Register now to get rid of these ads!

Sbc Intake...So many CHOICES!

Discussion in 'The Hokey Ass Message Board' started by 62chevrolet, Apr 11, 2010.

  1. 62chevrolet
    Joined: Mar 31, 2010
    Posts: 7

    62chevrolet
    Member

    I'm have a 63 Chevy Nova and NEED advice. I'm in the process of buttoning up the 302 chevy I 'm dropping in, but I'm stumped as to which intake to run. I'm running an m21 tranny and plan on 4.11 or 4.56 gears.

    What I wanted to know was, should I run a tunnel ram or one of the popular single plain high rises (i.e. Wieand Team G or Edelbrock rpm airgap)? At the drag strip the rpm airgap seems really popular. :confused:

    I don't plan on 'cruising' too much with this car... more of a stoplight to stoplight kind of car that will see a little bit of the strip too.
    I'd appreciate any advice,
    Thanks, Josh
     
  2. thadeal4real
    Joined: Feb 24, 2010
    Posts: 56

    thadeal4real
    Member
    from FRESNO, CA

    id go rpm air gap
     
  3. mikeco
    Joined: Nov 3, 2008
    Posts: 393

    mikeco
    Member
    from virginia

    Air gap best all around choice IMO. With that said, it also depends on how the motor is set up cam,compression etc.
     
  4. 62chevrolet
    Joined: Mar 31, 2010
    Posts: 7

    62chevrolet
    Member

    I'm debating between the old 30-30 cam(or comp cams version anyways) or the '140 offroad' cam that I've seen in a lot of 302's on youtube. As for compression, 10.5 ish.

    I know there are 'better' cams available for what I am trying to do, but I just really want to keep the original 302 feel or characteristics for now.
     
  5. fab32
    Joined: May 14, 2002
    Posts: 13,985

    fab32
    Member Emeritus

    Unless you want to continually tinker go with a single 4 bbl and give up the 3 hp you MIGHT gain with the multiple carburation.

    Frank
     
  6. chopolds
    Joined: Oct 22, 2001
    Posts: 6,302

    chopolds
    Member
    from howell, nj
    1. Kustom Painters

    For a high winding 302, the "almost stock" 30-30 cam is pretty mild. I had a 57 Chevy WAYYY back when, with a 302, Muncie, and 12 bolt with 4:88's. Ran a 12 1/2 to one engine, with full rollers...solid roller cam incl. Kinda over the top, but it RAN!
    I'd go with a bigger solid cam, or go with a mild solid roller, if I were you.
    Mine had a 750 Double pumper and a single plane intake, probably a Tarantula or similar, weren't too many choices with them back then.
     
  7. krusty40
    Joined: Jan 10, 2006
    Posts: 872

    krusty40
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    If you are trying to keep the original 302 "feel", why not cam it similar to what it was back then, but with a more modern profile? A solid lifter cam is what you need, not the 30/30. And why a modern intake? If you want a traditional 302 build a traditional 302. If not, build a modern 302" engine (Ours is a 303.6" SB2). vic
     
  8. 1934coupe
    Joined: Feb 22, 2007
    Posts: 5,185

    1934coupe
    Member

    Just look at what Chevy has ran throught out the years on the Z-28's and the Corvettes etc. A single highrise Holly or AFB style aluminum manifold. Edelbrock, Weiand, Offy, Holly all make one. The differences in HP does not amount to that much as compared to agravation or driveability with some race set-up or exotic intake. I'm older now and much wiser

    Pat
     
  9. 62chevrolet
    Joined: Mar 31, 2010
    Posts: 7

    62chevrolet
    Member

    I see what you guys are getting at... I guess I shouldn't be looking to reinvent the wheel. I guess what I'm really asking, is what is the best set up to get this 302 running like a raped ape?

    I don't have a problem with the new goodies, I just want stuff that works well together time after time. I know the rpm air gap is tried and true, but i just remembered it was a dual plane =o. This motor is going to wind up high so I was looking for a good intake carb match, stuff a healthy cam, have dependable spark and valve train.

    I want to hear what has worked for you guys in the past, so I can do this right the first time and so I don't have to pick up connecting rods off the street!
     
  10. why not use the cross-ram thing folks were sporting in the originals. Smokey Yunick liked them......I'd do the RPM Air Gap and call Comp Cams and tell them what you want to do and they'll get you the cam you need. They've heard it all before and they probably have a cam that will fit the bill perfectly for you.

    I don't get a kick back from Comp, they're just really big and have a tech line just for situation like this.

    Good Luck!
     
  11. Joliet Jake
    Joined: Dec 6, 2007
    Posts: 542

    Joliet Jake
    Member
    from Jax, FL

    This is the set up I have in my 62 Chevy II, it's a 350 that had an M 21 with 4;10 gears that I recently changed over to a T-5 and 3;50 gears for better highway milage. It is very streetable and fun to drive. It runs 500 Edelbrock's. Adding the extra carb made a huge difference in performance, don't let someone talk you out of a tunnel ram if that's what you really want, they work great on the street, I have two cars that both run 2X4 tunnel rams on the street and highway. Good luck with your Nova.
    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
     
  12. theHIGHLANDER
    Joined: Jun 3, 2005
    Posts: 10,514

    theHIGHLANDER
    Member

    Single plane hi-rise that will fit. Put enough solid lifter cam to make good power w/out losing cylinder pressure. 10.5 isn't a lot to start with so keep duration reasonable in your choice. Top it off with a 780 dbl pumper or an 830 annular discharge carb and hang on. Definately go with the 4.56 gears. That motor at 3500 will feel like a 350 at 2500 because of the stroke and rod length assuming they're both stock.
     
  13. colorado51
    Joined: Feb 24, 2003
    Posts: 1,576

    colorado51
    Member

    Edelbrock Victor Jr.
     

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.