Register now to get rid of these ads!

I'm tempted to set the engine back in my 50 Coupe

Discussion in 'The Hokey Ass Message Board' started by R Frederick, Dec 29, 2010.

  1. Bert Kollar
    Joined: Jan 10, 2007
    Posts: 1,261

    Bert Kollar
    Member

    Move it back It improves handling immensly. I moved the engine in my coupe six inches and the big block in my p/u 8 inches along with moving the body back. The p/u handles like a go kart and the coupe handles perfectly
     

    Attached Files:

  2. theHIGHLANDER
    Joined: Jun 3, 2005
    Posts: 10,733

    theHIGHLANDER
    Member

    I just did an engine set back last month. I set my 472 Cadillac in the back of the shop:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D

    Sorry man, couldn't help it...
     
  3. Wicked

    Changing your weight bias even just a little makes all the difference in the world. It certainly isn't necessary to move the engine back to drive the car but it will make a difference in the way it drives.

    Someone mentioned that moveing the engine back is real hard to do. It isn't rocket science. You have to build mounts anyway. As far as the forewall is concerned its just a matter of making a hole in the fire wall to accomodate the engine then building the wall back around the engine.

    A lot of times you can make a big difference without even molesting the firewall. Most cars have a couple of inches to be gained leaving the firewall pretty much stock, maybe you'll need to trim some boltheads or a flange.

    Anyway with the talents you have already established moving the engine back isn't going to be that big a deal for you. Its just a matter of what you want out of the car.
     
    Last edited: Jan 3, 2011
  4. falcongeorge
    Joined: Aug 26, 2010
    Posts: 18,339

    falcongeorge
    Member
    from BC

    You mean to say you are actually going to build a g***er, instead of a "g***er"? Heresy!!
     
  5. hrm2k
    Joined: Oct 2, 2007
    Posts: 5,468

    hrm2k
    ALLIANCE MEMBER




    You can see the motor mount on the side of the block. That motor mount when put on an S-10 front end is on the front side of the cross member. You can kind of see how much it moved back
    We actually dropped the engine down about 4 inches from the normal height on an S-10 conversion.
    We had no intention of doing any of this when we started
    ( famous last words ?) when we cut the firewall we found 3 layers of rusted metal...original floor and firewall, another layer spot welded in over the top of the original rusted metal and another layer under the original rusted metal. It was at that point the build took a different direction.
     
  6. R Frederick
    Joined: Mar 30, 2009
    Posts: 2,658

    R Frederick
    Member
    from illinois

    I think I'm as far back as I can go without really screwing with moving the whole fiewall back due to header placement. I'm sure that my engine center of weight has to be at least 6" behind stock anyway, damn near the whole engine is behind the kingpin. I think I'm happy with that.:D
     

  7. You're fine. Its a matter of what you are happy with. Engine behind the axle center is good.

    On my current project the headers will be scratch built or modified over the counter headers so its really a non issue for me. But I have never had a normal car so to me its just normal to have to deal with little issues like that.

    Unless you are building a canyon carver or a dragster you will be fine with your engine where it is. Now finish that ****** up one of us needs to finish one. ;)
     
  8. Mr48chev
    Joined: Dec 28, 2007
    Posts: 36,009

    Mr48chev
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    Yep, if you are going to set it back, set it back the 10% that was in the rule book in the old days and have it correct in that manner. I've ridden in a few cars that had engines set back in the 60's when it was done pretty often and you give up a lot of room to have them that way. Also a pain in the **** to work on at times unless you build a removable dog house like a van.

    I'm not sure I would do it just to raise the Bubba factor though.
     
  9. Da Tinman
    Joined: Dec 29, 2005
    Posts: 4,222

    Da Tinman
    Member


    Huh?:confused:
     
  10. R Frederick
    Joined: Mar 30, 2009
    Posts: 2,658

    R Frederick
    Member
    from illinois

    Yea, if I have a 110" wheelbase car with the #1 plug in line with the front spindles, and say the engine can be physically set 36" in front of the rear axle and the #1 plug, I have moved the engine back 74". That should be good for at least a gain of 3,700 rear wheel horsepower right?:D
     
  11. Da Tinman
    Joined: Dec 29, 2005
    Posts: 4,222

    Da Tinman
    Member

    He must have stayed at a holiday inn last night or something.
     
  12. R Frederick
    Joined: Mar 30, 2009
    Posts: 2,658

    R Frederick
    Member
    from illinois

    Got my front suspension mocked up this weekend. I'm pretty happy about where the engine sits, and ride height. I set the front axle 1" forward on 50 Chevy truck springs. Gotta pull the engine back out and get all my bracing and welding done.
    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
     
  13. hrm2k
    Joined: Oct 2, 2007
    Posts: 5,468

    hrm2k
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    Wicked...............looks great........you did good
     
  14. R Frederick
    Joined: Mar 30, 2009
    Posts: 2,658

    R Frederick
    Member
    from illinois

    Thank you. It's not much to look at yet, I have a lot of welding - cleaning - and painting ahead.
     
  15. R Frederick
    Joined: Mar 30, 2009
    Posts: 2,658

    R Frederick
    Member
    from illinois

    Scored some good stuff at an O/T local swap meet last week. Intake, Valve covers, drag shocks, ladder bar mounts, front wheels (15x4,5 Indys), and what looks to be a start to my fenderwell headers. Let's just say I got a LOT of cast aluminum REAL cheap.:D
    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
     
  16. Trencher
    Joined: Nov 27, 2009
    Posts: 87

    Trencher
    Member

    was gonna let you know, if you know Skinny, he has a set of the chevy II fenderwell headers, I'm sure he'd sell 'em, or at least let you try them...did you get your stuff at the Allen's meet last weekend? A buddy of mine said they had a complete quickchange for $500
     
  17. R Frederick
    Joined: Mar 30, 2009
    Posts: 2,658

    R Frederick
    Member
    from illinois

    Yes, I got the fronts and the valve covers for $50 ea. set, I went because I figured nobody that was going to that type of a swap meet would be looking for this type of stuff. I walked past some other stuff I needed, but I had to draw the line somewhere. I thing the chevyII headers would go back into the firewall too far anyway, I was told that on another thread anyway. If I would need to cut them up, I might as well plan on making them myself anyway. I saw a quickchange for $400, but without any hubs on the ends. I did p*** up a SBC tri-power with carbs for $400 and I could have talked him down from that quite a bit.
     
  18. Model A John
    Joined: Apr 24, 2008
    Posts: 1,771

    Model A John
    Member
    from wichita ks

    Lookin' good. You've got a good start there.
     

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.