Getting ready to fill the newly blasted-out tank on the '62, fire it up, check for leaks in my plumbing, all that good ****. I was curious about how many of you use the "lead-subsitute" additive for engines manufactured before the advent of unleaded gas? I heard it was a wise thing to do... any comments? I'm running a stock 390 Thunderbird w/ the original 4bbl. Tell me quick, I'm filling it up this weekend! And I did finally get some pics shot, just havent been to Walmart yet to get them on CD... stay tuned
My old man has a damn near cherry '56 Thunderbird that he runs lead additive in. As far as I know the motor was last rebuilt about 30 years ago by my uncle and it still gets driven almost daily in the summer months. Runs like a top and has always had lead, as far as I know.
i was always told that the lead was added to gas to slow down the explosiveness of it, kinda keep it under control.when lead isn't used they subs***ue something else, in some cases it was nickle.If you rememeber in the "Old" days they sold "white " gas & it was more money. So anyhow, I don't really think its need & think the "lubes the valves" is a bunch of ****, cool gas going over the intake valve is lube enough. jimV
http://www.jalopyjournal.com/forum/showthread.php?t=47341&highlight=lead+additive Check this out-MIKE
Thanks so much... I've already bought a case 'cause i was told it was needed in every tank... It sounds like every third tank or so would be fine, just to use it up. The valve-seat problem was what I was warned about, but we'll take our chances!