Register now to get rid of these ads!

To Posi or not to Posi...that is the question

Discussion in 'The Hokey Ass Message Board' started by RoadRaider, Feb 9, 2010.

  1. RoadRaider
    Joined: Mar 29, 2009
    Posts: 35

    RoadRaider
    Member
    from Nashville

    Alright, I have p***ed another milestone in the "get a drive train for that car" project. I am putting a Chevy 292 l6 into my 51 Chevy Styleline. I just bought a TH 350 ****** for cheap and now I am shopping for a rear end.

    I was thinking that I wanted to put a Posi Track S-10 Rear end under it, but this ol' kat I know semi well busted my balls about that. He said that a posi would just eat up all my HP and that with an engine as small as a 292 i wouldnt get much out of it.

    So Fellas, what do you think? Standard or Posi rear end?
     
  2. squirrel
    Joined: Sep 23, 2004
    Posts: 59,928

    squirrel
    Member

    a posi won't "eat up all your horsepower".

    It would be a tossup for me...probably go non posi unless I found a deal on a good posi rear.
     
  3. mikeco
    Joined: Nov 3, 2008
    Posts: 393

    mikeco
    Member
    from virginia

    I'd say 99% of the time an open rear is just fine. As stated, its a toss up unless you feel better saying ya have a posi.
     
  4. krylon32
    Joined: Jan 29, 2006
    Posts: 10,776

    krylon32
    ALLIANCE MEMBER
    from Nebraska

    In my ch***is business I probably sell one out of eight ch***is with a posi or trac loc. If I ask why, they say because?
     
  5. wingman9
    Joined: Dec 30, 2009
    Posts: 804

    wingman9
    Member
    from left coast

    If you ever drive your car in anything but totally dry conditions I'd say go for the posi. I'm very fond of getting my power to the ground, so everything I own has some kind of traction control.
     
  6. 1930roadster
    Joined: Nov 9, 2009
    Posts: 323

    1930roadster
    Member

    Why bother, save the money. Put a posi behind a kick azz motor
     
  7. Hackerbilt
    Joined: Aug 13, 2001
    Posts: 6,250

    Hackerbilt
    Member

    AFAIK...the only available "Posi" in an S10 is the Gov-Lock.
    It's meant as a setup for low traction in normal situations and locks IF the L & R axles speeds differ by several hundred RPM.
    That means it can come on with a BANG and that bang has been known to ****ter parts.
    I'd go with an open unless your using it for winter driving or some other situation where this type posi can help get you out of trouble.
    Otherwise it just might get you IN trouble!
     
  8. nutajunka
    Joined: Jan 24, 2007
    Posts: 1,464

    nutajunka

    If you got it use it or don't worry about it.
     
  9. roddinron
    Joined: May 24, 2006
    Posts: 2,676

    roddinron
    Member

    In your case, I can't see any real reason to have one, plus, an open one should be cheaper, and you can really impress the crowd on the right side of the road by doing smokey burn outs, plus, with proper tire rotation, you can do twice as many.:D
     
  10. dirty old man
    Joined: Feb 2, 2008
    Posts: 8,910

    dirty old man
    Member Emeritus

    If you put a posi in it, I don't think it'll eat up power unless you've got unequal tires on the back. Check em with a tape around the cir***ference while inflated to intended pressure for driving. Sometimes you can "stretch" a bias ply by over inflating and leaving it off the ground for a time. Best to make whoever sells you tires understand you gotta have a matched pair before you buy to avoid misunderstandings and consequent problems.
    Once you're driving it for the first time with a posi, get accustomed to it first (if you've never drive a posi equipped hot rod) before you start horsing around in it.
    My first posi was in a '53 Stude coupe with 327 sbc many years ago. Took it out for a test drive after installation and in less than 10 miles of driving I managed to lose it and do a 180* spin on a 2 lane street by "goosing it" off a 90* corner on a residential street! No harm done, but it is easy to let one get away from you if both rear tires are spinning.
    Dave
     
  11. el Scotto
    Joined: Mar 3, 2004
    Posts: 4,722

    el Scotto
    Member
    from Tracy, CA

    I can think of one reason.... One legger burnouts ****...
     
  12. onedge
    Joined: May 25, 2006
    Posts: 999

    onedge
    Member

    in your set up you've described I'd say no dont bother. go open, cruise it.
     
  13. 53sled
    Joined: Jul 5, 2005
    Posts: 5,817

    53sled
    Member
    from KCMO

    what springs are you going to use? I had stock ones for a time and wheel hop was terrible. Posies springs helped some, but I am still going to run traction bars. At the 2009 hamb drags i broke the locating pin off an aluminum lowering block (cheapie) and I just have to figure it was all the wheel hopping it did off the line.
     
  14. I like to do things once if possible...If you think there's even a chance that you'll ever step up to something hotter under the hood, I'd go with a posi. If not, an open with treat you just fine...

    Lockers are annoying, and a little voilent for my taste. As others have said, I think that's what you'll have with the S-10 set-up..
     
  15. like posted before.. if ya plan on road racing it do it. if its just a cruiser then don't it will have some parasitic loss of power but not much. If ya plan on putting a bigger motor in it in the near future then do it. that 6 shouldn't need a limited slip unless your going to build it to the moon.
     
  16. MarkzRodz
    Joined: Sep 12, 2009
    Posts: 533

    MarkzRodz
    BANNED

    It just goes to show that old age and wisdom are not synonymous,,,lol.
    Maybe the old guy means that when the posi finds out that there isn't a V8 up there it'll eat up the lowly 6 out of anger.
     
  17. The only power difference is in a turn with a "tight" posi such as an aftermarket one and that is minimal. I read a report in one of the rags about parasitic horse power loss and they claimed the 7.5/7.625 S-10 rears were only eating 15-18 HP and the 8.5 GM were like 18-20 HP but the Ford 9" due to it's pinnion engagement was consuming 23-28 HP depending on the final drive ratio!
     
  18. MUNCIE
    Joined: Jan 24, 2006
    Posts: 2,423

    MUNCIE
    Member
    from Houston

    Now Im secong guessing myself since my 289/302 isn't much more cubes than your 292.My setup is basically stock although I haven't rulled out a slightly larger than stock cam.My reasoning for the posi was if I were to increase my hp.Or eventually go the 351w route I would have the rear end for it hmmmm....?
     
  19. DH
    Joined: Jun 23, 2009
    Posts: 25

    DH
    Member
    from Colorado


    times 2
     
  20. RHOPPER
    Joined: Mar 12, 2006
    Posts: 263

    RHOPPER
    Member

    I've got a torquey 350 in front of a non world cl*** T5. Skinny tires and an open diff keep the load down and keep the ****** whole.
     
  21. ShastaStyle
    Joined: Jul 10, 2009
    Posts: 178

    ShastaStyle
    Member
    from Nor-Cal

    x3.....Not a fan of the one tire fryer!!
     
  22. DirtyThirty
    Joined: Mar 8, 2007
    Posts: 2,396

    DirtyThirty
    Member
    from nowhere...

    Yeah...I don't have one in the Scandalero...BUT, niether do I do burnouts with it.
    It's not a race car.
     

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.