Register now to get rid of these ads!

265 chev +.125 bore+ 283, doable?

Discussion in 'The Hokey Ass Message Board' started by titus, Jun 24, 2009.

  1. titus
    Joined: Dec 6, 2003
    Posts: 5,201

    titus
    Member

    Im working on a 265 chevy and are wondering if we can get away with boreing out .125, was this done alot in the past, its the same stroke as 283, and yeah i know al about sonic testing it, im just wondering if people did this or not?

    thanks
    jeff
     
  2. Hellfish
    Joined: Jun 19, 2002
    Posts: 6,816

    Hellfish
    Member

    There's an article in the current R&C about Duffy Livingstone and it says he did that exact thing in the 50s, but someone else should chime in on it
     
  3. Shaggy
    Joined: Mar 6, 2003
    Posts: 5,207

    Shaggy
    Member
    from Sultan, WA

    I've read it's been done, but probably better just to get a 283 block unless you care about the oil fiter and motor mounts
     
  4. kwoodyh
    Joined: Apr 11, 2006
    Posts: 641

    kwoodyh
    Member

    ? Why? What's magical about 283 CID for you?
     
  5. RichFox
    Joined: Dec 3, 2006
    Posts: 10,020

    RichFox
    Member Emeritus

    Yes it was done a lot in the past. Of course there were no 327, 350, 400 blocks around at that time.
     
  6. Shaggy
    Joined: Mar 6, 2003
    Posts: 5,207

    Shaggy
    Member
    from Sultan, WA

    1/8 of bore makes it turn rpms easier, ask anyone farmiliar with 301's, same deal only 1/8 more
     
  7. 53sled
    Joined: Jul 5, 2005
    Posts: 5,817

    53sled
    Member
    from KCMO

    why bother? put good heads on a 350 and use a cool intake, nobody will know and you save $3000 looking for a block with enough meat.
     
  8. jagfxr1949
    Joined: Jun 27, 2008
    Posts: 277

    jagfxr1949
    Member

    It has been a lot over the yers, but I would sonic test the block to make sure that 50 years of corrosion have not gotten to it.
     
  9. titus
    Joined: Dec 6, 2003
    Posts: 5,201

    titus
    Member

    I dont think i asked for opinions weather i should do it or not, i just was asking if it was done in the past, i am doing this motor for a customer and he wants the original block in his 56 chevy, were are going with 2x4 set up too, he wants to make it look factory, is that enough back ground, i have 7 350's a bunch of 327's and 283 but this is what he wants, plain and simple.

    and thanks everyone for the helpful input.



    thanks
    jeff
     
  10. yes , it has been done in the past. i believe chevy did it themself. i've always heard that the first factory 283s were bored out 265 blocks....so, don't think you will have any problems with a 265 block...i say go for it. do you know what casting number it is?
     
  11. Yes Jeff, I have all the parts plus some NOS MT pistons to do it in mine.
     
  12. titus
    Joined: Dec 6, 2003
    Posts: 5,201

    titus
    Member

    3720991 is the casting number 56-265, it has the oil filter boss on it, and no motor mounts, it had the power pack heads and a 4bbl but were going with camel backs and a 2x4 intake.

    jeff
     
  13. OoltewahSpeedShop
    Joined: Oct 18, 2007
    Posts: 3,103

    OoltewahSpeedShop
    Member


    I get the same **** for messing with this flathead stuff...
     
  14. overspray
    Joined: Jan 14, 2003
    Posts: 1,447

    overspray
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    Go for it! I did one back in the 70's for a 56 Vette. I talked to an old machinist and he said he had done lots of them and no problems with thin cylinder walls. I had a nice set of stock 283 pistons and I used them and had a 350HP 327 cam milled (back journal for oiling-look at the stock 265 cam) and used the stock distributor (has a flat spot that works with the cam slot) and a Corvette 2X4 set-up. It was a screamer for a small engine and worked fine.

    overspray
     
  15. Gotzy
    Joined: May 21, 2005
    Posts: 494

    Gotzy
    Member

    A lot will say it can't be done but i'm on the go for it fence. If the block turns out a little thin you could run a 1/2 fill and a oil cooler. Some late model vettes had a water oil cooler that fits between the oil filter and block and can be tapped in to to drain plug holes and could be inobvious if hard piped carefully. That would be my approach anyway, make sure you let us know how you get on.
     
  16. amodel25
    Joined: Nov 21, 2006
    Posts: 705

    amodel25
    Member

    I did it in '67 on a '55 block....no problems. Ran an 098 Duntov solid cam, early vette dual point distributor, 650 Holley, Hedman Headers.
     
  17. Edelbroke
    Joined: Dec 12, 2008
    Posts: 770

    Edelbroke
    BANNED

    cant hurt to try it, A high reving motor is a whole nouther beast, I had a 69' 302 chev block in a 26' Ford roadster, shifting at 7k is alot of fun
     
  18. butch nassau
    Joined: Nov 29, 2008
    Posts: 205

    butch nassau
    Member

    Seen it done a hundred times in the fifties....no problem.
     
  19. BELLM
    Joined: Nov 16, 2002
    Posts: 2,590

    BELLM
    Member

    I have one out in the shop, '56 265 bored 283, ported power pak heads, back in early 60s ran 3x2 setup in a T roadster, mid 60s Enderle injected in an altered roadster. Now I got it, mostly just needs cleaning from sitting for about 20 years. Olin Tieman in Taylor has a 265 bored 283 in his 32 coupe, been running it since '57. Very doable.
     
  20. bangngears
    Joined: Aug 30, 2007
    Posts: 1,340

    bangngears
    Member
    from ofallon mo

    I bored out a 265 .125 to a 283 in the 60s,drove it home from the west coast with 4-11 gears. ran fine but was at 210 degrees all the time.So it has been done,dont recommend wasting a block,bore it to a good clean up bore. you really do not gain that much by taking it out to.125.
     
  21. dbradley
    Joined: Jan 6, 2007
    Posts: 1,036

    dbradley
    Member

    If the customer is REALLY picky, he'll want 3731762 casting heads. Double humps are later model. ('60-'67)
     
  22. Snarl
    Joined: Feb 16, 2007
    Posts: 1,639

    Snarl
    Member

    A friend of mine who does **** restorations on '56 Chevies took out a 265 to 283 without issues. I would suggest getting the block checked for core shift before you do it though.

    He has also turned one into a 350, but it required wet sleeving 2 of the cylinders, using/modifying a 350 crank, and some other stuff.
    He did it because he could, and he wanted to keep the car "numbers correct". The car is a trailer queen, so how well it would hold up to regular use, is debatable...
     
  23. Scotch
    Joined: May 4, 2001
    Posts: 1,489

    Scotch
    Member

    Jeff-

    It can be done if there's no core shift in the block.

    If you want any help on this, let me know. I've got some great local connects for machine work.
     
  24. titus
    Joined: Dec 6, 2003
    Posts: 5,201

    titus
    Member

    we went with 461 or 462's cant remember, 194 150 valves, not 202's

    Scotch, when my work close i bought all the machine shop equipment, so i can do it all at home.

    JEFF
     
  25. dirty old man
    Joined: Feb 2, 2008
    Posts: 8,910

    dirty old man
    Member Emeritus

    Did just what you're talking about to a '55 block in about '62. Used '57 power pack heads& 4bbl intake and a WCFB off an Olds with the original .012 & .018 Duntov cam, all in a '53 Studebaker coupe. It was a fast car in it's day, especially on top end.
    Now that sonic testing is fairly easily available I would check the block for core shift before using the boring bar This could save you from killing a now increasingly rare block for those that just gotta have the correct numbers and configuration stuff.
    Dave
     
  26. titus
    Joined: Dec 6, 2003
    Posts: 5,201

    titus
    Member

    oh, by the way, i already bored the block to .030 and ordered up pistons, its been a while since i posted the original question.

    but thanks for all the fresh input, i may have to do one of these in the future!

    JEFF
     
  27. Scotch
    Joined: May 4, 2001
    Posts: 1,489

    Scotch
    Member

    Really? Wow- that's cool. So..check the cylinder wall thickness and do the math to determine core shift and go from there.

    If I need help with some machine stuff, I'll let ya know. Are you moving into this kind of work more now, or is car building still your primary focus?

    I could send more work your way if you're doing engine machining stuff. My 'race engine' guys are great so there's usually a long wait. Some pals of mine wanting to do more mild builds might be interested in working with you to get some projects moving forward.
     
  28. rover
    Joined: Aug 24, 2010
    Posts: 35

    rover
    Member
    from pomona

    i know its been a while with this thread. i am plaanning to do this same build. i have a similar question to add. i have a set of 283 pistons, that are new, that are .030 over. can i make these work in my 56 265. or is that just too much? i will try .125 over but i would like to use what i have.
     
  29. JeffreyJames
    Joined: Jun 13, 2007
    Posts: 16,626

    JeffreyJames
    Member
    from SUGAR CITY

    I punched out my 265 .125" and that was the absolute max that I could go so another .30 would be a no go. I think just getting the correct parts would be you best bet.
     
  30. Yep !! I've done this exact same thing to save some original vette engine blocks to keep the car original !!! >>>>.
     

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.