Register now to get rid of these ads!

GT-40 P Heads.

Discussion in 'The Hokey Ass Message Board' started by PunkAssGearhead88, Jan 8, 2010.

  1. PunkAssGearhead88
    Joined: Jul 9, 2006
    Posts: 1,791

    PunkAssGearhead88
    Member
    from So Cal

    I did a search but still have some questions..
    Im thinking about getting a pair of GT 40 P heads.
    As far as bolting these to a carburated 70's 351 W block, what would need to be changed / modified?
    Also would running Hi-Po valve springs be a problem with a stock/mild cam?
     
  2. Go to corral.net and check the windsor section.
     
  3. josh_m
    Joined: Nov 21, 2009
    Posts: 13

    josh_m
    Member

    the "P" heads use a 7/16" head bolt where the 351w uses 1/2" head bolt

    your better off looking for a set of gt40's from a first gen lightning which have the 351w
     
  4. Domino
    Joined: Jul 2, 2009
    Posts: 529

    Domino
    Member

    The P heads were used on the Explorers in the late 90s. They have a different angle to the spark plug and tend to have header to spark plug clearance problems when used in non stock applications. They also use a plug with a longer reach. They are pretty good heads. It is not uncommon to drill the head bolt holes out to accommodate the bigger bolts. Any machine shop can do it, but most people do it themselves.
     
  5. PunkAssGearhead88
    Joined: Jul 9, 2006
    Posts: 1,791

    PunkAssGearhead88
    Member
    from So Cal

    Im not too worried about the spark plug and header issues.. So besides the head bolts whats else do I have to look out for? What about push rods? Intake?
     
  6. calvinh
    Joined: Aug 31, 2009
    Posts: 176

    calvinh
    Member

    Pushrods, intake, etc. are all the same. They are really good heads for a production head. Even for fuel injected applications the GT 40 "p" intake is essentially a Cobra without the EGR plate built in. I have had a lot of Mustangs and built quite a few for others and using these heads are a real bang for the buck.
     
  7. PunkAssGearhead88
    Joined: Jul 9, 2006
    Posts: 1,791

    PunkAssGearhead88
    Member
    from So Cal

    Great thanks to all the info. from everyone so far..
     
  8. calvinh
    Joined: Aug 31, 2009
    Posts: 176

    calvinh
    Member

    Hey Punk***, wanna sell that '57 F-1?
     
  9. desertdroog
    Joined: Nov 16, 2001
    Posts: 1,022

    desertdroog
    Member

    I have stock heads on my 351W. Is this a worthy upgrade if I come across either a GT-40 or GT-40P heads in the junkyard?
     
  10. PunkAssGearhead88
    Joined: Jul 9, 2006
    Posts: 1,791

    PunkAssGearhead88
    Member
    from So Cal

    Not really,.. but anything is for sale for the right price..
     
  11. PunkAssGearhead88
    Joined: Jul 9, 2006
    Posts: 1,791

    PunkAssGearhead88
    Member
    from So Cal

    If you have a 69-70 Windsor then NO, It would actually be a downgrade, the 69-70 Windsor heads actually have bigger valves if im not mistaking, flow just as well and have smaller CC's wich means higher compression...
    If you have a later Windsor (like me) then YES!
     
    Last edited: Jan 9, 2010
  12. josh_m
    Joined: Nov 21, 2009
    Posts: 13

    josh_m
    Member

    p heads have a 1.84 int valve and a 1.5 exh valve and have 62cc-64cc seen them both

    the spring retainers are different from the int and exh valves.

    i had a trick flow valve spring kit installed on a set and my machine shop guy said they went together good.
     
  13. desertdroog
    Joined: Nov 16, 2001
    Posts: 1,022

    desertdroog
    Member

    Ah I figured as much. I am running a 1970 block/heads.
     

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.