Register now to get rid of these ads!

Airride Straight axle info from WORM

Discussion in 'The Hokey Ass Message Board' started by WORM, Nov 5, 2004.

  1. WORM
    Joined: Apr 1, 2001
    Posts: 51

    WORM
    Member

    Hi all, great to see the interest on the HAMB regarding our straight axle airride set up. We have been working on it for the last 2 years and debuted it at the NSRA Nats where we came home with the best new product of the year. Anyhow, just wanted to let you guys know that I would be happy to help anyone out with installation ideas are tech info. The crossmember is pretty different from a stock or A-style aftermarket one due to the need for bag clearance and swingarm set up. The spring is replaced with 2 swingarms that pivot near the center with the bags located outboard as far as possible. The bags have a combined weight rating of 1600 lbs, which is plenty for the sprung weight of a early car or truck. Ride height adjustment is over 5 1/2" with the bag height engineered into the crossmember for optimal bag extension at ride height. We are currently finishing a second airride set up for 37-40 Fords. Should be done in the next month and it will have heavier bags to take the extra weight of the fat fendered cars. Let me know if you have any questions... Regards-WORM
     
  2. Nice to see you here again Worm!
     
  3. WORM
    Joined: Apr 1, 2001
    Posts: 51

    WORM
    Member

    Hey Tman, we have been swamped..Just finished new truck axles and have been selling like gang busters. Then this airride deal took off and put me behind. I lurk every other nite or so, but don't get much time to post. Just finished up a tech article which took me the better part of 2 weeks of photos, layout ...etc. Thought it would be no big deal, but it kicked my*****. Doesnt help I'm a pecker when it comes to typing. Regards-WORM
     
  4. junk runner jr
    Joined: Dec 21, 2001
    Posts: 456

    junk runner jr
    Member

    So your saying that the bags are not acctualy mounted to the axel but to a lever of sorts that pivots in the center and attaches with a shackel out at the stock spring mounting location? That would cure my concern of instability in corners. I guess I did not look at the pic close enough.
     
  5. WORM
    Joined: Apr 1, 2001
    Posts: 51

    WORM
    Member

    Exactly, the set up looks like a traditional front end when the bags are down. The swingarms are machined to look like the end of a leaf spring. Someone would have to look for the two center bolts on the crossmember or see the front end up....let me know if you have any questions-WORM
     
  6. ray
    Joined: Jun 25, 2001
    Posts: 3,798

    ray
    Member
    from colorado

    hey that looks pretty cool! i don't know about your switch mounting location though. [​IMG] must be made for trailer queens? [​IMG]
     
  7. BigDdy31
    Joined: Jul 31, 2002
    Posts: 1,003

    BigDdy31
    Member

    THAT'S a very cool design dude. No wonder you won the award. Lookin' at it makes me wish I need one, just so I could see it in action. lol

     
  8. KnuckleDragger
    Joined: Aug 21, 2004
    Posts: 536

    KnuckleDragger
    Member

    That is a really cool design, I will have to keep that in mind when I start building a rod..

    Jonney
     
  9. Blownolds
    Joined: Mar 31, 2001
    Posts: 2,335

    Blownolds
    Member
    from So Cal

    Got a photo somewhere?
     
  10. Phil1934
    Joined: Jun 24, 2001
    Posts: 2,716

    Phil1934
    Member

    Assembled
     

    Attached Files:

  11. Phil1934
    Joined: Jun 24, 2001
    Posts: 2,716

    Phil1934
    Member

    Components
     

    Attached Files:

  12. beatnik
    Joined: Nov 8, 2002
    Posts: 2,209

    beatnik
    Member

    Here's a couple of pics I took at the Nats this year. Looked very cool for a fenderless rod.
     
  13. beatnik
    Joined: Nov 8, 2002
    Posts: 2,209

    beatnik
    Member

  14. Blownolds
    Joined: Mar 31, 2001
    Posts: 2,335

    Blownolds
    Member
    from So Cal

    Wait a minute--- does that air bag go between the crossmember and the SPRING?
     
  15. fab32
    Joined: May 14, 2002
    Posts: 13,985

    fab32
    Member Emeritus

    Doesn't look like a spring, sort of a locator arm. At a quick glance you would mistake it for a spring. Cool idea. Let's see, The SBC is 50 years old and a lot of folks here don't consider it traditional, so I'm guessing about 2060 this thing should be making it's mark in the TRADITIONAL hot rod field. [​IMG]
     
  16. Mojo
    Joined: Jul 23, 2002
    Posts: 1,875

    Mojo
    Member

    Very slick, I like the idea a lot, great concept.
     
  17. Im thinkin what Im seein is a 48 ford style setup right?Is it available for a 32-34 and if so where is the radiator bolted on that application- to a welded nut on top of crossmember above bag mount?
    Also why is the crossmember "taller/thicker" at the front view-is it to conceal componentry I am not seeing?
    How much does it lower the car if it HAD a dropped axle and spring and then was switched to your set up?
     
  18. WORM
    Joined: Apr 1, 2001
    Posts: 51

    WORM
    Member

    32 Style uses a stud on top of crossmember, 33-34 style uses a mount in front of crossmember. Yes it is a little thicker??? to conceal the bags. At first glance it looks an awful lot like a 32-34 crossmember when mounted in the car. With the car at "normal ride height" as in most straight axle cars, you get a full 2 3/4" drop or use of the shock. The real benfit to the whole system is that the car has that much ride travel....85-90% of straight axle cars are built inproper with only 1-1 1/2" of down travel. Most guys think straight axle cars ride rough, when in reality they are feeling the shock bottom out from a poorly designed front suspension...made that way to sit low. We spent almost two years doing CAD designs to get the best ride (ie ride travel) we could get. The other benefit from our design is that the bags were not just thrown into a crossmember. We started with the bag compressed at ride height, and built the crossmember and swingarms around them. Sorry for rambling...just wanted to give alittle more info. Regards-WORM
     
  19. Blownolds
    Joined: Mar 31, 2001
    Posts: 2,335

    Blownolds
    Member
    from So Cal

    'Nuther question-- what is that axle? Looks kind of neat.

    And yet another one--- what are your honest feelings about using that setup in a relatively heavy '40 (no hood, aluminum radiator, BUT with a very heavy blown 394 Olds and Hydro*******), launching the front off the ground by two feet and coming back down???
     
  20. Phil1934
    Joined: Jun 24, 2001
    Posts: 2,716

    Phil1934
    Member

    You need to scroll around on the site tagged at the bottom of Worm's responses. That's their CNC SS axle, another Best Product of the Year. http://www.cenpen.com/axles.htm
     
  21. WORM
    Joined: Apr 1, 2001
    Posts: 51

    WORM
    Member

    Axle is our Precision machined axle.... We are currently working on a 37-40 front end that will have heavier bags in it.....I would say that one would be the one you are looking for-WORM
     
  22. Blownolds
    Joined: Mar 31, 2001
    Posts: 2,335

    Blownolds
    Member
    from So Cal

    Cool, I look forward to it.

    What would you say the overall total weight savings would be with this setup from stock?
     
  23. WORM
    Joined: Apr 1, 2001
    Posts: 51

    WORM
    Member

    I doubt there would be any weight savings at all...The ride would be greatly improved though...-WORM
     
  24. Blownolds
    Joined: Mar 31, 2001
    Posts: 2,335

    Blownolds
    Member
    from So Cal

    Just revisiting this a bit. Worm, if you are looking at this topic, could you tell us if a panhard or lateral locating bar is still recommended with this setup?

    Also-- the locating bars/springs in the photo of the kit components looks flat, more like a strap, but the bars in the photo of the installed kit on the suspension look very thick. What am I looking at?
     
  25. Boones
    Joined: Mar 4, 2001
    Posts: 9,689

    Boones
    Member
    from Kent, Wa

    Can this set up be used in a model A frame?
     
  26. WORM
    Joined: Apr 1, 2001
    Posts: 51

    WORM
    Member

    Panhard bars always will tighten up a straight axle front, so yes for better handling, I would use one-Regards, WORM
     
  27. WORM
    Joined: Apr 1, 2001
    Posts: 51

    WORM
    Member

    Yes, It is made for Model A through 34 Ford, but can be adapted to almost any early model frame-WORM
     
  28. AHotRod
    Joined: Jul 27, 2001
    Posts: 12,318

    AHotRod
    Member

    Up from the Past,........WORM ! Where are you brother ????

    Glenn
     
  29. InDaShop
    Joined: Aug 15, 2004
    Posts: 2,796

    InDaShop
    Member
    from Houston

    Last Activity: 01-22-2006 08:53 PM
     
  30. Roadsters.com
    Joined: Apr 9, 2002
    Posts: 1,782

    Roadsters.com
    Member

    Last Activity: 06-03-2006 04:16 PM
     

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.