Register now to get rid of these ads!

Why not Vortec?

Discussion in 'The Hokey Ass Message Board' started by 2ratty4u, Jan 25, 2011.

  1. 2ratty4u
    Joined: Oct 5, 2008
    Posts: 61

    2ratty4u
    Member
    from dallas, tx

    Looking around at motors (going with a 350) for my project A and wondering why nobody uses Vortec motors (other than them being newer & o/t), is there any reason it is HIGHLY advised against? Aren't there bolt-on adapters for valve covers, etc that you can get to run older stuff? Just looking for a good reason to pass on a running Vortec motor for only a few hundred $$. Thanks!!
     
  2. gimpyshotrods
    Joined: May 20, 2009
    Posts: 24,277

    gimpyshotrods
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    I run one, and have put them in several customer vehicles. With a little labor, they can be dressed up to look like an older engine. Roller cams, and hardened valve seats are nice things to have with today's fuels and oils.
     
  3. Nutin wrong with them from a mechanical standpoint. They just aren't desirable to the trad crowd and GM has built a better motor since then for the high zot gotta have the newest and best crowd.

    They are kind of like Fords V-8 60, a transition motor, if Ford hadn't built a 100 horse flatty everyone would still want a V-8 60.
     
  4. 2ratty4u
    Joined: Oct 5, 2008
    Posts: 61

    2ratty4u
    Member
    from dallas, tx

    I figure, some people are gonna look at it and be disgusted, but there's gonna be more than one thing on my car that is going to make people turn their head (for one reason or another). The intake has been swapped and it is running a carb, so I am just wanting to make sure there is nothing technical that would cause me headaches in the future either!
     
  5. gimpyshotrods
    Joined: May 20, 2009
    Posts: 24,277

    gimpyshotrods
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    Since you are going to have to change the water pump (original is reverse rotation), you can swap it for a short one. This will help with clearance in the A, and the look.

    If you are ambitious, you can get rid of almost everything that would be a dead giveaway, with a die grinder and some time. If you run the adapters for older valve covers, then the only "tell" would be the middle 4 intake bolts.

    There are no technical issues, save for one that I can think of. The roller cam requires a hardened (melonized) distributor gear. It will eat a regular one. Such as:

    http://www.summitracing.com/parts/ACF-10456413/
     
  6. yblock292
    Joined: Oct 10, 2006
    Posts: 2,937

    yblock292
    Member

    I was just telling one of the guys, just bought a brand new one , test run, 3 year 100,000 warranty, delivered to my front door for $2399, for my 98 GMC daily. Runs better then the original motor ever did.
     
  7. Just don't spend too much time in the lawn chair and you'll never even know that someone didn't like your engine.

    Like as has been mentioned you may need a hard distributer gear. Not all vortecs were roller motors you can find that out by running the numbers. Not all had center mount valve covers either. Some of the early truck motors had perimeter mounts like the older motors.
     
  8. Hightone111
    Joined: Apr 5, 2007
    Posts: 323

    Hightone111
    Member

    The same reason "we" don't run fiberglass and disk brakes with drum covers
     
  9. They're known for the intake gaskets leaking in the 100K range, dumping coolant into the oil and if not caught fast enough grenading the motor. Other than that I guess they're okay, particularly if you plan on running a hood on your car.
     
  10. 2ratty4u
    Joined: Oct 5, 2008
    Posts: 61

    2ratty4u
    Member
    from dallas, tx

    Sweet, I'll be running discs too.

    It is a '97 motor if that helps with the distributor gear issue. But I will get the numbers to find out.
     
  11. brandon
    Joined: Jul 19, 2002
    Posts: 6,372

    brandon
    Member

    figured you were talking 96 up motor....change of roller cam and intake and it would probably run faster than your comfortable:eek: heads alone picked up my 93 truck motor a second, :D roll on with it and worry about the old school police l:cool::pater
     
  12. scottybaccus
    Joined: Mar 13, 2006
    Posts: 4,109

    scottybaccus
    Member

    I have one, too. No valve cover issues here...

    [​IMG]
     
  13. No big problems with these motors. You can change out the plastic timing cover for a tin one and there are adapters for the valve covers to run the perimeter bolt style.The Distributor gear GM calls for a roller motor is "Melonized". You will be changing out your dizzy if you are running a carb anyway cause the one for the EFI won't work for your app. You could use dizzy with the small cap and a bronze gear-put some old style pulleys on it and away ya go.Don't pass up a good cheap motor.

    Plan"B"-Buy the Votec-clean it up-sell it for a profit and buy and old style motor.
     
  14. You should be able to determine whether it is roller or not just by removing a valve cover and peering into the lifter valley (assuming you know what to look for ... dog bone, dog bone spider). I've used this method in the wrecking yard, you will need a flashlight.
     
  15. junk yard kid
    Joined: Nov 11, 2007
    Posts: 2,717

    junk yard kid
    Member

    Thos valve covers are really nice.
     
  16. They are good motors. Some of them have wierd intake bolt patterns though. My dad has an L31 motor that he hasn't figured out what to do with yet. It requires a unique intake. There are a few aftermarket intakes available (edelbrock even offers a 3x2 intake for them) but no selection like the previous generation sbc's.
     

  17. All ya gotta do is wobble out the center two holes on the intake to put the early intake on one.

    Scotty I like your solution to rocker covers. I know I said I didn't but that was a different arguement all together. ;)

    I think in my junk I have a pair of oddball rocker covers for a vortech. They are stamped steel that appear to be finned at a glance. I'll have to look someday. Not that I'll ever own one but someone will want them someday I'm sure.
     
  18. gwarren007
    Joined: Apr 3, 2010
    Posts: 381

    gwarren007
    Member

    There are no center bolts on the vortec 96-2001 :rolleyes:
    Eight bolts hold the intake on, not 12 like the 55-95 heads have. I personally would have the heads drilled/tapped for the standard intakes.
     
  19. stevechaos13
    Joined: Sep 11, 2008
    Posts: 419

    stevechaos13
    Member

    +10
    Been there myself. Made it almost to 120K though, and was able to catch it in time.
     
  20. AllSteel36
    Joined: Jul 20, 2009
    Posts: 560

    AllSteel36
    Member
    from California

    I don't think you can even adapt a "standard" intake, regardless of the mounting holes, IIRC the intake runners are much taller than standard SBC heads, and without welding/etc, I'm almost positive they would never seal.
     
  21. gwarren007
    Joined: Apr 3, 2010
    Posts: 381

    gwarren007
    Member

    Many places drill and tap them for the standard intakes, incuding Scoggin Dickey Chevrolet.
     
  22. budd
    Joined: Oct 31, 2006
    Posts: 3,478

    budd
    Member

    i have a couple 283's i'd like to run vortec heads on and a hydraulic roller cam.
     
  23. dontlifttoshift
    Joined: Sep 17, 2005
    Posts: 652

    dontlifttoshift
    Member

    Can't run a standard intake on a vortec, even if you drill and tap the holes an old intake will not cover the intake ports in the heads.

    GM's fastburn heads (aluminum vortec) are drilled for both intake patterns and when we tried to use an old style intake you could see the intake ports till. That's how I know.

    Vortec motors are badass, stab a cam in it and go fast.
     
  24. AllSteel36
    Joined: Jul 20, 2009
    Posts: 560

    AllSteel36
    Member
    from California


    No sir. The intake runners are too tall to just try and modify the mounting holes.
     
  25. flyin-t
    Joined: Dec 29, 2004
    Posts: 1,585

    flyin-t
    Member

    Huh?

    How is the V8-60 a transition engine to the 100 horse flatty, it's not even in the same family.
     
  26. woodienut
    Joined: Feb 17, 2009
    Posts: 349

    woodienut
    Member
    from So.Cal.

     
  27. bobscogin
    Joined: Feb 8, 2007
    Posts: 1,791

    bobscogin
    Member

    I believe the mod you're referring to was to accommodate the change in angle on the inner pair of intake bolts in 1987, not a Vortec mod.

    Bob
     
  28. yblock292
    Joined: Oct 10, 2006
    Posts: 2,937

    yblock292
    Member

    Yep exactly what happen to my original motor, changed out at 100K shot craps at 207K, put the new motor together with the new and improved gasket.
     
  29. edweird
    Joined: Jan 4, 2009
    Posts: 3,186

    edweird
    Member

    all ya gotta do is this with a regular small block intake.
     

    Attached Files:

  30. gimpyshotrods
    Joined: May 20, 2009
    Posts: 24,277

    gimpyshotrods
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    There is some confusion going on in this thread over the Vortec name.

    GM started using the term in 1986, to describe the 90-degree V6. We somehow attached it to everything with center bolt heads. The actual Vortec heads showed up in 1996.
     

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.