Register now to get rid of these ads!

1962 Chrysler 8 3/4 rear end?

Discussion in 'The Hokey Ass Message Board' started by smalltownspeed, Dec 31, 2010.

  1. smalltownspeed
    Joined: Apr 20, 2004
    Posts: 872

    smalltownspeed
    Member

    EDIT, just found out its a 8 3/4, not a 8 1/4

    To start off, if there is a already a post along these lines, I cant find it, so shoot it my way. I cant get the search to recgonize "8.25" or "8 1/4" as one item.

    Ive got a 53 studebaker champion thats had a 327/th350 swaped in, but still has the stock dana 27 rear that leaks and needs the brakes re-done, so I just want to swap in a stronger rear end. I found a 1962 Chrysler 8.25, thats the correct width and bolt pattern that was taken out of a running car. Can someone school me on the in's and out's/strengths and weak points of these?


    Thanks,
    Cory



    Or if any of yall have an affordable 8" or 9" ford thats 51" between the backing plates that would be sweet too....
     
    Last edited: Jan 5, 2011
  2. The 8 1/4 for a Mopar,Is like the 10 bolt for a Chevy.It's a good reliable differential.They have the strength to handle a bit of horse power.Are you sure it's a 8 1/4? That diff came out in the mid 70's.What gearing does it have?
     
    Last edited: Dec 31, 2010
  3. marfen
    Joined: Aug 14, 2009
    Posts: 459

    marfen
    Member
    from sask

    Us mopar guys kinda stay away from 8.25 diffs because it's needs to be rebuilt to change the gears, we usually go for the 8 3/4 which is way stronger and , with the exchangable carrier , easy to change gears. I also stay away from mopar diffs pre 65 since they have that miserable keyed axle/rear hub setup. You're better off looking for a 65-67 B body 8 3/4, or if you're lucky, find an A-body 8 3/4 which are the narrowest but hard to find since everybody wants one.
     
  4. smalltownspeed
    Joined: Apr 20, 2004
    Posts: 872

    smalltownspeed
    Member

    Im wondering if there are 2 different 8.25 rears that chrysler madem, because like frank dog said I have seen some refrences that said they were not made untill 72ish. But it is definatly a 8.25 chrysler product(it was behind a 225 6cyl/904 auto)

    I know the 8 3/4 would be a better choice, but I havent been able to find any(in the right width/price range). The 8.25 should hold a mild 327/th350 with bias plies, right?

    And those keyed axle/drum set ups are a real pain in the ass, and I would rather not have them, but the studebaker had those on there to begin with, and since I havent come up with any better options, Im willing to deal with those.
     
  5. Hnstray
    Joined: Aug 23, 2009
    Posts: 12,355

    Hnstray
    ALLIANCE MEMBER
    from Quincy, IL

    A Ford Maverick 8" should be about perfect for your purposes. But, PLEASE, discontinue using the backing plate to backing plate measurement. It is virtually useless when compared to the far more accurate "wheel mounting surface to wheel mounting surface" as that is far more accurate when trying to replace an rear end. Of course, if one is willing to, or planning to, run different wheels on the new rear end you may be able to use a different WMS to WMS distance, but even in that case it is more useful, in my opinion, to determine what that distance needs to be with the tires and wheels you are planning to use.

    As for the Mopar 8.25, I am unfamiliar with the earlier models you ask about. I do know something about the later versions as used widely in Jeep, Dodge car and truck and rear drive Chryslers. The narrowest of these is probably too wide for your Stude, but they are a decent rear end as built. Being the "Salisbury" style, with the integrated carrier housing, they are more difficult to change gears under the car, should that be an issue.

    Ray
     
  6. Hackerbilt
    Joined: Aug 13, 2001
    Posts: 6,250

    Hackerbilt
    Member

    My 63 Dodge with a slant 6 and PB auto came with an 8.75 rearend.
    Does your rear have an inspection cover over the back or do you need to remove the front chunk to see the gears?
    8.25 has the cover while the 8.75 rear has a front loading chunk like the 9" Ford.
    I'm also doubtful that the later 8.25 had keyed axle flanges...BUT I don't know for sure!
     
  7. Hnstray
    Joined: Aug 23, 2009
    Posts: 12,355

    Hnstray
    ALLIANCE MEMBER
    from Quincy, IL

    I think there is some confusion about the earlier integral carrier rear ends being 8.25" models. There were no doubt similar axle housings, but I think they are smaller, maybe 7" or 7.5" units. I do not know if they had the tapered/keyed axle shafts or not. But, to my knowledge, the later true Corporate 8.25" was never produced with taperedd/keyed axle shafts. Also, if or when sourcing from a Jeep product, you have to be careful you are getting an 8.25 as many Jeep Wranglers and Cherokees were built with Dana 35 rear axle assemblies and they look similar but are not as strong as the 8.25.

    Ray
     
  8. plym_46
    Joined: Sep 8, 2005
    Posts: 4,018

    plym_46
    Member
    from central NY

    Take a look at 90's regular jeep cherokee. availabel in 3.55 ratio and if you find a 2wd, it usualy limited slip also. With consideration to the post above, regarding Mopar vs Dana.
     
  9. 23reotim
    Joined: Feb 5, 2008
    Posts: 139

    23reotim
    Member
    from arizona

    could be a 7 1/4. those were used in the early 60's. i would stay away from it if it is.
     
  10. Post a picture of the diff that you picked up and then we can see what you have.
     
  11. smalltownspeed
    Joined: Apr 20, 2004
    Posts: 872

    smalltownspeed
    Member

    I just found out is a 8 3/4(still from a 62). I will try to post pics, but my other computer crashed, and Im trying to get stuff moved over to my new one
     

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.