Register now to get rid of these ads!

How To Build a MONSTER HP GMC 302?

Discussion in 'The Hokey Ass Message Board' started by 38FLATTIE, May 2, 2011.

  1. 38FLATTIE
    Joined: Oct 26, 2008
    Posts: 4,349

    38FLATTIE
    Member
    from Colorado

    Ok, guys, help me out here. I've searched, and found some info, but not enough.

    Let's theoretically build the perfect blown,alcohol 302 GMC, punched out to 322CI

    We'll run a Skinner 12 port head, with Fontana injectors.

    Should we use the Sissel pushrod setup? Crank girdle? Tell me what you think.

    I know nothing about these engines so please educate me!
     
    Last edited: May 2, 2011
  2. RichFox
    Joined: Dec 3, 2006
    Posts: 10,020

    RichFox
    Member Emeritus

    I think you should set it on a shelf for a few years and develop the Flat Cad. While you are at it develop a close relationship with Joe. He knew everything there is to know about GMCs before I knew which way to Bonneville.
     
  3. 38FLATTIE
    Joined: Oct 26, 2008
    Posts: 4,349

    38FLATTIE
    Member
    from Colorado

    Haha!

    That's pretty much the plan. Dollars dictate it must be so!

    In the mean time, I'm talking to everyone I can, and gathering information and ideas. I just got off the phone with Don Ferguson. He has a billet cam blank.
     
  4. RichFox
    Joined: Dec 3, 2006
    Posts: 10,020

    RichFox
    Member Emeritus

    Between Doug Robinson, Don Ferguson, and Joe Fontana there must be all the information about big power GMC engines that exists. Since you are in contact with all of them, I would say, Listen to what they say. How many HAMB guys with their experience? Doug's blown motor has always exemplified the all out GMC to me. But Joe must know more than anybody about running a Skinner head. And Don has a 300mph GMC. Don't hear a lot of people saying that. Plenty of good advise in that group.
     
  5. 38FLATTIE
    Joined: Oct 26, 2008
    Posts: 4,349

    38FLATTIE
    Member
    from Colorado

    Point taken!

    I like that avatar better than the plane....
     
    Last edited: May 3, 2011
  6. RichFox
    Joined: Dec 3, 2006
    Posts: 10,020

    RichFox
    Member Emeritus

    Shiga Maru. That was the name of that brand new DC8. Sitting in San Francisco Bay on my way to work. He was going to the same place but didn't quite make it. Towed it in on a barge two days later and flew it out after some months and of lots of overtime.
     
  7. 38FLATTIE
    Joined: Oct 26, 2008
    Posts: 4,349

    38FLATTIE
    Member
    from Colorado

    That's pretty ironic!

    The Shiga Maru was also a Japanese ship sunk during the war.....
     
  8. plan9
    Joined: Jun 3, 2003
    Posts: 4,079

    plan9
    Member

    id like to pick up the flatcad and Jimmy torch as well... but my pocket book would kick me in the nutts repeatedly. although im real curious to see what your motor will do this year, its going to be interesting!
     
  9. 38FLATTIE
    Joined: Oct 26, 2008
    Posts: 4,349

    38FLATTIE
    Member
    from Colorado


    Oh, mine does that too!

    ....and then there's still the wife to worry about!
     
  10. RichFox
    Joined: Dec 3, 2006
    Posts: 10,020

    RichFox
    Member Emeritus

    It was explained to me that all Japanese ships are Maru. It means fish or some such so only the first word changes. Then for some reason when airplanes came along they still called them Maru. I would guess there have been several Shiga Maru's. This one flew for at least another 20 years after landing in the Bay. No one got wet. Not even their baggage. It ended up in the drink just off the San Mateo Yacht Club. And the Yachtsmen there powered out and brought the people back to the bar. What a deal.
     
  11. zibo
    Joined: Mar 17, 2002
    Posts: 2,361

    zibo
    Member
    from dago ca

    Hey Buddie, you have the best form of ADD!
    TP
     
  12. 38FLATTIE
    Joined: Oct 26, 2008
    Posts: 4,349

    38FLATTIE
    Member
    from Colorado

    That, or I'm just a glutton for punishment!:eek:

    Anyone know the rod journal size? I'm just wondering if there's enough there to offset grind the journals and gain .1 stroke?
     
  13. RichFox
    Joined: Dec 3, 2006
    Posts: 10,020

    RichFox
    Member Emeritus

    When you get inside your 302 look and see how close the rod big ends come to the cam. If the cam isn't timed right the rod will hit the lobe. Now start thinking about racing rods, even with smaller journals. Moved out .050. Talk to Doug before going forth with that idea. I know it's been done but at what cost?
     
  14. speakfordadead
    Joined: Mar 17, 2011
    Posts: 79

    speakfordadead
    Member

  15. speakfordadead
    Joined: Mar 17, 2011
    Posts: 79

    speakfordadead
    Member

    PS.... I have 248 cranks... you'll need the shorter stroke!!!
     
  16. RichFox
    Joined: Dec 3, 2006
    Posts: 10,020

    RichFox
    Member Emeritus

    Why would a 302 be a "torque monster" and a same but smaller bore 270 be a horsepower engine? I set my share of GMC records on the dirt and salt. I started with a 270 but when I got a 302 I ran it. As far as most of the records I think you will find 302 engines holding them. None that I know with 248 cranks.
     
  17. 38FLATTIE
    Joined: Oct 26, 2008
    Posts: 4,349

    38FLATTIE
    Member
    from Colorado

    Rich,

    As usual, you bring up good points. We are going to continue to work on the FlatCad, and try and get the most out of it that we can.

    In the mean time, I'll continue talking with Doug, Joe, and Don, and collecting parts, until the time is right for the engine build.
     
  18. speakfordadead
    Joined: Mar 17, 2011
    Posts: 79

    speakfordadead
    Member

    Maybe I am applying V-8 technology, but I am possibly under the wrong impression that a shorter stroke allows you to spin at a higher RPM. 270's can runout .125 over bore. 302's can run .125 over bore as well. Which is obviously larger, but how do you spin it faster with a 4 inch stroke??? Straighten me out!!! 248 crank is shorter, spins faster.... do you not de-stroke for higher rev's??? Pop's liked putting 305 cranks in .010 350 sbc's. Those roundy round cars lept out of the corners.... reverse cams helped too, but now are no-no's....
     
  19. RichFox
    Joined: Dec 3, 2006
    Posts: 10,020

    RichFox
    Member Emeritus

    OK, yes a 270 actually can and often does run a +.156 overbore. which with it's 4 inch stroke makes it a 292 cid engine. The 302 at +.125 over and with the stock 4 inch stroke is 320 cid. The extra 10% displacement should show greater power. The thought behind shorter stroke, higher power is that you will get more power strokes for ant given period on time. And if your heads will support unlimited RPMs this may actually work out But in real life, most of the time a good running small engine will become a better running large engine. That;s why we are not all blasting around in 1 liter Corvettes and Mustangs. 427s are faster.
     
  20. 305 and 350 are the same stroke it's the bore that changes but there are some lighter weight 305 cranks
     
  21. speakfordadead
    Joined: Mar 17, 2011
    Posts: 79

    speakfordadead
    Member

    Point taken.... thanks for the schooling. I guess attaining top speed is different theory than left circles. On and off the pedal requires torque and hp curves to turn on at lower rpms. When you have a few miles to crank it up it's all about displacement and how high you can rev it.
     
  22. dirtdeville
    Joined: May 23, 2011
    Posts: 1

    dirtdeville
    Member

    ok heres the recipe for a killer gmc 6
    #1 you need a flow bench whether its a stock head or 12 port get instruction manual from superflow in colorado springs anything can be used as a flow bench like a big shop vac or grainger sells vacuum motors thats whats in the superflow
    when don ferguson sr and i built the first stock head gmcs he bought every cyl head we could buy that was run at drags or bonneville i flowed them all intake would only support 220-250 hp wihin a week w were up over 400 hp cast iron welding was required not easy but can be done ( i didnt say it was easy)
    next make yourself a honing plate and use it
    use a steel cam core or billet
    i dont care if its a 270 or 302 big horsepower can be made
    we have been over 300 mph with stock cranks leave a little extra clearance as they flex we now use carrillo rods but have gone fast with stock ones with big block chevy bolts some polished beams some boxed
    do yourself a favor and make or buy some decent rockers
    you cant put enough bolts or pin in the flywheel to crank
    i got in the el mirage dirty two club with joe fontanas skinner and it runs pretty darn good
    we use big mgs now but had good results with gm hei from late 250
    there are no old intake manifolds that will feed this combo so make your own
    with a little learnin and a bunch of hours youll have a kick ass gmc, if it was easy everybody would be doin it (quote from don ferguson jr)
    jellybean
     
  23. 38FLATTIE
    Joined: Oct 26, 2008
    Posts: 4,349

    38FLATTIE
    Member
    from Colorado

    dirtdeville, thanks!

    I've got a couple of questions, if you don't mind?

    Did you have to do port work on the Skinner head, or was it good?

    Didn't you guys use a 7 main girdle in your 300+ mph engine?

    What kind of lift and duration are you using on those monsters?

    Did you use the two piece pushrods (think Sissel) with the additional lifter in the head?

    Oh, and I talked to Don, and ordered a billet cam core!
     
    Last edited: May 23, 2011
  24. greendragon
    Joined: Aug 12, 2011
    Posts: 4

    greendragon
    Member

    can't wait to read more on the 302. i want to recreate my g-pa's hot rod from the 60's. it had a 302 in it. so i want to learn all i can. but i want mine to still be a streetable car.
     
  25. 38FLATTIE
    Joined: Oct 26, 2008
    Posts: 4,349

    38FLATTIE
    Member
    from Colorado

    Can anyone provide the GMC 302 bore centerlines?
     
    HuskerNation likes this.
  26. oj
    Joined: Jul 27, 2008
    Posts: 6,541

    oj
    Member

    This is a little OT but you might like this drag car i put one if those 302s' in. The engine isn't complete here, it has a lot of clifford research stuff.
     

    Attached Files:

  27. 38FLATTIE
    Joined: Oct 26, 2008
    Posts: 4,349

    38FLATTIE
    Member
    from Colorado

    Oj, that's pretty cool!

    Any details on the engine build?
     
  28. bgbdlinc
    Joined: Jan 11, 2002
    Posts: 522

    bgbdlinc
    Member

    ...here's some inspirational eye-candy....go forth my son...

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]
     
  29. oj
    Joined: Jul 27, 2008
    Posts: 6,541

    oj
    Member


    I don't know much about it, it is roller and has some serious componants - it was built by less than knowledgable persons and when dyno'd they bent pushrods etc, the owner replaced the bent stuff and sold the engine to the current owner for literally pennies. While here i had the valve cover off it for fabrication purposes and saw that the roller rockers were bottoming out on the shoulder for the rocker studs. He pulled the head and i machined to bosses down .200 or so and that free'd everything up. I believe it has venolia rods and pistons, roller cam, crane gold roller rockers etc everything looked to me like it was sbc stuff but i didn't verify. I heard that it was built for N2O and belonged to a DC street racer and was in a 1st generation camaro that he'd sneak into big-purse street races. After-all, its only a 6cyl right? give me a car length and we'll run your mustang for a big one.
     
  30. Babyearl
    Joined: May 23, 2008
    Posts: 610

    Babyearl
    Member

    OK,, You have me hooked,, I need input,,
     

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.