Register now to get rid of these ads!

283 block 265 cubes ?

Discussion in 'The Hokey Ass Message Board' started by rust runner, Nov 10, 2009.

  1. this has had me wondering for a couple of years now and figured the chevy engine pros on here could give me some insight. bought an engine that came out of a 57 cameo p/u and was told that it was a 265. my buddy that builds engines was going to put ring in for me. looked at the casting number on the back and it was 3731548. my book says that it was a 57 283 block. we figured it was a 283 and not a 265. we had already pulled pistons out and were 30 over. i assumed ( yes i know the saying and its true.) 283 because of the numbers and got the rings. they were way big. ordered 265 rings and were right. none of the books i have list a 265 with that block number. have i missed something somewhere?thanks in advance.
    bruce
     
  2. according to Mortec that block could have been a 265 or a 283. i have always been told the first 283s in 1957 were bored out 265s

    http://www.mortec.com/castnum.htm
     
  3. Big Block Bill
    Joined: May 14, 2009
    Posts: 300

    Big Block Bill
    Member


    You are talking 18 cu in difference, that's big, and your piston says .030. I never heard of taking a 265 .125 over or more to get your 283. Measure the bore, take the guesswork out of it.........good luck
     
  4. coupster
    Joined: May 9, 2006
    Posts: 860

    coupster
    Member
    from Oscoda Mi

    265= 3.75x3 283= 3.875x3
     
  5. lowride
    Joined: Oct 12, 2005
    Posts: 198

    lowride
    Member

    The 57 265 blocks were 283 blocks but only had a 2 3/4" bore and same stroke as the 283 (3.00")
     

  6. what i was meaning by my comment was he probably has a 265 that was bored .030 sometime in the past. that block could have been a 265 or a 283 from the factory. and yes , you can bore a 265 1/8" to 283...chevy did

    i agree.....measure the bore accurately to see what it actually is
     
  7. Shaggy
    Joined: Mar 6, 2003
    Posts: 5,207

    Shaggy
    Member
    from Sultan, WA

    They did a lot in the late 50's, it was possable, back then ford and GM made motors with a LOT of meat think flathead....
     
  8. holeshot
    Joined: Sep 18, 2009
    Posts: 1,519

    holeshot
    BANNED
    from Waxahachie

    hey RUSTY...if you know the engine was bored 30 over. how can 265 rings fit the pistons? unless your ordered 30 over for a 265 engine. which means you solved your own question! call me POP...or the old FART!
     
  9. Big Block Bill
    Joined: May 14, 2009
    Posts: 300

    Big Block Bill
    Member

    I learned something. I thought I new my motors, at least chevy, but it seems I learned something new..... a 265 + .125 over = 283. Never too old to learn, and not too proud to admit I was wrong.thanks.......
     
    Last edited: Nov 11, 2009
  10. BELLM
    Joined: Nov 16, 2002
    Posts: 2,590

    BELLM
    Member

    I've got a '56 265 bored to 283 in my shop, was first in a t bucket in the early '60s. Popups, ported power pak heads, one of my treasures.
     

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.