Register now to get rid of these ads!

Jag IFS Swap Questions

Discussion in 'The Hokey Ass Message Board' started by Mattilac, Jul 22, 2010.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. k-member
    Joined: May 25, 2002
    Posts: 2,114

    k-member
    Member

    Just looking at this thread and noticed a few of you doing this swap on the F-1. Any more info or pics or links would be cool. What year and type Jag would one look for?
     
  2. zman
    Joined: Apr 2, 2001
    Posts: 16,790

    zman
    Member
    from Garner, NC

    Mid 70's to '85 seems to be about the sweet spot. I have an '85 on my Buick.
     
  3. k-member
    Joined: May 25, 2002
    Posts: 2,114

    k-member
    Member

  4. zman
    Joined: Apr 2, 2001
    Posts: 16,790

    zman
    Member
    from Garner, NC

  5. k-member
    Joined: May 25, 2002
    Posts: 2,114

    k-member
    Member

    What about 88 or 89? Looks to be the same as 86 and earlier and there's 2 88's on the CL now.
     
  6. 49willard
    Joined: Nov 2, 2006
    Posts: 93

    49willard
    Member
    from Maine

    In a word, no. It does not mean that it couldn't be done. You could be the first!
     
  7. zman
    Joined: Apr 2, 2001
    Posts: 16,790

    zman
    Member
    from Garner, NC


    They are different... I haven't seen one out of the car though, so it may be workable.,
     
  8. Weasel
    Joined: Dec 30, 2007
    Posts: 6,696

    Weasel
    Member

    NEVER weld steering U joints!!!!

    http://borgeson.com/Designing/welding.htm
     
  9. zman
    Joined: Apr 2, 2001
    Posts: 16,790

    zman
    Member
    from Garner, NC

  10. retromotors
    Joined: Dec 10, 2008
    Posts: 1,045

    retromotors
    Member

    Good luck finding any solid info on that!

    There was what promised to be a very interesting and informative thread on the later Jag IFS here on the HAMB a while back, but it was deleted by the powers that be.

    I researched the 'net pretty thoroughly, and all I could find were references to the later front ends being "wider" or "too wide". (This in reference to '49 ~ '54 Chevy cars).
    The few actual width dimensions I found listed were all over the place, varying by as much as 6 inches!

    So I said to hell with it and bought a '90 XJ6 to use as a donor for my 1950 Chevy sedan.

    Haven't actually gotten into the swap yet, but a quick & rough comparison of the front end widths only shows a 2" total difference between the two cars.
    By rough comparison I mean 2x4s across the outside of the stock wheel/tire combos on each car, measured with a tape measure, in the dirt on a not-too level section of my yard. Your mileage may vary!:rolleyes:

    Now if I'd just get off my *** and do some work, I might have some concrete info to offer!:D
    Good luck!
     
    Last edited: Nov 18, 2010
  11. CoolHand
    Joined: Aug 31, 2007
    Posts: 1,942

    CoolHand
    Alliance Vendor

    I was just getting ready to post that. :D

    We weld all the steering shafts in our race cars.

    One less thing to fall apart without warning. ;)
     
  12. Good luck with at.
    The reputation of quality of the post '86 models leave me wondering if you will succeed here.
    The parts are not the same as the widely used series 1, 2 & 3 models.
    Reinventing the wheel is what it is. A true hot rodder tribute. :eek:
    They have outboard discs too :confused: .. good luck and keep us posted.
     
  13. toddc
    Joined: Nov 25, 2007
    Posts: 976

    toddc
    Member

    If you are talking about XJS or XJ12 then yes, they are the same. XJ6 (XJ40) is different.
     
  14. flamed34
    Joined: Dec 30, 2009
    Posts: 818

    flamed34
    Member

    I think you're going to run into trouble with the '90 front end. We used a '72 on our '51 Ford and it really pressed us on width and limited us with wheel choices...I'm using a narrowed '74 on my '34 Chevy (but time will tell if this will work as planned).

    While the "overall" width on the '90 may be about the same, note the deep backspacing on the wheels. Traditional "hot rod" wheels tend to have less of a back space. When you put a "normal" wheel on, you start getting too wide. This is where we got into trouble with the '51...along with a heavy drop to the car.

    Good Luck...hope I'm wrong!
     
  15. k-member
    Joined: May 25, 2002
    Posts: 2,114

    k-member
    Member

    I think I am just going to try and look for an 86 or earlier.
     
  16. retromotors
    Joined: Dec 10, 2008
    Posts: 1,045

    retromotors
    Member

    :D I looked for over a year for a series 1~3 donor car with no luck. The few I found were way overpriced. You'd think that being in the boonies of central Mississippi, I'd run across a fair price on one, but these bubbas think they're sitting on gold!

    As to the quality of the later components, the only bummer that I've read about is the ill-advised self leveling feature. Most of these were replaced with standard suspension parts under warranty, as was my donor car.

    By outboard discs, I ***ume you're referring to the rear discs. (And yes, I'll be using the rear suspension too). In my mind the outboard discs are a plus from the standpoint of maintenance. Not near as cool looking as the inboards, but not nearly the PITA to work on.

    Yep, possible wheel backspacing issues are understood. For that reason, (and a few others I won't mention!), my car may not end up being exactly HAMB friendly. If that's the case, so be it!:cool:

    This is an interesting thread. Thank you all for contributing. Information is a good thing.:D
     
  17. 27TV8
    Joined: Mar 30, 2006
    Posts: 117

    27TV8
    Member

    Hi I am working on putting Jag front and rear in my 48 1/2 ton currantly doing exhaust. I will up date my blog next week when the exhaust is in.
    http://1948fordpickup.blogspot.com/ Slow but comming along.
     
  18. 49willard
    Joined: Nov 2, 2006
    Posts: 93

    49willard
    Member
    from Maine

    I checked out your blogspot. I see pics of both the "log style" exhaust manifold and headers with the sbc. Have you fit up your steering column, joints and steering shafts? If so given the 1 1/2" offset, what fit? My sbc in my F-1 is centered and have fit up the angled back dump rams horns. I could not get any headers to fit, tried several. For me it was either the curved back rams horn or the "log style" that would work. That area is the toughest fitup in the F-1 with Jag IFS and sbc.
     
  19. CharlieBob
    Joined: Dec 26, 2008
    Posts: 71

    CharlieBob
    Member

    I have what I think is a 90 XJ6 IFS. It is wider than earlier Jag units. Mine measures 67.5" wide from outer tire bulge to bulge with stock Jag wheels, 15 x 7, 33 mm offset (5.3" backspacing) and 205/60 tires. It is too wide for most of the 30-50s cars and trucks.
     
  20. ozzie correa
    Joined: Dec 25, 2017
    Posts: 1

    ozzie correa

    i used your post to do this to my 56 f100 about four years ago man you nailed it thanks a lot that truck rode fantastic.and man did it slam it i ended up having to put 30" radius tires to clear my driveway.no regrets cost my .only difference was i went with the power rack and power brakes but you did all the hard work for me very detailed hats off to you friend
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.