Register now to get rid of these ads!

M-II kits with or without strut rods ??

Discussion in 'The Hokey Ass Message Board' started by Tugmaster, Jan 30, 2011.

  1. I'm more that likely going to be putting a M-II front end in my new project. I noticed some of them ude strut rods and some don't. What are the advatages/disadvantages of either. I will be running springs and shocks. Not airbags. Thanks, Todd
     
  2. BillyM
    Joined: Feb 9, 2010
    Posts: 144

    BillyM
    Member

    I did a M-II into a Model A a couple of years ago - if you are going to use the stock lower arms, then you'll need the strut. I converted to tubular arms, which were wider, eliminating the need for the strut. In my opinion, it looks a lot cleaner, and it's working great.

    Hope this helps.
     
  3. old lady's mad
    Joined: Mar 18, 2007
    Posts: 169

    old lady's mad
    Member

    do a little investigation. yes look better without them. but there are diffrent kits out there. some simply use a sleve and gusset on the back side of you tubular lower , without using a larger bolt size. these tend to not hold up for daily drivers. others are a complete diffrent lower kit and have a larger main bolt . that seems to hold up. make sure what your buying dont get you killed.
     
  4. The front end is going to be covered by the front fenders, so the looks better thing is not an issue. Just from looking at the different setups I would think the struts would bind if you were super low with bags. Not totally sure though thats why I posed the question. Todd
     
  5. Also depending on your motor and frame combination, the MII without struts can give you more header room
     
  6. Good point. I am more than likely going with the Ch***is engineering x-member. I will give them a call and see what they say. I know they've been doing these for along time. Todd
     
  7. sawzall
    Joined: Jul 15, 2002
    Posts: 4,765

    sawzall
    Member

    FORD spent millions figuring out how to make these front ends work..
    stay with struts if you can..
     
  8. Dirk35
    Joined: Mar 8, 2001
    Posts: 2,067

    Dirk35
    Member

    I had one that used the strut rods on my 35 Pickup and had pleanty of room....but I used shorty headers, not full length headers. I prefer the strut rods personally, they seem better built. I also second the suggestion to use the search feature to find Elpolako posts about the kits that eliminate the strut rod and what to look for. Apparently, the braking forces try to twist the suspension out from under the vehicle so its pretty inportant to research it.
     
  9. johnod
    Joined: Aug 18, 2009
    Posts: 804

    johnod
    Member

  10. FatMan sells mostly wide lower A arms with their kits and stubs. I've built a sh.t load of these with no problems. The lower arms are upgrades to 5/8" dia. bolts also. The stockers run 1/2" Remember the stock MII crossmember was sheetmetal, those strut rods helped keep the a arms from rollong under and tearing out the crossmember. If your crossmember is made from modern heavy wall tubing and welded to the rails in good fashion there's not a problem!!!
     
  11. Dave 39
    Joined: Jul 24, 2006
    Posts: 58

    Dave 39
    Member

    You're on the right track with Ch***is Engineering. Quality stuff that fits and works well. Dave
     

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.