Register now to get rid of these ads!

Opinions Wanted: Should 32 Rear Frame Horns Always Point Slightly Down?

Discussion in 'The Hokey Ass Message Board' started by D-Russ, Jun 29, 2011.

  1. When I fit my Model A body onto my deuce frame I bobbed the rear rails mainly because I wasn't going to run a 32 tank.

    Now I'm going to shorten the pieces I cut off so I can run a rear spreader bar as a makeshift bumper. The floor of the body angles up right where the frame is bobbed. I know 32 rear frame rails angle down and that's what I am and everyone else is accustomed to seeing.

    If I mount the rear horns so they match the angle of the rear of the body, then they're angled up. Does this look OK, or should I figure out a way to mount them at a downward angle?

    EDIT: the horns in the pic are cardboard for easy modification so I can figure this out.

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]
     
    Last edited: May 2, 2012
  2. Bad Daddy
    Joined: Nov 13, 2010
    Posts: 829

    Bad Daddy
    Member

    Looks right to me. I like it.
     
  3. Smokin Joe
    Joined: Mar 19, 2002
    Posts: 3,770

    Smokin Joe
    Member

    Rubber Baby Buggy Bumpers...
    Rubber Baby Buggy Bumpers...
    Rugger babbe bruther humpers...

    Sorry, looks like a cheap quickie to me wherever you set it. Make a good track bar, Nerf bars or something. But then, it ain't mine so do it your way. Stick a club plaque on it or move the licence plate bracket to the bar and it might not look too bad. I'd cut a hole for that body bolt head and mount the rail so it was even with the body angle to look like the body was bolted to it if it was me and I had to have that cross bar. Everything should always look like it was designed to be there, not just stuck on. You can fudge on the front end where the rail bends up into the trunk behind the wheel and most will never know what you did. Made one that way back in the 70's.
     
    Last edited: Jun 29, 2011
  4. jackandeuces
    Joined: Feb 20, 2006
    Posts: 1,049

    jackandeuces
    Member

    Dave, I think they look better with the lower edge angling down and the upper fall as it may....
     
  5. I'd suggest you do at least two mock ups; one the way you've got it here, then one with the front portions tucked up as original or similar to it. Then do your photo from at least 10-20 feet back. Whenever mocking detail features, looking at them close up won't give you proper perspective.
     
  6. gnichols
    Joined: Mar 6, 2008
    Posts: 11,396

    gnichols
    Member
    from Tampa, FL

    V3 for me. Gary
     
  7. 3wLarry
    Joined: Mar 11, 2005
    Posts: 12,804

    3wLarry
    Member Emeritus
    from Owasso, Ok

    only my opinion, but I really like the last 2 pics. The only thing I would change is to bring the spreader bar closer to the body.
     
    kidcampbell71 likes this.
  8. hotrd32
    Joined: May 16, 2007
    Posts: 3,565

    hotrd32
    Member
    from WA

    Don't think it looks right pointing up....visually it makes the rear end lift...just doesn't look correct to me.......would have liked to have seen the other two from further back to get correct aesthetic.......my 2 cents
     
  9. What Larry said. Timely thread, I am adding horns to my 32 framed A Tudor, looking at the same issues right now!
     
  10. Same......2nd last pic with the bar closer in.
     
  11. 327-365hp
    Joined: Feb 5, 2006
    Posts: 5,435

    327-365hp
    Member
    from Mass

    If you're not going stock then maybe a push bar would look better. A big round tube like what you'd see on a Willys. Here's a pic of the Vicky on evilbay for the stock version.
     

    Attached Files:

  12. 327-365hp
    Joined: Feb 5, 2006
    Posts: 5,435

    327-365hp
    Member
    from Mass

    Here's what I think would look good.
     

    Attached Files:

  13. I'm with Larry too. Mock it closer to the body, and then do a walk around to make sure it works from all angles.
     
  14. Joe Didio
    Joined: Oct 7, 2006
    Posts: 93

    Joe Didio
    Member

    I agree with Jack. Angle the rear frame horns down. A little closer to the body also.
     

    Attached Files:

    • 004.jpg
      004.jpg
      File size:
      305.9 KB
      Views:
      105
    • 001.jpg
      001.jpg
      File size:
      351.7 KB
      Views:
      152
  15. I think a curved spreader bar tucked tightly to the body would look much better.
     
  16. Old&Low
    Joined: Mar 13, 2010
    Posts: 410

    Old&Low
    Member

    I kinda like the last two pics of your mock up also, without moving it in closer to the body; keeps the overall stance from looking too stubby and keeps your spreader bar 'bumper' far enough away from your body in case (God forbid) you do get 'bumped!'
     
  17. x4

    Matching the angle of the body looks good close up, but move further away and i agree with Larry.
     
  18. jackandeuces
    Joined: Feb 20, 2006
    Posts: 1,049

    jackandeuces
    Member

    .....Look right now////
     
  19. Von Rigg Fink
    Joined: Jun 11, 2007
    Posts: 13,404

    Von Rigg Fink
    Member
    from Garage

    It all comes down to how you want it to look..
    each build, and or car body style and how you have it set up will dictate the right look.

    once the covers are put on, it takes that slanted look away
     
    Last edited: Oct 29, 2012
  20. Von Rigg Fink
    Joined: Jun 11, 2007
    Posts: 13,404

    Von Rigg Fink
    Member
    from Garage

    She looks Bitchin'
    been watching you build her
     
  21. Here are a couple pics of my coupe, Dave, just to give you an idea as to what the stock angle is. Mine is a stock frame.
     

    Attached Files:

  22. oj
    Joined: Jul 27, 2008
    Posts: 6,568

    oj
    Member

    I thought v2 had something going on, maybe a little tighter to the body.
    Remember, a camel is a horse designed by a committee.
     
  23. I think on version 3, the rails should be a little wider.
    [​IMG]
    Or maybe angled. When you compare the frame rails on each side of the tire, the right is really wide, and on the left too narrow for my taste.
    Like almost every body said, move the bar closer to the body and you should be ready to go!
     
  24. Crystal Blue
    Joined: Nov 18, 2008
    Posts: 609

    Crystal Blue
    Member

    Here's a thought for something a little different.

    Box the horns, angled upwards to follow the body,

    curve the spreader bar to match the rear body line (when viewed from above).

    Extend the bar past the horns on each end and make them look like

    bullits (similar to your tail lights).

    The bullits would be perpendicular to the frame.

    Just a thought :)
     
  25. Zombie Hot Rod
    Joined: Oct 22, 2006
    Posts: 2,452

    Zombie Hot Rod
    Member
    from New York

    I think the problem is that your body angles upwards in the back, so if you make them fit the body, they're pointing upwards. . . if you angle the downwards, you have too much of a gap (cause the body goes up). Maybe try them perfectly straight and level, you'll have a little bit of a gap, but it wont be too drastic.

    I'd also go closer to the body like everyone been saying. On my car, the horns are level, and the rear of the spreader bar is about a 1/4 inch from the back of the body. . . and it looks great.
     
  26. Have been looking at Sorchiks B400 and his rear horns are almost level with teh spreader in so tight it almost touches, changed my thoughts. His looks good.
     
  27. At the moment just some color copies out of an old Street Rod Builder. No good scanner to get them to you, he has posted pics on here tho. Search under Jersy Suede.
     
  28. Avgas
    Joined: Dec 31, 2007
    Posts: 282

    Avgas
    Member

    For what its worth,these pieces look a little tacky to me. they appear to be formed from thinner guage material and the fold radius is way to sharp which gives the apperance of a 3 piece welded and fabricated "street rod" belly button! I have built 32 frames with the rear horns and bobbed and found that the frame needs completion in that area when a "mock up" is performed so that all is revealled!
     
  29. They're cardboard mock-ups . . . :rolleyes:
     
  30. 554coupe
    Joined: Nov 25, 2008
    Posts: 46

    554coupe
    Member
    from Australia

    Gidday Dave . I agree With 3WLarry . the last two pics are right . i have a mate who has a 30 coupe on duece rails but has altered the frame over the rear As it's not seen . What does matter however is , what is seen . & his car has the rails pointing down and the spreader up close to the body for a neat finish . people don't know what they can't see under the body . Car looks great by the way .
     
    Last edited: Oct 10, 2011

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.