Register now to get rid of these ads!

Would you save this?

Discussion in 'The Hokey Ass Message Board' started by ejsands, Dec 12, 2010.

  1. ejsands
    Joined: Nov 24, 2009
    Posts: 56

    ejsands
    Member
    from Upstate NY

    Thanks, Dorsey. You make a great point about the DD costs.

    I know nothing about swapping frames out, though I am open to using a modern day suspension. There is a lot of appeal into switching into something like that such as the brake upgrade and such. I looked up the front frame dimensions in my service manual, and posted a picture. Maybe someone who knows a little better about this can give me more info on what would work if I cannot find a solid donor from another 58-61 Rambler.

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]
     
    Last edited: Dec 14, 2010
  2. mickeyc
    Joined: Jul 8, 2008
    Posts: 1,392

    mickeyc
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    You mention frame rust. I seem to recall the rambler I had was a unibody
    similar to a early nova or such.
     
  3. ejsands
    Joined: Nov 24, 2009
    Posts: 56

    ejsands
    Member
    from Upstate NY

    That is correct. The front section from the firewall forward is toast... the rear is less severe, though a wee bit rusty.

    I have the original owners manual and window sticker for this car.. as well as detailed log and receipts dating back to 1993. The car had been undercoated several times since 1993... as well as suspension components replaced through various repairs (balljoints, bushings, etc). Somewhere between 1997 and 2003 (when we bought the car) there is a huge gap of non-information. Not sure what happened between that time period to let the car rot so severely so fast. Like the front end was parked in the Dead Sea or something.

    If I am able to find a donor frame from another car, I assumed that the front section can be cut off and the "new" metal grafted in.
     
  4. pugs
    Joined: Dec 18, 2008
    Posts: 498

    pugs
    Member
    from Hamburg Pa

    the track width of the 78-easrly80's monte carlo is 58.5", not sure what the rambler is
     
  5. rustyford40
    Joined: Nov 20, 2007
    Posts: 2,168

    rustyford40
    Member
    from Mass Bay

    I don't think a clip would work without a full frame rebuild. That unibody won't take much hp.
     
  6. oj
    Joined: Jul 27, 2008
    Posts: 6,541

    oj
    Member

    That car is a survivor and a keeper! Stick a front clip under it (nova or camaro) an sbc and lower it a tad, 4 speed with the bench seat and you'll have a car that everybody will love and respect.
    I tool around in a '67 International Travelall and i have a smile from ear to ear. It is different, it can be far from perfect because there isn't another around that people can compare it to. Like your Rambler, it has personality and that is priceless.
     
  7. ejsands
    Joined: Nov 24, 2009
    Posts: 56

    ejsands
    Member
    from Upstate NY

    I think it is considerably less... somewhere in the area of 45". The distance from the inside edge of the RF frame to the LF is 31.5" according to the diagram, and 38 3/8" from the front tip to the firewall.
     
  8. 53sled
    Joined: Jul 5, 2005
    Posts: 5,817

    53sled
    Member
    from KCMO

    Looking at the drawing you posted, I don't think that 45" is correct, that leaves no room to turn the wheels.

    wiki has it at 55"
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rambler_American

    perfect for an s10.
     
  9. Da Tinman
    Joined: Dec 29, 2005
    Posts: 4,222

    Da Tinman
    Member


    yeppers!
     
  10. pugs
    Joined: Dec 18, 2008
    Posts: 498

    pugs
    Member
    from Hamburg Pa

    if its 55", i would look for a donor car or do your own rails for the stock setup or a build a sub frame for MII
     
  11. ejsands
    Joined: Nov 24, 2009
    Posts: 56

    ejsands
    Member
    from Upstate NY


    The American is a very different model than my car. I believe it is smaller, but even if that is the case, then 45" is obviously still not right. The car is not at hand for me to measure. Who knows, perhaps the Classic/Six had the same track width. My shop manual does not reference the American since it is a different car. This is something I'll have to take up with the AMC board, I suppose.

    I'll hunt for a replacement in the meantime and resort to other means if something suitable cannot be found.

    Thanks again for all the advice and help. You guys (and gals) are really great. :)
     
    Last edited: Dec 16, 2010
  12. pugs
    Joined: Dec 18, 2008
    Posts: 498

    pugs
    Member
    from Hamburg Pa

    i was at the local yard today and looked at one there and even tho it wasnt to bad of shape i think it wouldnt be hard to cut out the old rails and add 2x4 box rails in its place. i also looked at which i believe was a year or 2 newer and the frame rails looked somewhat similar, but the crossmember and lower arms are a different style
     
  13. pigpen
    Joined: Aug 30, 2004
    Posts: 1,624

    pigpen
    Member
    from TX USA

    Not too bad; I've seen worse. A nice piece of history. pigpen

    [​IMG]
     
  14. pigpen
    Joined: Aug 30, 2004
    Posts: 1,624

    pigpen
    Member
    from TX USA



    Yes. I wanted to say that too. pigpen
     
  15. pigpen
    Joined: Aug 30, 2004
    Posts: 1,624

    pigpen
    Member
    from TX USA


    Who are you calling stuffy? :D And a "cogger" too? Looks like someone didn't do too well in English 101. :eek: pigpen
     
  16. ...I have a good title for a 60 Rambler wagon...
     

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.