Register now to get rid of these ads!

53-56 f100 rear brakes

Discussion in 'The Hokey Ass Message Board' started by banjo, Dec 24, 2010.

  1. banjo
    Joined: Jan 23, 2008
    Posts: 87

    banjo
    Member

    will these fit on my 39 with little or no mods? thanks
     
  2. designs that work
    Joined: Aug 29, 2005
    Posts: 411

    designs that work
    Member

    no, about two months ago there was a post here on cutting the centers out and rotating the outers and welding back together. I would not recomend that.
     
  3. 40Tudor
    Joined: Jan 1, 2002
    Posts: 635

    40Tudor
    Member
    from MN

    Might be missing something here, but I have those brakes on my '40 - same spindles as OPs '39 if it's stock. DTW - why do you say the centers need to be cut/welded?

    You'll have to clearance the spindles a bit for the brake hose but they do bolt on. The bearing numbers are available here somewhere. You have to mod the inner race of the inner bearing to fit the radius at the base of your spindles.

    Get the self-adjusting hardware from a newer truck (like a '65 Ford). Many of the wheel cylinders from that era fit, so you have a lot of bore sizes to choose from.

    Of course you know that it'll be 5x5.5 rather than wide 5. The front track width ended up real narrow with my aftermarket dropped axle, probably would be OK with one that's stock width.
     
  4. treb11
    Joined: Jan 21, 2006
    Posts: 4,132

    treb11
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    yes you are -"rear"
    <input id="gwProxy" type="hidden"><!--Session data--><input onclick="jsCall();" id="jsProxy" type="hidden">
     
  5. banjo
    Joined: Jan 23, 2008
    Posts: 87

    banjo
    Member

    dtw- im a little lost(imagine that) cutting the centers out of the drums?rotating the outers?
     
  6. The backing plates not the drums.
     
  7. chrisntx
    Joined: Jan 20, 2006
    Posts: 1,799

    chrisntx
    Member
    from Texas .

    I recommend it as well as everyone else who has done it
    I have no idea what you mean by 'rotating the outers'.
     
  8. designs that work
    Joined: Aug 29, 2005
    Posts: 411

    designs that work
    Member

    The original post was Re 53-56 rear brakes. I answered that question. The 53 - 56 REAR BRAKES will not bolt onto my 1934 banjo. I run the 53 - 56 FRONT BRAKES on my Avatar. The recent post was about cutting the centers out of the rear backing plates and either welding the outers to the early backing plates or rotating the 56 outers to put the wheel cylinders at the top. I would not recommend doing either. If you were a machinest you might be able to machine a adaptor to go from the early axel mounting flange to the 53 - 56 REAR BACKING PLATES.
     
  9. i'm a little lost too, are you (banjo) asking about trying to put f100 REAR brakes on a 1939 REAR banjo rearend or are trying to put f100 REAR brakes on the FRONT of a 1939 car/truck?
     
  10. 40Tudor
    Joined: Jan 1, 2002
    Posts: 635

    40Tudor
    Member
    from MN

    Yup - I missed something. Got it now. Musta been the egg nog talking last night.
     
  11. banjo
    Joined: Jan 23, 2008
    Posts: 87

    banjo
    Member

    original post, putting 53-56 rear truck brakes, on a 39 banjo rear, done some checking, and found out its not a bolt on, but, there is an article in the archives on how to adapt early 90s f150s to banjo rear ends, think i'll just stick with the fronts, thanks for all the replys!
     
  12. sadly the most direct bolt on is the lincolns.
     

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.