Register now to get rid of these ads!

Small block mopar Pistons?

Discussion in 'The Hokey Ass Message Board' started by bigroy, Jan 13, 2010.

  1. bigroy
    Joined: Nov 25, 2009
    Posts: 159

    bigroy
    Member

    Ok this might be a stupid question I recently read in a power block online magazine that the 318-360 Mopars used the same stroke and bore and got the different displacements by changing the height of the pistons ( no clue what thats means I think they mean the wrist pin). Anyone know what the hell this all means? also i have a 318 that if thats all true i want to put a set of 340 or 360 pistons into it, so if theres any one that has ever tried it I appreciate your input.
     
  2. moparforlife
    Joined: Feb 21, 2009
    Posts: 351

    moparforlife
    Member
    from Rolla, MO

    Wrong. 318 bore and stroke is 3.91 x 3.31. 340 bore and stroke is 4.04 x 3.31. 360 bore and stroke is 4 x 3.58.
     
  3. AllSteel36
    Joined: Jul 20, 2009
    Posts: 560

    AllSteel36
    Member
    from California

    Don't know what it means, but cannot occur as you've stated it.
     
  4. Ratfink749
    Joined: Nov 16, 2008
    Posts: 89

    Ratfink749
    Member

    And if your feeling really peppy, 4.03" bore 4" stroke will give you a 408. (Stroker crank in a .030" over 360 block) From expierence I can tell you, they are torque monsters! Changing pistons without changing the bore and stroke will really only affect your compression ratio, theyre still going up and down the same ammount, in a hole of the same size. Volume displaced wont change one bit. It will only be compressed more or less.
     
  5. bigroy
    Joined: Nov 25, 2009
    Posts: 159

    bigroy
    Member

    OK thanks guys i had my doubts about this, but thought id see if there was any truth to it.
     
  6. The Shocker
    Joined: Dec 30, 2004
    Posts: 3,538

    The Shocker
    Member

    "Torque Monsters" is an under statement .The 408 in my Dart is a freaking animal to be a 10 to 1 ,hyd. cam , motor .Someone hit the nail on the head when they came up with the idea to make a stroker crank for these LA motors ...
     
  7. WE do them 380 inch . 3.6 stroke 4.1 bore on a 340 block. Tire fryer.
     
  8. George
    Joined: Jan 1, 2005
    Posts: 8,000

    George
    Member

    273/318/340 have the same stroke. 360s are scarce in Australia so they cut the mains on a 360 crank & put em in 318s to get 349s.
     
  9. moparforlife
    Joined: Feb 21, 2009
    Posts: 351

    moparforlife
    Member
    from Rolla, MO

    Or you could go with a .030 over 318 and a 4 inch crank and come out at 390.
     
  10. Yes you can but when the stroke is a great as or greater than the bore the engine develops different charcteristics. Ideally when stoke is 90% of bore everything works the best. that is where i like to be . Piston speed is lower in feet per second so engine has a bit more safety factor. HP is not much different as the heads really control that. Besides I was doing these before Mopar made the 4 inch stroke. In fact i was receiving a verbal whipping (behind my back)From R E of Mopar Action right at the very week the 4 inch cranks were introduced. Mopar also at that time intro-ed a small main journal 3.58 stroke crank. We were reworking a stock 360 crank and then offest grinding the rod journals 020 to get the 3.6 stroke. There we were ahead of the curve again. I have one of the first ones done still.
    Don
     
  11. used 340 pistons in a 360 machined cylinder heads for clearance because the deck height is +.?? lots of compression pulled big time out of the corner.
     
  12. strike a poser
    Joined: May 23, 2007
    Posts: 399

    strike a poser
    Member
    from Salinas,CA

    Sounds like some Mopar knowlageble folks her. I've got a question regaurding the intake and heads on a 273. I've got a '64 Barracuda with a cracked head. I know that the intakes and heads are uniqe to this engine. Are the later parts interchangeable with this short block?
    Am I reading right, the difference between the two is the angle of the intake mating surface, or the angle of the intake mounting bolts? Most info I've found is vauge on this.
    I would like to know what would be my best course of action short of replacing the whole engine.
     
  13. moparforlife
    Joined: Feb 21, 2009
    Posts: 351

    moparforlife
    Member
    from Rolla, MO

    I don't know a whole lot about the early 273's, but I'll just about guarantee somebody over at www.forabodiesonly.com would know the answer. I do believe that you can bolt on the top end from a 318/340/360 though.
     
    Last edited: Jan 13, 2010
  14. moparforlife
    Joined: Feb 21, 2009
    Posts: 351

    moparforlife
    Member
    from Rolla, MO

    Good call. 273 bore is 3.63, 340 bore is 4.04. 2.02 valve is pretty big for that little 273 hole.
     
  15. 69fury
    Joined: Feb 24, 2009
    Posts: 1,738

    69fury
    Member
    from Topeka

    Big time torque monster. My 360 is .060" with 4" stroke (414") mediocre heads, intake, 30 year old design juice cam put out over 500 lb/ft on the first pull before we even ran the timing loop. :eek: got another 20 lb/ft out of it through some tuning. torque peaked at 3800 and graph was flat as western kansas
     
  16. von Dyck
    Joined: Apr 12, 2007
    Posts: 678

    von Dyck
    Member

    Yeh, this is OT, but here it is anyway. Overbored a 300 Ford six - shaved .060 off the tops of six used 340 pistons - honed the pin end of the Ford rods to fit the Dodge pins. Put it all together with a stock cam (that was a mistake - it really needed a cam with a bunch more overlap to soften the increase in compression). Best cold starting engine I ever owned, BUT once it warmed up, 92 octane gas even with 108 boost could not keep the "rattles" away. Why? Why did the bear go over the mountain?

    Here is a Mopar question: has anyone made a 340 out of a 360 by installing a 318 truck crank (using main bearing spacers) and stock bore 340 pistons in a .040" overbore?
     
  17. mart3406
    Joined: May 31, 2009
    Posts: 3,055

    mart3406
    Member
    from Canada

    -------------------------------------
    Wrong. Displacement is determined *solely*
    by the bore and stroke. You can't change
    displacement simply by altering rod length,
    piston height, block deck height. etc.

    And just for information, regarding small
    block Mopars, the bore and stoke for the
    four LA- block sizes are as follows:

    273 - 3.63 bore X 3.31 stroke
    318 - 3.91 bore X 331 stroke
    340 - 4.04 bore X 3.31 stroke
    360 - 4.00 bore X 3.58 stroke

    As far as boring and.or swapping stock pistons
    and cranks a**** these four "similar but
    different" engines to create different sizes,
    there's not much that would be reasonably
    do-able or practical ,at least on a common
    mans budget!, First, even though the 273,
    318 and 340 use a conmon crank with a
    3.31 inch stroke, you can't bore bore a
    273 out to create a 318, nor can you bore
    a 318 out to create a 340.. There's simply
    not enough meat in the cylinder walls
    for this.The only real swap possibility at all
    here to build a bigger engine, using even
    semi-stock parts would be to *possibly* turn
    down the bigger main journals of the 3.58
    stroke 360 crank to a 273-318-340 journal
    size and install that crank into one of these
    engines. But then you'd need high-dollar
    custom pin-height pistons and/or custom
    length rods to make it work Plus the 360
    crank was only available in cast iron, (3.31
    stroke cranks came in both cast iron and
    steel) so. cutting the journals down to the
    smaller 3.31 crank journal size would likely
    weaken it excessively. In the end you'd
    get very little gain for a lot of money in
    custom parts and machine work, when
    you could simply build a 360 with common
    'off-the-t******lf replacement parts.

    Mart3406
    ============================
     
    Last edited: Jan 14, 2010
  18. George
    Joined: Jan 1, 2005
    Posts: 8,000

    George
    Member

    If it's doable some one probably has, but little demand for destroked 360s. On the 300 you obviuosly upped the compression w/o putting in a cam matched to the higher mech comp ratio, or you have some sharp edges on the pistons causing hot spots.
     
  19. If it's online, it must be true . . .:D
     
  20. So what did E-Booger have to say about your ingenious stroker?:confused:
     
  21. mart3406
    Joined: May 31, 2009
    Posts: 3,055

    mart3406
    Member
    from Canada

    ------------------------

    I'm not sure why you'd bother messing with custom bearing spacers and the like, just to end up with 20 fewer cubic inches. Destroking does not make a more powerful engine. It may result in an engine than can theoretlcly rev higher , but as long as the bore size remains the same, you merely end up with an engine that has to rev higher, just to make the same power as an otherwise identcly built, larger displacement, longer stroke engine. Unless you're building a race engine for a cl*** that limits engine size to a particular displacement and destroking is the only way to get down to that size, I don't see any purpose in building
    a destroker, just to lose 20 cubic inches.:eek:

    Mart3406
    ===============================
     
  22. 73RR
    Joined: Jan 29, 2007
    Posts: 7,342

    73RR
    Member


    Your least cost option may be to replace the damaged head. Try these guys: www.wildcatmopars.com

    That being said, you can probably find a complete 360 for the same money.

    .
     
  23. llonning
    Joined: Nov 17, 2007
    Posts: 681

    llonning
    Member


    The early 273 did use 2 types of heads. You are correct on the manifold angle, but they also used 5/16 manifold bolts. You can use the later heads, you just have to match the manifold. Ran into this with a 66 273 years ago.
     
  24. von Dyck
    Joined: Apr 12, 2007
    Posts: 678

    von Dyck
    Member

    In response to George, all sharp edges on the pistons were deburred. The only reason for doing the 340 dodge piston into a 300 Ford 6 was to satisfy the curiosity of "what if?" BTW, I've also adapted 389 Pontiac pistons to the 300 Ford but it was in a racing engine. I've also built up a 300 running 390 Ford V8 flat tops on .050" overbore - it's waiting for a car to put it in and time from me to do the project.

    For Mart3406, there are reasons why some would like a 340 under the hood! The main bearing spacers are $300 - expensive, but so are 340 blocks if you can find a rebuildable. Is big torque and horsepower everything there is in this automotive hobby we on the HAMB all enjoy? Not in every case. Different strokes for different folks......uh, 'nuf said.
     
  25. The Shocker
    Joined: Dec 30, 2004
    Posts: 3,538

    The Shocker
    Member

    As an owner of a stroker 408 im a little biased ,but that still doesnt change the facts.If you want to build a small block Mopar that will make big power and live along time ,build a stroker.Sure a little motor can make big power ,but it will lack the lowend grunt out of the hole over the stroker 408 -414.The stroker will make great power at or below 6000 rpm and allow it to last longer than the smaller motor spinning high to make the same .The way it is now ,it doesnt cost much more to buy a '4 stroker crank kit than to build the smaller 340 - 360 with new stuff ,so why do it ? This is true on any make not just the LA motors . "Theres no replacement for displacement" ...
     
  26. George
    Joined: Jan 1, 2005
    Posts: 8,000

    George
    Member

    Hot Rod Mag. used 340 pistons building a 351M Ford a while back.
     
  27. Damn Straight one day I will build a stroker for my valiant....
     
  28. straight axle tom
    Joined: Nov 10, 2008
    Posts: 22

    straight axle tom
    Member

    the early 273 heads were closed chamber heads with different angles for the intake bolts. you can swap the '67 up 318 heads and intake, but will lose some compression because the 318 heads are open chamber.
     
  29. hell_fish_65
    Joined: Aug 12, 2004
    Posts: 1,165

    hell_fish_65
    Member
    from Elgin TX

    The 302 casting 318 heads(late 80's) are a popular choice. I have them on my 273. Going with later model heads gives you more intake options if you want to go with an aluminum intake. You can even use magnum heads, but the intake options are somewhat limited there.You can shave the heads to bring back the compression, just make sure they do both the block sides and the intake sides. You will have to cap of the smog ports on the 302's, but that is a simple fix.
     
  30. dodgedartgt
    Joined: Dec 25, 2006
    Posts: 96

    dodgedartgt
    Member
    from SW FL

    The '64-65 273 heads/manifold are unique in the manifold to head mounting bolts, being nearly vertical. As stated above, you can use '68/up 318 heads, but they are open chamber and you will loose compression and power.
    The '66/67 273 heads are still closed chamber heads, but with the 90' intake manifold bolt configuration to all other LA engines. Also as stated above, the '302 castings are a very viable option, also closed chamber, and stock flow just a little better than the 273 heads. With either of these heads, you have more intake options than just the little flat single plane intake (2bbl or 4bbl) that is on your early 273. The two that most quiclky come to mind aree the Edelbrock RPM (273/318 sized ports, not the Performer RPM) and the RPM Air Gap, though many more current and older options out there.
    The best stock small block head is the '92/up Magnum head, BUT with anything larger than the 1.78" intake valve common to the 273/318, you WILL NEED to notch the cylinder bore. (360's had 1.88", 340's had 2.02" and 1.88" and Magnums had 1.92" intake valves.) On the other hand, the stock 318 bore will accomodate all these valve sizes.
    Some time back, Steve Dulchic built a 318 with 302 heads ported to 340/360 intake port sizes, with Edelbrock RPM Performer intake, etc... and made over 400hp.
    Last item is the stock iron Magnum heads actually outflow stock Chevy LS1 heads.
    Hope it helps, Mike Bynum
     

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.