Register now to get rid of these ads!

Why are there sum old cars missing ?

Discussion in 'The Hokey Ass Message Board' started by The Shocker, Jan 12, 2011.

  1. The Shocker
    Joined: Dec 30, 2004
    Posts: 3,538

    The Shocker
    Member

    Ever notice that there are alot of years of old cars you just dont see many of ? Is it because they were not as popular or what .I will give you a few examples of what im talking about.

    1959 -1961 Plymouths and Dodges
    1958 Impalas (not refering to 2 or 4 dr sedans here)
    1957 -1959 Buicks ,Olds ,and Pontiacs
    1957-1958 Cadilacs

    Im not saying that these models are extinct ,but you just dont see them in the #'s of others ,why ???
     
  2. George
    Joined: Jan 1, 2005
    Posts: 8,000

    George
    Member

    Think there was a minor recession about that time.
     
  3. Blown Mopar
    Joined: Oct 14, 2009
    Posts: 272

    Blown Mopar
    Member
    from abc

    Well the 58 Impala was a 1 year thing. It's hard to find sheet metal for one. They are neat cars if you can find one re-buildable.
     
  4. fab32
    Joined: May 14, 2002
    Posts: 13,985

    fab32
    Member Emeritus

    Cool cars got saved................uncool cars go turned into toasters and mail boxes.

    Frank
     
  5. The Shocker
    Joined: Dec 30, 2004
    Posts: 3,538

    The Shocker
    Member

    Agreed on the recession thing ( i wasnt alive for about 15 more years ,but my dad told me about this recession many times) .Why do you see a hundred 59 and 60 Impalas for every 58 though ???
     
  6. chrisntx
    Joined: Jan 20, 2006
    Posts: 1,799

    chrisntx
    Member
    from Texas .

    I was there in the 50s and a lot of cars were undesirable from the day they were new. I remember the type of man who would buy a Rambler and if you saw one of those guys you wouldnt want to be ***ociated with him by owning one either. International pickups, 48-52 Dodges, the list goes on and on, in fact Fords were just about the only car used for traditional hotrods.
    Traditional hotrods were almost entirely Fords until the small block chevy came out in 55
     
  7. lawman
    Joined: Sep 19, 2006
    Posts: 2,665

    lawman
    Member

    I guess thats how you "Sum" it up !!!!!!
     
  8. The Shocker
    Joined: Dec 30, 2004
    Posts: 3,538

    The Shocker
    Member

    Agree with you on the 58 being a one off ch***is deal ,even though it was still an "X" frame car as the 59-64's were but it is still abit different ,but 59 and 60 are one of a kinds body wise also .What i mean is 59 and 60 doors arent interchangable nor are the frontends ...
     
  9. The Shocker
    Joined: Dec 30, 2004
    Posts: 3,538

    The Shocker
    Member

    I have heard this story as well from my late father and this kinda makes sense to me .I just didnt know that alot of these cars were labeled as "turds" from day one.Wish i woulda been there to see all this stuff first hand ,then i wouldnt have to ask you guys.Your right about the 51-54 Dodge cars and the International truck thing as well .You dont see many of them either :) ...
     
  10. hotrod40coupe
    Joined: Apr 8, 2007
    Posts: 2,561

    hotrod40coupe
    Member

    As mentioned, there was a recession at the time and '58 was the first year for the Impala, only 125,480 Sport Coupes were made and it was a major departure for Chevrolet design. Plymouths were "Old Maid" cars, Dodge was **** and not very popular with the younger crowd. Any of the upscale GM cars were big and pricey making them less desireable.
     
  11. Many cars that are cool now, weren't in the 70's and 80's. Some repairs would be more than the car was worth and therefore the car got s****ped. I knew a girl that s****ped a 66 Mustang convert in the late 70's because it needed a valve job or something
     
  12. The Shocker
    Joined: Dec 30, 2004
    Posts: 3,538

    The Shocker
    Member

    Keep these no BS answers coming guys im soaking it up learning fast ...
     
  13. Never2low
    Joined: Jan 14, 2008
    Posts: 1,181

    Never2low
    Member

    I hear ya. My mom's first car was a brand new '67 cutl*** convrt.
    Been going to car shows for almost 10 years now, still have yet to see one. What I have seen, is about 500, '68-70's thou. Guess it depends on production numbers, how desireable they were considered back then. Some models that are coveted now, were seen as just another junker, way back when.

    I do like the thought that my mailbox had a former life as a '37 coupe...
     
  14. flamed34
    Joined: Dec 30, 2009
    Posts: 818

    flamed34
    Member

    I had 2 '60 Plymouths. 1960 was the first year of uni-body construction, and as such prone to a lot of rot. Rot plagued Plymouths even before the '60 - typically when you find '57s and '58s, they are rusted out to the door handles especially in the rust belt. 1959 was a 1-year only body, stuck between the body style of the 57/58 and the new uni-body of the '60s (which also were a 1 year only body style).
     
  15. KoolKat-57
    Joined: Feb 22, 2010
    Posts: 3,092

    KoolKat-57
    Member
    from Dublin, OH

    [​IMG]My 57 is a prime example, hard to find parts... expensive!
    Mechanically many parts are 55-57 Pontiac only!
    Tri-Power/3 speed stick, less than 2% of 57's were stick cars!
    When you find spare stick parts you buy them if you can, And put them on the shelf just in case!
    Fast cars but they were tough to built compared to Chevy and Ford at the time.
     
  16. The Shocker
    Joined: Dec 30, 2004
    Posts: 3,538

    The Shocker
    Member

    Another good point that didnt occour to me.I owned and drove daily a 56 Pontiac with a factory stick shift .You are correct about the 55-57 Pontiacs being hard to find mechanical parts for and interchange only with 55-57 ...
     
  17. lothiandon1940
    Joined: May 24, 2007
    Posts: 32,506

    lothiandon1940
    Member

    Groucho makes a very good point. A lot of cars have only become "cool" long after they were built. The '58 Chevys were long overshadowed by the tri-five cars which were lighter in weight and frankly more stylish.(I'm sure I'll catch some flack over that statement). Same really holds true for the '57-'59 BOP cars. The Chevies of that era were more affordable and found in larger numbers. I don't think the 60's MoPars really became popular until they were used extensively for drag racing especially when the funny car phenomenon arrived on the scene. As for the Caddys, nobody I know could afford a Caddy back then, not that they weren't nice cars, just out of the reach of aspiring young hot rodders at that time. Just my musings. Feel free to object....Don.
     
  18. flamed34
    Joined: Dec 30, 2009
    Posts: 818

    flamed34
    Member

    With the Mopars as well...the Plymouths were available with the Commando V8's and Golden Commando V8's - the 1960 Golden Commando was a 413 with the famous long tube cross ram intake - but were not nearly as stylish or as heavily optioned as the Chrysler 300's and Chrysler 300 F's (letter cars). Few were sold, and as such, didn't have the performance reputation of other monikers.
     
  19. InPrimer
    Joined: Mar 10, 2003
    Posts: 778

    InPrimer
    Member

    Living in the rust belt in the 50' & 60's I can ***ure you the salt got the best of them in a hurry. My Dad's '57 Ply was already rusting by '61 though it was washed and waxed as often as possible.The Ramblers, later AM Motors were also unibody and a lot of them folded at the firewall, also remember the mentality at that time, buy new every other yr .Car designs were changing very quickly and people were "convinced" esp by GM to keep up with the Joneses.
     
  20. lothiandon1940
    Joined: May 24, 2007
    Posts: 32,506

    lothiandon1940
    Member

    ...Excellent point... Those Chrysler "letter cars" were legendary performers, also priced way out of the reach of the average young guy at the time.
     
  21. rustyford40
    Joined: Nov 20, 2007
    Posts: 2,168

    rustyford40
    Member
    from Mass Bay

    A friend of mines father bought a 58 Impala conv, with a 348. I thought that was the king of the road. Until my old man bough a turn pike cruiser. You know we had to race our old mans cars. I won Mark rolled the Impala. So that is why one is missing.
     
  22. I Drag
    Joined: Apr 11, 2007
    Posts: 883

    I Drag
    Member

    Groucho and Lothiandon1940 are onto it about '58 impalas. It's exactly because they were not as desirable as 55-57's that they made cheap first cars for a lot of baby-boomers. These same guys went crazy over them starting in the late '80's (because they used to have one) and prices of '58 impalas have been sky-high ever since.

    '58 impalas are my favorite all-time car, but they're just too expensive for me now.
     
  23. The Shocker
    Joined: Dec 30, 2004
    Posts: 3,538

    The Shocker
    Member

    Those late 50's Mercs are another you dont see .I know where there is a running 4 door 59 Merc Turn pike cruiser for sale here in town .Although its a pretty nice car and cheap ,they guy hasnt been able to sell it .Its been for sale of and on for 3 years now ...
     
  24. brad chevy
    Joined: Nov 22, 2009
    Posts: 2,627

    brad chevy
    Member

    Remember how popular the 55-56-57- Chevies,Fords,Olds,Buicks were and still are ,well in 58 all of them had a drastic change to the dual headlight boxcars and nobody wanted them,but now they are popular,but just too late.
     
  25. Harms Way
    Joined: Nov 27, 2005
    Posts: 6,954

    Harms Way
    Member

    And lets not forget those Harbor Freight Tools !:D
     
  26. The Shocker
    Joined: Dec 30, 2004
    Posts: 3,538

    The Shocker
    Member

    I have noticed how high 58 Impalas are when you find one.Even a POS seems to be $7000-$8000 or more nowdays.I have seen a few right out of a pasture factory 348 Convertables priced for insane money .I used to own a 58 Delray 2 door sedan ,but it was wrecked when i bought ,and i never got it on the road .I like them too and almost bought another one just like it that wasnt wrecked a few years ago ...
     
  27. dorf
    Joined: Dec 5, 2008
    Posts: 1,085

    dorf
    Member
    from ohio

    (fords were the thing untill the small block chevy) MAN U MUST HAVE NEVER HEARD OF OLDSMOBILE
     
  28. my first car was a 64 lemans 2 door convertible....3 on the tree, with a factory 250 chevy 6 banger...the column shift was replaced twice..my aunt Stella gave it to me the summer before my 16th birthday (oct bd)...i had a hell of a time finding parts for it...local parts store said i was full of bs when i took back some parts and brought in the the original stuff off the car to get the right stuff....found out later that my aunt and uncle got a steal on the car in dec 64...it had 24,000 miles on it...was a demo and everyone was always wanting to test drive it cause it was a vert...

    i stuffed a spark-o-matic shifter thru the floor and drove it till the 1974 hail prior to the tornado trashed it..no top left and the hood and rear deck lid looked like someone spent a weekend trying to bounce bowling balls off it...

    back on topic, i have hunted for years trying to find one...best i've come up with is a few 64 GTO's and a couple of lemans turned gto clone convertibles...

    wasn't an ugly car, smaller then the 65 ponchos....drove well and handled nicely...i tried once to find some production numbers on the 64 lemans convertibles, but came up empty handed....
     
  29. Hnstray
    Joined: Aug 23, 2009
    Posts: 12,356

    Hnstray
    Member
    from Quincy, IL

    Interesting comments..........some more accurate than others. There was a recession in the '58 to '61 period which reduced car sales volume siginficantly, but not as bad as recent years, percentagewise. Although I am something of a Mopar fan, the Plymouths and Dodges built through '52 had Briggs bodies and were much more solidly constructed than subsequent models. The '53/'54 models were downsized and not very popular, and somewhat poorly built, especially when compared to GM bodies of the time. The combination of the recession and the **** ugly styling of the '60 and '61 Plymouths was a double whammy.

    An interesting trivia item.....'57 and '59 were the only two years Ford outsold Chevy since 1937 up to that point. The '57 & especially the '59 Chevys were somewhat controversial when new. Yet today, a '57 Ford seems much scarcer than '57 Chevs. Same for '59's I think.

    For those critics of the '49/'52 Plymouths and Dodges...they were very substantial, excellent riding, dependable vehciles for the day. Stodgy? Yes..no question. But remember, Ford/Chevy/Plymouth ran a very close 1st, 2nd & 3rd in sales volume...The Low Priced Three!

    Ray
     
  30. tb33anda3rd
    Joined: Oct 8, 2010
    Posts: 17,588

    tb33anda3rd
    Member

    those chrysler products were rusted by the time they hit the end of the ***emble line! i would bet that those big heavy cars were more valuable as s**** at the time they hit the point that all cars get to when a major repair needed to be done.
     

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.