Register now to get rid of these ads!

Anyone ever put 1952 f2 body on a later (89) chevy frame?

Discussion in 'The Hokey Ass Message Board' started by 19f1, Oct 10, 2010.

  1. 19f1
    Joined: Feb 14, 2010
    Posts: 16

    19f1
    Member
    from Norcal

    I have a 1952 f2 and I also have a 1989 1 ton chevy chassis that I was thinking of mating anyone ever done this?
    Would it be easier to use the 52 frame and upgrade gear?
     
  2. JohnEvans
    Joined: Apr 13, 2008
    Posts: 4,883

    JohnEvans
    Member
    from Phoenix AZ

    Forget that idea! Chevy chassis is much to wide track for starters.
     
  3. Shaggy
    Joined: Mar 6, 2003
    Posts: 5,207

    Shaggy
    Member
    from Sultan, WA

    If you want to update it a newer ford 3/4 ton axle like dana 60 will bolt in and there are people that can drop the axle. Other than rear ratio, there is very little reason to "upgrade" the suspention.
     
  4. FrozenMerc
    Joined: Sep 4, 2009
    Posts: 3,257

    FrozenMerc
    Member

    Use the original chassis and save your self a ton of headache. Rear end swaps are a breeze, and there are a hundred different options for the front. Everything from using the original I-Beam to Mustang II to Dakota and Aerostar IFS swaps. I have seen way to many chassis swaps with these trucks that are just plain wrong.
     
  5. 19f1
    Joined: Feb 14, 2010
    Posts: 16

    19f1
    Member
    from Norcal

    Is there a heavy duty Ifs not a fan of the rack and pinion
     
  6. bobj49f2
    Joined: Jun 1, 2008
    Posts: 1,959

    bobj49f2
    Member

    Any pre-'73 Ford rear end will bolt in. After '72 they are wider. No one makes a IFS for these Fords as far as I know.
     
  7. FrozenMerc
    Joined: Sep 4, 2009
    Posts: 3,257

    FrozenMerc
    Member

    Other than the looks, what's wrong with rack and pinion???
     
  8. 19f1
    Joined: Feb 14, 2010
    Posts: 16

    19f1
    Member
    from Norcal

    Not thrilled but I want to upgrade the stock suspension so I will have to see I checked on the Dakota kit to no avail is there a decent kit that's pretty easy or is mustang the best?
     
  9. Shaggy
    Joined: Mar 6, 2003
    Posts: 5,207

    Shaggy
    Member
    from Sultan, WA

    It's not like a straight axle is a bad set up on a truck, they are still used on a lot of rigs, probably a dropped axle and sway bar will improve handeling considerably, mabey some screwing with spring rates too
     
  10. FrozenMerc
    Joined: Sep 4, 2009
    Posts: 3,257

    FrozenMerc
    Member

    The only kit I know of is those based off a Mustang II. Using a Dakota IFS would require stubbing the frame. I run an original (not a kit) Mustang II under my '51 F-1. It works fine, but my trucks hauling days are over. If you were going to be using your F2 for hauling, towing, etc I would look for something more robust.

    But like Shaggy said, nothing wrong with a dropped straight axle either. I have ridden in a couple of straight axle classic trucks that ride as good if not better than my '51 with the Mustang II, after the owner rebuilt and upgraded the bushings, shocks, springs, etc.
     
  11. bobj49f2
    Joined: Jun 1, 2008
    Posts: 1,959

    bobj49f2
    Member

  12. 19f1
    Joined: Feb 14, 2010
    Posts: 16

    19f1
    Member
    from Norcal

    Thanks guys I'm a general contractor so I wanted the flatbed to show up to jobs and maybe deliver supplies but not more than a half ton could handle but I still want it to look like a 3/4 ton.

    I may leave it the way it is and upgrade the brakes and rear end.
     

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.