Register now to get rid of these ads!

counter weights vs counter balance crankshaft

Discussion in 'The Hokey Ass Message Board' started by jnunez1955, Jun 11, 2010.

  1. jnunez1955
    Joined: Jun 2, 2010
    Posts: 51

    jnunez1955
    BANNED

    which is better/cheaper

    i have a stock model a crankshaft, and im debating whether i should keep it and have the counter weights machined on.

    or if i should spead the 500+ on a 32' b crank, and still use extra money to clean and ground it down.

    which is cheaper, which one is better?
     
  2. little skeet
    Joined: Jan 27, 2008
    Posts: 312

    little skeet
    Member
    from huston

    Seems no one wants to answer this. All I know is, a shop nearby has done Model A cranks forever. They cut out steel counter weights, and weld them to the cranks. They have a pattern they use for the correct size and clearance. Then they balance the crank, pistons and rods. Makes the Model run really smooth.
     
  3. Diavolo
    Joined: Apr 1, 2009
    Posts: 824

    Diavolo
    Member

    I don't know the particulars of a Model A crank but I do know a few basic principles on counterweight.

    First, the added weight will be able to smooth out the transitions between combustion torque and inertial torque. Additionally, the added weight counters the offset forces of the connection rod attached to the rod journal.

    Mostly I'm just flappin my jaws to keep the topic at the top, but if I was building one and had no prior knowledge, I would elect for counterbalancing the A crank, since I already had it in my possession. That's just me though.
     
  4. Bruce Lancaster
    Joined: Oct 9, 2001
    Posts: 21,681

    Bruce Lancaster
    Member Emeritus

    If running babbitt bearings, the thinner the babbitt the more durable it can be. An advantage to the B is that its larger diameter lets a worn crank be cut down to standard A. I think some people even add some main diameter above that when using them in A blocks to get a little of the extra stiffness. Most A cranks of course are a considerably undersized by now and require thick babbitt.
     
  5. Most modern engines have more bearing journal size than they need.

    I believe an early Ford may be an exception to this. I think Hank bent those cranks out of coat hangers. I saw a couple of 'em at the last shop I worked at; they were pretty light.

    I haven't seen a B crank recently enough to remember what one looks like. Do they have counterweights anywhere but the ends? If so, I might look into running one. But, I think you can also get brand new A cranks w/ weights.

    BTTT for a worthy question.

    -Bill
     
  6. jetmek
    Joined: Jan 12, 2006
    Posts: 1,847

    jetmek
    Member

    bruce's advice is right on. if you go with the b crank you need b rods and dimple the oilpan sides for clearance. i have counterweighted and dynamically balanced a cranks that use sbc rear seals. they do help them run somewhat smoother but there is no magic bullet . also...be sure to run a lightened flywheel to compensate for the added crank weight
     
  7. George Miller
    Joined: Dec 26, 2008
    Posts: 413

    George Miller
    Member
    from NC usa

    Why not spend the money and buy a new counter weighted crank. Instead of spending all that money on a 80 year old B crank that might break at the flywheel flange.
     

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.