Register now to get rid of these ads!

Dual carbs. on a flathead

Discussion in 'The Hokey Ass Message Board' started by firerod, Nov 20, 2009.

  1. firerod
    Joined: Jan 20, 2008
    Posts: 572

    firerod
    Member
    from Colorado

    Anyone know if dual 94's or 81's would work better on a stock flathead at 5000 feet elevation? Or 97's?
     
  2. Terry O
    Joined: Oct 12, 2004
    Posts: 1,060

    Terry O
    Member

    I would guess the 97's simply because the 94's use a vacuum operated power valve. I would think as air density decreases that it may alter operation of the circuit.....but really I could simply be full of it.

    Terry
     
  3. Bruce Lancaster
    Joined: Oct 9, 2001
    Posts: 21,681

    Bruce Lancaster
    Member Emeritus

    I agree that al***ude would likely lower vac level and so require a smaller# power valve on a 94 or 92 (the 60 version). I too would dodge the issue and go to 97 or 81...

    Some Ford stuff, from the bulletins. Ford offered 5,000 and 10,000 foot carbs in most models, na Ford Canada also had a "Nairobi" carb for export to the highlands. Haven't looked up al***ude there. Jet sizes are listed sea level--5,000--10,000

    Stromberg 52 (.81) 035-033-031
    Stromberg 67 (.97) 045-043-041
    Ford 59 (.94) 051-049-047
    Ford 922 (.81) 035-033-031
     
  4. johnny bondo
    Joined: Aug 20, 2005
    Posts: 1,547

    johnny bondo
    Member
    from illinois

    i dont think it would effect it much? because its not a contained vacuum. its not an air tank that would loose pressure, the engine creates its own vacuum. its open to the air and is only regulated through the carbs suction. its constantly making new vacuum, maybe just need more throttle? if that makes sense??.... maybe not? erm it makes sense in my head....
     
  5. Bruce Lancaster
    Joined: Oct 9, 2001
    Posts: 21,681

    Bruce Lancaster
    Member Emeritus

    Thinking about vacuum hurts my head...let's see, divide by zero, carry the "H"...
    I'm thinking the engines is ****ing in the same cubage of air, but there's less air in that volume...then what?? Send out for coffee!
    The small jets are to compensate for less air in the air, of couse...but do they also compensate for a hypotheticl drop in venturi signal from thinner air, or is there any such thing?
    Easiest thing would be to move downhill, I think!
     
  6. flatheadjunk
    Joined: Nov 10, 2006
    Posts: 288

    flatheadjunk
    Member Emeritus
    from Orange CA

    For what it's worth, 81's really work best on a mild flatmotor.As mentioned, 94's use a vacuum actuated power valve ( like a late Holley ) and can be harder to tune.Add the fact that most of the available parts for the 94's are questionable and you really have a nightmare.I only offer this advice based on many years of rebuilding carbs and tuning flatheads.You have some great help here on the HAMB so don't be afraid to ask if you need it.Good luck !
     
  7. Bruce Lancaster
    Joined: Oct 9, 2001
    Posts: 21,681

    Bruce Lancaster
    Member Emeritus

    I really hope the Edelbrock initiative leads to decent rebuild kits...I don't need any new carbs!
     
  8. Flat Ernie
    Joined: Jun 5, 2002
    Posts: 8,406

    Flat Ernie
    Tech Editor

    Vacuum is down significantly at al***ude - I just moved from 7000' and 15" was about normal, where before I had 19" or so at sea level.

    I've found the 81s need to be jetted up a bit from stock to work on the bigger flathead - even in duals. For a 97, I found 42 jets and #69 power valves to work well.
     
  9. Mike51Merc
    Joined: Dec 5, 2008
    Posts: 3,855

    Mike51Merc
    Member

    Oxygen content goes down at al***ude. Sure, there's still "air" there and the CFMs are still CFMs, but the oxygen content necessary for fuel to burn. The "air" is thinner, so you need more of it to get the same amount of combustion. Since the CFM's are fixed by the engine displacement, p***ages, and carbs (so you cannot increase them) the only thing to do is provide less fuel (leaner) to get back to the optimal combustion mixture.

    The other added solution is to increase compression, so that the fewer oxygen molecules get squished together into the came concentration as they would have at normal al***udes.
     
  10. holeshot
    Joined: Sep 18, 2009
    Posts: 1,519

    holeshot
    BANNED
    from Waxahachie

    hey FIREROD...TERRY was right about the va***e, va***e operated just means amount of fuel that can p*** at sea level. go higher elivation and tha air is thiner, therefor you draw less fuel. terry you just might be a genious NAA maby not! HA! call me POP...or the old FART!
     
  11. johnny bondo
    Joined: Aug 20, 2005
    Posts: 1,547

    johnny bondo
    Member
    from illinois

    so..... the amount of fuel that needs to go into the motor needs to be more on high alt? but the air is less, but you need more air to p*** over the vaporizers to get more fuel..... but then you might have to much fuel going in to fast? so you lean the carbs out? which in turn defeats the purpose of bigger jets????
    kjsdnfkjsdf:confused::confused::confused::confused::confused::confused:
     
  12. Bruce Lancaster
    Joined: Oct 9, 2001
    Posts: 21,681

    Bruce Lancaster
    Member Emeritus

    You use smaller jets, leaning the mix, at high al***ude. Carb venturis meter fuel by the v0lume of air going through the venturi...but a given volume of air contains less actual air, so smaller jets meter less fuel to maintain proper ratio between air and fuel. This is expressed in terms of air volume, though the oxygen fraction of the air is actually what is of interest here.
     
  13. Adam F
    Joined: Jun 19, 2001
    Posts: 323

    Adam F
    Member

    Hey all,

    On the Ford flathead techno site are a series of flathead articles by "rumbleseat". He has a vast knowledge and is located in Colorado so I think he has covered the topic of tuning dual carbs at at altiude before- might be worth a look:http://www.btc-bci.com/~billben/flathead.htm
     
  14. Screamin' Metal
    Joined: Feb 1, 2009
    Posts: 506

    Screamin' Metal
    Member
    from Oklahoma

    97's......lean her out some and reset your timing........
     
  15. 214Gearjammer
    Joined: Jan 22, 2009
    Posts: 181

    214Gearjammer
    Member
    from Dallas, TX

    Great Link, Adam--thanks!
     
  16. johnny bondo
    Joined: Aug 20, 2005
    Posts: 1,547

    johnny bondo
    Member
    from illinois

    *just got schooled. thanks!:D
     
  17. firerod
    Joined: Jan 20, 2008
    Posts: 572

    firerod
    Member
    from Colorado

    Wow, thanks for the great response. Can always count on the HAMB.
     
  18. uncle max
    Joined: Jan 19, 2006
    Posts: 908

    uncle max
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    If I'm not mistaken, I think there's a guy in Nebraska selling Nairobi carbs. . .
     
  19. uncle max
    Joined: Jan 19, 2006
    Posts: 908

    uncle max
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    Your posts always make me hungry. I'm going out for a Double Ego Burger. . . With bacon & cheese.
     
  20. strombergs97
    Joined: May 22, 2006
    Posts: 1,888

    strombergs97
    Member
    from California

    On a stock Flathead I think 81s are the best. I would run them with .045 jets with jet adjusters, you can really dial them in and stock power valve.
    Air, who drives at one al***ude, find the happy medium. Thinner air, less fuel, thicker air more fuel..Easy formula !!!!!!!!!!!
    Duane..
    max, I'm getting a veggie burger with less vacuum and thicker air..that should fill me up..
     
    Hunterbynature likes this.

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.