Bear in mind, none of your Ford flathead friends are going to want much to do with you after you build an engine worth 150 more horses for less money than they spent on their heads and manifold.
     
  14. BIG PORT JIMMY 6
    Joined: Dec 7, 2004
    Posts: 333

    BIG PORT JIMMY 6
    Member

    The only thing I can add to what 302gmc said is that the 56 up civilian motors are better. The military blocks are the same as the 52 - 55. One of the parts books that I ws looking at seemmed to suggest that the late fifties pontiac fly wheel would fit the six bolt GMC. This seems to make sense, since the poncho bent eights were available in the Task Force GMCS. Jay
     
  15. Bluto
    Joined: Feb 15, 2005
    Posts: 5,113

    Bluto
    Member Emeritus

    Some long motors

    Nicson equiped 228 in my 39 AC102

    The moc-up motor is in my chopped 40 Ford

    Some guys race motor :D
     

    Attached Files:

  16. billjharris
    Joined: Oct 7, 2005
    Posts: 862

    billjharris
    Member

    the BIG reason for the GMC being the preferred engine for 6 cylinder projects is that the oiling system is far superior to the babbitt rod type engines chevy used in their vehicles prior to the powerglide 53's, when the 235 came into usage A chevy is just as good as a GMC.
     
  17. OldSub
    Joined: Aug 27, 2003
    Posts: 1,063

    OldSub
    Member Emeritus

    Two things to add:

    1) It's not oldgmc.com, but oldgmctrucks.com that you want to check. Lots of info about GMC motors and people who know about them in the forums.

    2) GMC used a better alloy in casting the motors, which along with better oiling is another reason they were better than the Chevy motors.

    And Stovebolt.com is a good place for both Chevy and GMC six information.
     
  18. grittygrease
    Joined: Feb 19, 2005
    Posts: 2

    grittygrease
    Member

    Hey, a good website for information on the old gmc sixes is oldgmctrucks.com. Ive got a 270 inliner in my 56 gmc its pretty strong runner for a 6 and gets about 20 miles per gal. The old dirt track guys used the 270 and the 302 in thier cars. Good luck.
     
  19. BIG PORT JIMMY 6
    Joined: Dec 7, 2004
    Posts: 333

    BIG PORT JIMMY 6
    Member

    Spoken like a man with a 235. Jimmy cylinder heads breathe much better than a stovebolt. Jay
     
  20. jrlaw
    Joined: Sep 3, 2009
    Posts: 1

    jrlaw
    Member
    from Houston

    Ditto. I have a running 57 GMC and would like to start adding some performance gear. Would like to start with intake & exhaust manifolds. I'm having trouble finding 270 CI stuff. Lots of wimpy 235 stuff out there but it won't fit a real engine.
     
  21. panic
    Joined: Jan 3, 2004
    Posts: 1,450

    panic

    much of the info is transferable to the earlier 216/235

    Nothing from the later engine fits except the distributor, the engines aren't related.
     
  22. panic
    Joined: Jan 3, 2004
    Posts: 1,450

    panic

    A chevy is just as good as a GMC

    GMC advantages:
    1. much stronger rods
    2. maximum displacement much larger
    3. stock "H" heads have much bigger intake ports
    4. compression can be raised without welding etc.
     
  23. Hudsonator
    Joined: Jun 19, 2005
    Posts: 335

    Hudsonator
    Member
    from Tennessee

    I've heard that a set of Hudson rods can do wonders for the Jimmy too.

    All of us inline afficiandos need to get our **** in order and build HA/GR cars.

    I know very little about these engines, but I'm subscribing to this thread just to spy on ya.

    Hud
     
    Frankie47 likes this.
  24. Limey Steve
    Joined: Apr 4, 2005
    Posts: 1,522

    Limey Steve
    Alliance Vendor
    from Whittier

    FYI I have a low mile Millitary GMC complete engine valve cover to oil pan with no manifolds spotlessly clean $1500 obo if anyone is interested.

    Cheers
     
  25. panic
    Joined: Jan 3, 2004
    Posts: 1,450

    panic

    a set of Hudson rods

    1. permits slight stroke increase by offset grinding the rod journals: GMC is 2.311", Hudson 2.125" so maximum increase is .186" (typically subtract .005" to clean up the old journal), or about 4.65% increase on a 270 or 302 - not much.
    2. the Hudson rod is waayyy longer, which allows a much shorter and lighter piston (no other way to do this since the block is very tall).
    3. the 302 deck height IIRC is 11.281"(?), so the new piston's compression distance with this stroke and Hudson rod is 1.073", rod ratio 1.939:1.
     
  26. mtkawboy
    Joined: Feb 12, 2007
    Posts: 1,213

    mtkawboy
    Member

    If you want the older engine the GMC is fine but for power the later 292 Chevy truck engine has a lot more stuff available for it and will really run. Ive had really good luck with 300 Ford 6s years back in drag cars too.
     
  27. kevinc
    Joined: Jul 6, 2008
    Posts: 95

    kevinc
    Member
    from highland

    ive seen split manifolds and the howard 5 carb intake for jimmys still in production, does anyone know if there is any one still making things like valve covers, side covers, or any other speed parts for them. ive got a 270 with a t-5 behind it in my 59,
     
  28. Kevinc, what clutch setup did you use? I'm about to put a t5 behind my 270 as well. thanks
     
  29. JRB5155
    Joined: Jun 12, 2012
    Posts: 2

    JRB5155
    Member
    from Burlington

    Look at installing a 1974 Camaro clutch in this ride. I re drilled the holes hole for the new pressure plate.
     
  30. Bearing Burner
    Joined: Mar 2, 2009
    Posts: 1,208

    Bearing Burner
    Member
    from W. MA

    Lot of speed equipment being manufactured for GMC sixes. Check Inliners International and their 12 Port News.
     

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.