Register now to get rid of these ads!

56 Pontiac 316 Keep it or Toss It?

Discussion in 'The Hokey Ass Message Board' started by 31bowtie, Aug 22, 2011.

  1. 31bowtie
    Joined: Aug 8, 2009
    Posts: 67

    31bowtie
    Member
    from maine

    Hi all. Looking for advice on whether or not to continue running the original 316 in my 56 Pontiac Star Chief, or trade out the motor and ****** for something more more modern? Motor runs good so far, but I am concerned with future repairs and what they might cost? I do like the nostalgic 316 and would like to keep it in the car, but parts could be hard to come by.
     
  2. bobwop
    Joined: Jan 13, 2008
    Posts: 6,135

    bobwop
    ALLIANCE MEMBER
    from Arley, AL

    good engine and transmission from Pontiac. Run it!
     
  3. Sir Woosh
    Joined: Dec 1, 2008
    Posts: 2,273

    Sir Woosh
    Member

    Had the next year newer 347 in a Chieftan 2 door sedan. Sat for around 20 years in a barnyard. Pulled it down. Looked so good, I regasketed it and ran it every day for years without a problem. Just service it well and it should do you well.

    Like Bob said, keep it............
     
  4. bryan6902
    Joined: May 5, 2008
    Posts: 1,137

    bryan6902
    Member

    Switching to something newer isn't always 'cheaper'. Pontiac used the 1 front mount and 2 trans mounts up to 1960. Anything after that will require some sort of adapter or fabrication to mount up. Then you're looking at exhaust, transmission, etc.. mods to make it all work right. And there is no newer engine that doesn't cost money to fix.

    I say run it as long as it lasts.
     
  5. wvenfield
    Joined: Nov 23, 2006
    Posts: 5,667

    wvenfield
    Member

    KEEP IT. I never even considered swapping mine. My buddy has a 389 he says he will give me and I keep telling him no.

    All parts are available.
     
  6. rld14
    Joined: Mar 30, 2011
    Posts: 1,609

    rld14
    Member

    Absolutely keep it. Egge has complete rebuild kits for what I consider to be reasonable money ($1500ish) so if you have to rebuild it I can't see it costing that much more than somethin boring and mundane (cough SBC, cough).
     
  7. lvlynyrd
    Joined: Jul 25, 2010
    Posts: 49

    lvlynyrd
    Member
    from Las Vegas

    My folks bought a 56 4dr wagon new. My oldest brother ran the hell out of it, then my older brother did the same, even spinning the tires off the wheels on a switchback. He also kicked **** on a '57 347 sedan in a drag. Then I got it and REALLY ran the pi** out of it. I sold it around '71 with 168,000 miles on it. Saw it in a wrecking yard a couple years later, was over 175,000 miles. Wrecker said the ****** gave out, motor was fine. That motor NEVER had a valve cover off it in the entire time we owned it. Those are wonderful motors, and with the old 4 speed turbo-hydramatic, they worked forever.
     
  8. It's a bear to change the motor in one of those, not much room to run an exhaust on the left side - the factory one actually dumps at the front, comes across and goes back.

    As for parts, Pontiac used the same block for years, so you can adapt parts from newer motors if necessary, but there's not a whole lot to go wrong on them. The only really specific parts on a 316 are pistons, rings, and bearings.

    Plus if you pull it out it's a hard sell, I actually ended up s****ping a spare set of old used and weathered heads last week - needed cash for something else and was tired of tripping over them, so I said goodbye. Couldn't sell them to anybody -
     
  9. Normbc9
    Joined: Apr 20, 2011
    Posts: 1,121

    Normbc9
    Member

    The 316 actually had a late '56 Pontiac performance package with a Dual Quad factory manifold with it and a special set of heads. They weren't a slouch either. Several were running in late '56 two door posts in the LA area at the Drag Strips. They sure impressed a lot of folks in that era. Clay Smith ground a full cam package with lifters and rocker arms for them. Then the factory showed up with the '57 347 ti-power. Interest in the 316 waned but it is a good strong engine. It it was mine I'd build it.
    Normbc9
     
  10. ROADSTER1927
    Joined: Feb 14, 2009
    Posts: 3,288

    ROADSTER1927
    Member

    I had a 55 287 in my 40 coupe for the first 6 years of flooging.It worked great and I only changed it out this year wnen I put a frame stub,power steering,power brakes and a 63 super duty 389 in front of the 4 speed.I sold the engine to a guy for his 55 ponti to put in as is and run. Have a great day Gary
     
  11. busguy71
    Joined: Oct 25, 2006
    Posts: 121

    busguy71
    Member

    My dad runs that stock motor in his 56 Pontiac, has good enough power and looks sweet with 3 dueces, sounds great with flowmasters. KEEP IT!!!!
     
  12. 31bowtie
    Joined: Aug 8, 2009
    Posts: 67

    31bowtie
    Member
    from maine

    Thanks for all the info and advice! The 316 I have has 100,000 miles on it and seems to run well, so I guess I will keep it! I do like the nostalgic original motor. I wanted some input before spending more money getting it set up with Pertronix etc. Might try and find some headers that will fit. Thanks again!
     
  13. Rusty Heaps
    Joined: May 19, 2011
    Posts: 1,005

    Rusty Heaps
    Member

    Toss it !!!! My way!:D
     

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.